Comparing Fine and Gross Motor Development in Normal Hearing Children, Rehabilitated, and Non-Rehabilitated Hearing-Impaired Children

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Parvin Veiskarami, M. Roozbahani, S. Saedi, E. Ghadampour
{"title":"Comparing Fine and Gross Motor Development in Normal Hearing Children, Rehabilitated, and Non-Rehabilitated Hearing-Impaired Children","authors":"Parvin Veiskarami, M. Roozbahani, S. Saedi, E. Ghadampour","doi":"10.18502/avr.v31i3.9871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Motor development is a continuous process throughout life. Hearing impairment in childhood may have significant effects on motor development. This study compared the motor development of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children at early developmental ages. \nMethods: This research was a cross-sectional study. A total of 149 children aged six to eighteen months were selected and divided into three groups: normal-hearing children (NHC) (55 girls and 65 boys) selected by convenient sampling strategy, non-rehabilitated hearing impaired children group (NRHIC) (11 girls and 13 boys) selected by purposive method, and rehabilitated hearing- impaired children group (RHIC) (3 girls and 2 boys) selected by the census method. The Denver developmental screening test 2 (DDST-ll) was used to assess motor development. The obtained data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U tests, and curve drawing. \nResults: The fine motor development of the NHC (9.63±28.83) was significantly greater than the RHIC (-18 ±26.83) and NRHIC (–21.25±30.26) groups, but there was no significant difference between the RHIC and NRHIC groups. In gross motor development, the NRHIC (–32.71±41.26) group had a more significant delay compared to the NHC (13.38±37.73) and RHIC (0±21.21) groups, but there was no significant difference between the NHC and RHIC groups. \nConclusion: Hearing rehabilitation can partially compensate for the developmental delay in gross skills, but this compensation has not occurred for fine motor skills. The development of fine motor skills requires a precise synergy of small muscles and the nervous system. \nKeywords: Deafness; hearing impaired rehabilitation; motor skills","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v31i3.9871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Motor development is a continuous process throughout life. Hearing impairment in childhood may have significant effects on motor development. This study compared the motor development of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children at early developmental ages. Methods: This research was a cross-sectional study. A total of 149 children aged six to eighteen months were selected and divided into three groups: normal-hearing children (NHC) (55 girls and 65 boys) selected by convenient sampling strategy, non-rehabilitated hearing impaired children group (NRHIC) (11 girls and 13 boys) selected by purposive method, and rehabilitated hearing- impaired children group (RHIC) (3 girls and 2 boys) selected by the census method. The Denver developmental screening test 2 (DDST-ll) was used to assess motor development. The obtained data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U tests, and curve drawing. Results: The fine motor development of the NHC (9.63±28.83) was significantly greater than the RHIC (-18 ±26.83) and NRHIC (–21.25±30.26) groups, but there was no significant difference between the RHIC and NRHIC groups. In gross motor development, the NRHIC (–32.71±41.26) group had a more significant delay compared to the NHC (13.38±37.73) and RHIC (0±21.21) groups, but there was no significant difference between the NHC and RHIC groups. Conclusion: Hearing rehabilitation can partially compensate for the developmental delay in gross skills, but this compensation has not occurred for fine motor skills. The development of fine motor skills requires a precise synergy of small muscles and the nervous system. Keywords: Deafness; hearing impaired rehabilitation; motor skills
正常听力儿童、康复儿童和未康复听力受损儿童精细和大体运动发育的比较
背景与目的:运动发育是一个贯穿一生的持续过程。儿童时期的听力障碍可能对运动发育有重大影响。本研究比较了听力正常儿童和听力受损儿童在发育早期的运动发育情况。方法:本研究为横断面研究。选取6 ~ 18月龄儿童149例,分为3组:采用方便抽样法选择正常听力儿童(NHC)(女孩55例,男孩65例),采用目的法选择非康复型听障儿童(NRHIC)(女孩11例,男孩13例),采用人口普查法选择康复型听障儿童(RHIC)(女孩3例,男孩2例)。采用丹佛发育筛查试验2 (ddst - 1)评估运动发育。通过Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和曲线绘制对所得数据进行分析。结果:NHC组的精细运动发育(9.63±28.83)显著高于RHIC组(-18±26.83)和NRHIC组(-21.25±30.26),但RHIC组与NRHIC组之间无显著差异。在大动作发展方面,NRHIC组(-32.71±41.26)比NHC组(13.38±37.73)和RHIC组(0±21.21)有更显著的延迟,但NHC组和RHIC组之间无显著差异。结论:听力康复可以部分补偿粗大技能的发展迟缓,但对精细运动技能的发展迟缓没有补偿作用。精细运动技能的发展需要小肌肉和神经系统的精确协同作用。关键词:耳聋;听力障碍康复;运动技能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信