Unleashing the potential of local brand equity of Hong Kong as a green–creative–smart city

IF 1.8 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Chung-Shing Chan, Wan Yan Tsun
{"title":"Unleashing the potential of local brand equity of Hong Kong as a green–creative–smart city","authors":"Chung-Shing Chan, Wan Yan Tsun","doi":"10.1108/jpmd-12-2022-0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to propose resident-based brand equity models on green, creative and smart development themes through a multi-sample telephone survey on Hong Kong residents (n = 751).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research adopted a quantitative approach with a round of questionnaire-based survey carried out anonymously on adult citizens who have stayed in Hong Kong for more than one year. Telephone survey was performed by a professional survey research centre with trained interviewers between May and July 2022.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study identifies the magnitude of these city brand equity attributes and reconfigured their composition under separate samples of Hong Kong residents. The results reveal the relatively stronger brand equity for developing Hong Kong as a smart city brand compared with green and creative branding.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research findings might carry a major limitation of varied interpretations and stereotypes of each city theme (green, creative and smart) by local residents. To minimize the expected bias, two core questions were added to provide respondents with information on each theme before the main survey questions. The questions’ wording was also simplified to ensure the constraint and inconsistency of layman effect.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe common attributes across the themes, including distinctiveness, uniqueness, confidence, positive image, liveability, long-term residence, feature familiarity and top-of-mind, indicate the most prominent aspects of brand equity formation and enhancement. Since urban sustainability does not follow a single path of strategies and infrastructure development, city brand process should also follow a selective approach, which clearly identifies a multiplicity of local interests that could create the best outcomes and the strongest brand equity for the city.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe factor allocation and regression analysis elucidate different configurations of the determining factors with a three-factor model for green city brand equity and two-factor models for the other ones. The findings encore some previous studies supporting the differentiation between common attributes and distinctive attributes, and the overlapping approach to unleash the strongest integration of attributes of brand equity.\n","PeriodicalId":46966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Place Management and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Place Management and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-12-2022-0122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose resident-based brand equity models on green, creative and smart development themes through a multi-sample telephone survey on Hong Kong residents (n = 751). Design/methodology/approach This research adopted a quantitative approach with a round of questionnaire-based survey carried out anonymously on adult citizens who have stayed in Hong Kong for more than one year. Telephone survey was performed by a professional survey research centre with trained interviewers between May and July 2022. Findings The study identifies the magnitude of these city brand equity attributes and reconfigured their composition under separate samples of Hong Kong residents. The results reveal the relatively stronger brand equity for developing Hong Kong as a smart city brand compared with green and creative branding. Research limitations/implications The research findings might carry a major limitation of varied interpretations and stereotypes of each city theme (green, creative and smart) by local residents. To minimize the expected bias, two core questions were added to provide respondents with information on each theme before the main survey questions. The questions’ wording was also simplified to ensure the constraint and inconsistency of layman effect. Practical implications The common attributes across the themes, including distinctiveness, uniqueness, confidence, positive image, liveability, long-term residence, feature familiarity and top-of-mind, indicate the most prominent aspects of brand equity formation and enhancement. Since urban sustainability does not follow a single path of strategies and infrastructure development, city brand process should also follow a selective approach, which clearly identifies a multiplicity of local interests that could create the best outcomes and the strongest brand equity for the city. Originality/value The factor allocation and regression analysis elucidate different configurations of the determining factors with a three-factor model for green city brand equity and two-factor models for the other ones. The findings encore some previous studies supporting the differentiation between common attributes and distinctive attributes, and the overlapping approach to unleash the strongest integration of attributes of brand equity.
释放香港作为绿色-创意-智慧城市的本土品牌资产潜力
目的本研究旨在通过对香港居民(n=751)的多样本电话调查,提出以绿色、创意和智能发展为主题的居民品牌资产模型。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定量方法,对在香港居住超过一年的成年公民进行了一轮基于问卷的匿名调查。电话调查由一家专业调查研究中心在2022年5月至7月期间与训练有素的访谈者进行。调查结果该研究确定了这些城市品牌资产属性的规模,并在香港居民的单独样本下重新配置了其组成。研究结果表明,与绿色创意品牌相比,香港作为智慧城市品牌的品牌资产相对较强。研究局限性/含义研究结果可能会对当地居民对每个城市主题(绿色、创意和智慧)的不同解释和刻板印象产生重大限制。为了最大限度地减少预期的偏见,在主要调查问题之前,增加了两个核心问题,为受访者提供每个主题的信息。问题的措辞也被简化,以确保外行效应的约束和不一致性。实践含义各主题的共同属性,包括独特性、独特性、自信、正面形象、宜居性、长期居住性、特征熟悉性和顶尖度,表明了品牌资产形成和增强的最突出方面。由于城市可持续发展不遵循单一的战略和基础设施发展路径,城市品牌过程也应遵循选择性方法,明确确定多种当地利益,从而为城市创造最佳结果和最强的品牌资产。独创性/价值因素分配和回归分析阐明了决定因素的不同配置,绿色城市品牌资产的三因素模型和其他因素的两因素模型。这些发现重申了之前的一些研究,支持共同属性和独特属性之间的差异,以及释放品牌资产属性最强整合的重叠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Place Management and Development
Journal of Place Management and Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信