Emotional Distraction by Constant Finger Tapping

Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI:10.1027/0269-8803/a000287
Sachiyo Ozawa, Hiromasa Yoshimoto, K. Okanoya, K. Hiraki
{"title":"Emotional Distraction by Constant Finger Tapping","authors":"Sachiyo Ozawa, Hiromasa Yoshimoto, K. Okanoya, K. Hiraki","doi":"10.1027/0269-8803/a000287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study examined the effects of emotional distraction in the context of recalling stressful interpersonal events in daily life. Previous studies have revealed that distraction decreases unpleasant emotions. In this study, we examined whether distraction tasks decrease unpleasant task-related thoughts in addition to unpleasant emotions. Furthermore, to investigate the implicit effects of emotional changes, we examined changes in pupil size in relation to unpleasant emotions and task-unrelated thoughts (TUT). The behavioral tasks were administered to 21 university students ( Mage = 21.24 ± 2.93 years; range: 18–30 years). After excluding participants for poor data quality, 16 (21.31 ± 3.34 years; 18–30 years) were included for further pupil data analysis. As an emotion induction procedure, participants were asked to freely recall memories of stressful interpersonal events in their daily lives and were given a series of questions about their recalled memories, which were presented on the monitor. In the following distraction experiment, questions during the emotion induction procedure were represented as emotional stimulation; a distraction task (non-constant or constant finger tapping) or rest condition was then performed; subsequently, ratings were given for attentional state, thought types conceived during the tasks, and emotional state. Upon analysis, differences in the ratings for unpleasant emotion and TUT were non-significant between all conditions. Nevertheless, pupil dilation in the non-constant and constant conditions was associated with decreased unpleasant emotions ( p < .05; p < .05 to .01). More importantly, pupil dilation was associated with decreased unpleasant TUT ( p < .05) only in the constant condition. Although the observed effects were subtle, we found that constant finger tapping decreased unpleasant emotions and TUT. It is expected for a future emotion regulation study to further investigate the effects in the relationships among emotions, thoughts, and physiological states, which can help in coping with unpleasant emotions.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. This study examined the effects of emotional distraction in the context of recalling stressful interpersonal events in daily life. Previous studies have revealed that distraction decreases unpleasant emotions. In this study, we examined whether distraction tasks decrease unpleasant task-related thoughts in addition to unpleasant emotions. Furthermore, to investigate the implicit effects of emotional changes, we examined changes in pupil size in relation to unpleasant emotions and task-unrelated thoughts (TUT). The behavioral tasks were administered to 21 university students ( Mage = 21.24 ± 2.93 years; range: 18–30 years). After excluding participants for poor data quality, 16 (21.31 ± 3.34 years; 18–30 years) were included for further pupil data analysis. As an emotion induction procedure, participants were asked to freely recall memories of stressful interpersonal events in their daily lives and were given a series of questions about their recalled memories, which were presented on the monitor. In the following distraction experiment, questions during the emotion induction procedure were represented as emotional stimulation; a distraction task (non-constant or constant finger tapping) or rest condition was then performed; subsequently, ratings were given for attentional state, thought types conceived during the tasks, and emotional state. Upon analysis, differences in the ratings for unpleasant emotion and TUT were non-significant between all conditions. Nevertheless, pupil dilation in the non-constant and constant conditions was associated with decreased unpleasant emotions ( p < .05; p < .05 to .01). More importantly, pupil dilation was associated with decreased unpleasant TUT ( p < .05) only in the constant condition. Although the observed effects were subtle, we found that constant finger tapping decreased unpleasant emotions and TUT. It is expected for a future emotion regulation study to further investigate the effects in the relationships among emotions, thoughts, and physiological states, which can help in coping with unpleasant emotions.
分享
查看原文
通过不断的手指敲击来分散情绪
摘要本研究考察了情绪干扰在回忆日常生活中有压力的人际事件中的作用。先前的研究表明,分心可以减少不愉快的情绪。在这项研究中,我们研究了分散注意力的任务是否会减少与任务相关的不愉快的想法和不愉快的情绪。此外,为了研究情绪变化的内隐效应,我们研究了瞳孔大小的变化与不愉快情绪和任务无关思想(TUT)的关系。对21名大学生(年龄= 21.24±2.93岁;范围:18-30年)。排除数据质量较差的参与者后,16(21.31±3.34年;18-30岁),进一步分析学生资料。作为一个情绪诱导过程,参与者被要求自由回忆日常生活中有压力的人际关系事件,并给出一系列关于他们回忆的问题,这些问题显示在监视器上。在接下来的分心实验中,情绪诱导过程中的问题被表征为情绪刺激;然后进行分心任务(不恒定或恒定的手指敲击)或休息条件;随后,对注意力状态、任务中构思的思维类型和情绪状态进行评分。经分析,在所有条件下,不愉快情绪和TUT评分的差异不显著。然而,非恒定和恒定条件下的瞳孔扩张与不愉快情绪的减少有关(p < 0.05;P < 0.05 ~ 0.01)。更重要的是,只有在恒定条件下,瞳孔扩张与令人不快的TUT减少有关(p < 0.05)。虽然观察到的效果很微妙,但我们发现不断的手指敲击可以减少不愉快的情绪和TUT。未来的情绪调节研究将进一步探讨情绪、思想和生理状态之间的关系,以帮助应对不愉快的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信