Plutarch, Ἀνδρεία, and Rome

Sulochana Asirvatham
{"title":"Plutarch, Ἀνδρεία, and Rome","authors":"Sulochana Asirvatham","doi":"10.5406/illiclasstud.44.1.0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In Coriolanus 1.4, Plutarch criticizes the Romans for having only one term to encompass all of virtue: virtūs. With its \"manly\" vir-root, virtūs directly translates Greek ἀνδρεία, but leaves out much of the entire range of virtues represented by Greek ἀρετή. Through his manipulation of ἀνδρεία and related words, Plutarch asserts not only that virtūs is as Greek as it is Roman, but also that virtūs alone is not enough to make a vir. Plutarch ultimately appears to identify masculinity self-reflexively, as the ability to wield intellectual authority over all spheres of ἀρετή, including the ethical, political, and military.","PeriodicalId":81501,"journal":{"name":"Illinois classical studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"156 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illinois classical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.44.1.0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In Coriolanus 1.4, Plutarch criticizes the Romans for having only one term to encompass all of virtue: virtūs. With its "manly" vir-root, virtūs directly translates Greek ἀνδρεία, but leaves out much of the entire range of virtues represented by Greek ἀρετή. Through his manipulation of ἀνδρεία and related words, Plutarch asserts not only that virtūs is as Greek as it is Roman, but also that virtūs alone is not enough to make a vir. Plutarch ultimately appears to identify masculinity self-reflexively, as the ability to wield intellectual authority over all spheres of ἀρετή, including the ethical, political, and military.
普鲁塔克、安德里亚和罗马
摘要:在Coriolanus 1.4中,普鲁塔克批评罗马人只有一个术语来涵盖所有美德:virtús。virtús的“man”vir词根直接翻译成希腊语ἀεία,但忽略了希腊语所代表的所有美德ἀρετί。通过他对ἀμδρεία和相关的词,普鲁塔克不仅断言virtús和罗马一样是希腊语,而且认为光靠virtās不足以制造vir。普鲁塔克最终似乎自我反射地认同了男子气概,认为这是一种在所有领域行使智力权威的能力ἀρετή, 包括伦理、政治和军事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信