The Effects of Role Play Simulation and Demonstration on Pediatric Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion Skill among Nursing Students: A Three Group Experimental Study

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
L. Valizadeh, B. Akbarzadeh, Shahrzad Ghiyasvandiyan, Zahra KuchakiNejad, V. Zamanzadeh, P. Aghajari, F. Jabbarzadeh, Maureen Crowley
{"title":"The Effects of Role Play Simulation and Demonstration on Pediatric Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion Skill among Nursing Students: A Three Group Experimental Study","authors":"L. Valizadeh, B. Akbarzadeh, Shahrzad Ghiyasvandiyan, Zahra KuchakiNejad, V. Zamanzadeh, P. Aghajari, F. Jabbarzadeh, Maureen Crowley","doi":"10.4103/nms.nms_94_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The short course of baccalaureate nursing program and overcrowding of clinical settings restrict the development of pediatric peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion skill among nursing students. Therefore, better teaching strategies are needed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of role play simulation and demonstration on pediatric PVC insertion skill among nursing students. Methods: In this three-group experimental study, 46 nursing students were selected from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, randomly allocated to a control, a role play simulation, or a demonstration group. Initially, all students received information about pediatric PVC insertion through lecture. Then, their skill was assessed using a child mannequin in a skill lab by a thirty-item rating scale. Then, participants in the simulation and the demonstration groups received training about this skill through simulation or demonstration teaching methods. After 3 weeks, their skill was reassessed. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: The baseline total scores of PVC insertion skill were 17.66 ± 7.46, 14.93 ± 6.64, and 16.92 ± 10.38 and after intervention changed to 20.66 ± 5.65, 33.81 ± 6.86, and 41.14 ± 7.67 in the control, role play simulation, and demonstration groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant increase of skill in simulation and demonstration groups (P < 0.001), whereas the increase in the control group was insignificant (P = 0.09). There was no significant difference between role play simulation and demonstration groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both role play simulation and demonstration significantly improve pediatric PVC insertion skill among nursing students. These teaching methods are recommended for developing nursing skills.","PeriodicalId":45398,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_94_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The short course of baccalaureate nursing program and overcrowding of clinical settings restrict the development of pediatric peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion skill among nursing students. Therefore, better teaching strategies are needed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of role play simulation and demonstration on pediatric PVC insertion skill among nursing students. Methods: In this three-group experimental study, 46 nursing students were selected from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, randomly allocated to a control, a role play simulation, or a demonstration group. Initially, all students received information about pediatric PVC insertion through lecture. Then, their skill was assessed using a child mannequin in a skill lab by a thirty-item rating scale. Then, participants in the simulation and the demonstration groups received training about this skill through simulation or demonstration teaching methods. After 3 weeks, their skill was reassessed. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: The baseline total scores of PVC insertion skill were 17.66 ± 7.46, 14.93 ± 6.64, and 16.92 ± 10.38 and after intervention changed to 20.66 ± 5.65, 33.81 ± 6.86, and 41.14 ± 7.67 in the control, role play simulation, and demonstration groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant increase of skill in simulation and demonstration groups (P < 0.001), whereas the increase in the control group was insignificant (P = 0.09). There was no significant difference between role play simulation and demonstration groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both role play simulation and demonstration significantly improve pediatric PVC insertion skill among nursing students. These teaching methods are recommended for developing nursing skills.
角色扮演模拟演示对护生小儿外周静脉导管插入技能的影响:三组实验研究
背景:护理专业学士学位课程较短,临床环境过于拥挤,制约了护生儿科外周静脉导管(PVC)插入技能的发展。因此,需要更好的教学策略。目的:本研究的目的是比较角色扮演模拟和演示在护理学生中对儿科PVC插入技能的影响。方法:在这项三组实验研究中,46名来自伊朗大不里士医学科学大学的护理专业学生被随机分配到对照组、角色扮演模拟组或示范组。最初,所有学生都通过讲座获得了有关儿科PVC插入的信息。然后,在技能实验室用一个儿童人体模型,用30项评定量表对他们的技能进行评估。然后,模拟和演示小组的参与者通过模拟或演示教学方法接受有关该技能的培训。3周后,对他们的技能进行了重新评估。使用Wilcoxon和Kruskal–Wallis检验对数据进行分析。结果:对照组、角色扮演模拟组和示范组的PVC插入技能基线总分分别为17.66±7.46、14.93±6.64和16.92±10.38,干预后分别为20.66±5.65、33.81±6.86和41.14±7.67。模拟和演示组的技能有统计学意义的提高(P<0.001),而对照组的增加不显著(P=0.09)。角色扮演模拟组和演示组之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:角色扮演模拟和演示都显著提高了护生的儿科PVC插入技能。建议采用这些教学方法来培养护理技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信