Balancing responsibility-sharing in the simulated clinical skills setting: A strategy to remove barriers to feedback engagement as a new concept to promote a growth-enhancing process

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
RM Abraham
{"title":"Balancing responsibility-sharing in the simulated clinical skills setting: A strategy to remove barriers to feedback engagement as a new concept to promote a growth-enhancing process","authors":"RM Abraham","doi":"10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i1.1630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. When feedback is provided in a formative context, it must be used effectively by learners. Many barriers prevent medical students from meaningfully engaging with feedback in the clinical learning environment.Objective. To explore how medical students engage with feedback in preclinical skills training.Methods. Using an exploratory qualitative methodology, data from five focus groups, including 25 purposively selected third-year medical students, were iteratively analysed and identified and key themes were clarified.Results. The data revealed barriers that inhibit the use of feedback, ranging from students’ difficulties with decoding feedback, to their unwillingness to expend effort. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes related to the barriers to feedback receptivity and utilisation.Conclusion. Without collaboration, neither clinical educators nor students are empowered to fully remove the abovementioned barriers. Promoting a student’s learning is often framed as predominantly the task of their clinical educators. With a move towards constructivism, competency-based medical education claims that effective learning requires students to complement and significantly share in their educator’s responsibilities for their academic growth. Developing a responsibility-sharing culture in the giving and receiving of feedback ensures that students benefit fully from the feedback received through proactive engagement, leading to effective and sustainable clinical educator’s feedback practices. With minimal discussion on the concept ofresponsibility-sharing in the context of assessment feedback in medical education, it is necessary to further analyse and discuss this critical issue by considering certain expectations that should reinforce such a culture, along with the practicalities of creating this cultural shift within the preclinical skills setting.","PeriodicalId":43683,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i1.1630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. When feedback is provided in a formative context, it must be used effectively by learners. Many barriers prevent medical students from meaningfully engaging with feedback in the clinical learning environment.Objective. To explore how medical students engage with feedback in preclinical skills training.Methods. Using an exploratory qualitative methodology, data from five focus groups, including 25 purposively selected third-year medical students, were iteratively analysed and identified and key themes were clarified.Results. The data revealed barriers that inhibit the use of feedback, ranging from students’ difficulties with decoding feedback, to their unwillingness to expend effort. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes related to the barriers to feedback receptivity and utilisation.Conclusion. Without collaboration, neither clinical educators nor students are empowered to fully remove the abovementioned barriers. Promoting a student’s learning is often framed as predominantly the task of their clinical educators. With a move towards constructivism, competency-based medical education claims that effective learning requires students to complement and significantly share in their educator’s responsibilities for their academic growth. Developing a responsibility-sharing culture in the giving and receiving of feedback ensures that students benefit fully from the feedback received through proactive engagement, leading to effective and sustainable clinical educator’s feedback practices. With minimal discussion on the concept ofresponsibility-sharing in the context of assessment feedback in medical education, it is necessary to further analyse and discuss this critical issue by considering certain expectations that should reinforce such a culture, along with the practicalities of creating this cultural shift within the preclinical skills setting.
在模拟临床技能环境中平衡责任分担:一种消除反馈参与障碍的策略,作为促进成长过程的新概念
背景。当反馈在形成环境中提供时,学习者必须有效地使用它。许多障碍阻碍医学生在临床学习环境中有意义地参与反馈。目的。探讨医学生在临床前技能培训中如何参与反馈。采用探索性定性方法,从五个焦点小组(包括25名有目的选择的三年级医学生)中反复分析和确定数据,并阐明关键主题。数据揭示了阻碍反馈使用的障碍,从学生解码反馈的困难,到他们不愿意付出努力。主题分析揭示了与反馈接受和利用障碍相关的四个主要主题。没有合作,无论是临床教育者还是学生都不能完全消除上述障碍。促进学生的学习通常被认为是临床教育工作者的主要任务。随着建构主义的发展,以能力为基础的医学教育声称,有效的学习要求学生补充并显著地分担教育者对他们学术成长的责任。在给予和接受反馈的过程中建立责任共享的文化,确保学生通过积极参与从反馈中充分受益,从而实现有效和可持续的临床教育反馈实践。在医学教育评估反馈的背景下,对责任分担概念的讨论很少,有必要进一步分析和讨论这一关键问题,考虑应该加强这种文化的某些期望,以及在临床前技能设置中创造这种文化转变的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Health Professions Education
African Journal of Health Professions Education HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信