On learning and unlearning

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Papastephanou, Kalli Drousioti
{"title":"On learning and unlearning","authors":"M. Papastephanou, Kalli Drousioti","doi":"10.1177/14782103231176605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of learning has obtained great popularity in many fields. In common cause with neo-liberal ideology, learning has led to a learnification process that turns social pathologies into individual deficits. Various ways out of this situation have been sought; chief among them is the recruitment of unlearning as a promising negation of learning and of its politics. Educational-philosophical, sociological, decolonial, as well as organizational and policy discourses valorize unlearning for different and often opposing reasons. However, as this article shows, unlearning has already been co-opted and utilized by learning discourses to advance the neo-liberal conception of learning. A further reaction to this usurpation of unlearning has been a tendency to premodify unlearning as ‘critical’ or ‘deep’. The present article critiques these conceptualizations and operationalizations of unlearning and argues for a more complex outlook on learning and unlearning than that which is currently predominant.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231176605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of learning has obtained great popularity in many fields. In common cause with neo-liberal ideology, learning has led to a learnification process that turns social pathologies into individual deficits. Various ways out of this situation have been sought; chief among them is the recruitment of unlearning as a promising negation of learning and of its politics. Educational-philosophical, sociological, decolonial, as well as organizational and policy discourses valorize unlearning for different and often opposing reasons. However, as this article shows, unlearning has already been co-opted and utilized by learning discourses to advance the neo-liberal conception of learning. A further reaction to this usurpation of unlearning has been a tendency to premodify unlearning as ‘critical’ or ‘deep’. The present article critiques these conceptualizations and operationalizations of unlearning and argues for a more complex outlook on learning and unlearning than that which is currently predominant.
论学习与遗忘
学习的概念在许多领域都很流行。与新自由主义意识形态的共同原因是,学习导致了一个将社会病态转化为个人缺陷的学习过程。人们一直在寻求摆脱这种局面的各种途径;其中最主要的是将遗忘作为对学习及其政治的一种有希望的否定。出于不同且往往相反的原因,教育哲学、社会学、非殖民化以及组织和政策话语都重视遗忘。然而,正如本文所表明的,遗忘已经被学习话语所吸收和利用,以推进新自由主义的学习观。对这种对遗忘的篡夺的进一步反应是,有一种将遗忘预先定义为“批判性”或“深度”的倾向。本文批评了遗忘的这些概念化和操作化,并主张对学习和遗忘的看法比目前主流的看法更为复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信