{"title":"Partnership and Personalisation in Personal Care: Conflicts and Compromises","authors":"K. Rummery, J. Lawrence, Siabhainn Russell","doi":"10.1017/S1474746422000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Personalisation in social care services has become a feature of the delivery of long-term care for disabled people in many developed welfare states. Aim: Scotland has used the devolution of health and social care powers to develop a personalisation scheme (known as ‘Self-directed Support’). The authors apply a theoretical and empirical framework to understand the experience of contemporary disabled users of personalised services. Methods: The authors use a Scottish data set of six focus groups and a survey of 126 disabled people and family carers. Results: The data showed that flexible funding and the ability to provide services that cross agency boundaries were instrumental in moving towards equitable outcomes. Conclusions: Although there are clear policy and practice barriers to inter-agency working in personalised care services, the evidence suggests that it is worth investing in overcoming these barriers for disabled people and family carers.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"187 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background: Personalisation in social care services has become a feature of the delivery of long-term care for disabled people in many developed welfare states. Aim: Scotland has used the devolution of health and social care powers to develop a personalisation scheme (known as ‘Self-directed Support’). The authors apply a theoretical and empirical framework to understand the experience of contemporary disabled users of personalised services. Methods: The authors use a Scottish data set of six focus groups and a survey of 126 disabled people and family carers. Results: The data showed that flexible funding and the ability to provide services that cross agency boundaries were instrumental in moving towards equitable outcomes. Conclusions: Although there are clear policy and practice barriers to inter-agency working in personalised care services, the evidence suggests that it is worth investing in overcoming these barriers for disabled people and family carers.