Epistemic Matrices In The Construction Of Knowledge On Learning in Organizations

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT
D. Durante, Antonio Carlos Coelho
{"title":"Epistemic Matrices In The Construction Of Knowledge On Learning in Organizations","authors":"D. Durante, Antonio Carlos Coelho","doi":"10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our critical epistemic review examines how researchers deal with the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations from the standpoint of cognitive interests. We adopted the epistemic matrices’ analytical model elaborated by Paes de Paula (2016), who handles the creation of knowledge based on cognitive interests and epistemic reconstruction, as an alternative to the paradigms of Burrel and Morgan (1979). The object of analysis were dissertations defended in Brazilian stricto sensu graduate programs in Administration. The identification of cognitive interests in the dissertations was based on sociological approaches classified by the circle of epistemic matrices, which encompasses pure sociological approaches and sets of overlapping closed curves, forming hybrid sociological approaches. The latent and clear content of sociological approaches were collected and analyzed using the qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti 7. We conclude that the technical and practical interests guide the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations – putting aside the emancipatory interest in our discussions. We also conclude that, in order to make contributions for the advancement of knowledge, our study must go beyond the aggregation of cognitive interests; it is necessary to investigate the postulates of sociological approaches to which the interests are connected.","PeriodicalId":53951,"journal":{"name":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","volume":"21 1","pages":"255-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our critical epistemic review examines how researchers deal with the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations from the standpoint of cognitive interests. We adopted the epistemic matrices’ analytical model elaborated by Paes de Paula (2016), who handles the creation of knowledge based on cognitive interests and epistemic reconstruction, as an alternative to the paradigms of Burrel and Morgan (1979). The object of analysis were dissertations defended in Brazilian stricto sensu graduate programs in Administration. The identification of cognitive interests in the dissertations was based on sociological approaches classified by the circle of epistemic matrices, which encompasses pure sociological approaches and sets of overlapping closed curves, forming hybrid sociological approaches. The latent and clear content of sociological approaches were collected and analyzed using the qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti 7. We conclude that the technical and practical interests guide the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations – putting aside the emancipatory interest in our discussions. We also conclude that, in order to make contributions for the advancement of knowledge, our study must go beyond the aggregation of cognitive interests; it is necessary to investigate the postulates of sociological approaches to which the interests are connected.
组织学习知识建构中的认知矩阵
我们的批判性认识论综述从认知兴趣的角度考察了研究人员如何处理组织中学习知识的创造。我们采用了Paes de Paula(2016)阐述的认知矩阵分析模型,作为Burrel和Morgan(1979)范式的替代方案,Paes de Bola处理基于认知兴趣和认知重建的知识创造。分析的对象是巴西严格意义上的行政学研究生课程中的论文答辩。学位论文中对认知兴趣的识别是基于按认识矩阵圈分类的社会学方法,该方法包括纯社会学方法和重叠的闭合曲线集,形成了混合社会学方法。使用定性数据分析软件Atlas.ti 7收集并分析了社会学方法的潜在和明确内容。我们得出的结论是,技术和实践利益指导了组织中学习知识的创造——在我们的讨论中抛开解放利益。我们还得出结论,为了为知识的进步做出贡献,我们的研究必须超越认知兴趣的聚合;有必要研究与利益相关的社会学方法的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信