Developing theory-based text messages to support retention in clinical trials: A mixed methods approach

Sophie M C Green, Erin Raine, L. Hall, M. Collinson, Ellen Mason, K. Gillies, D. French, Y. K. Bartlett, S. Hartley, R. Foy, A. Farrin, Samuel G Smith
{"title":"Developing theory-based text messages to support retention in clinical trials: A mixed methods approach","authors":"Sophie M C Green, Erin Raine, L. Hall, M. Collinson, Ellen Mason, K. Gillies, D. French, Y. K. Bartlett, S. Hartley, R. Foy, A. Farrin, Samuel G Smith","doi":"10.1177/26320843211069530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Returning a trial questionnaire is a behaviour affected by a range of psychological and contextual factors. Previously tested Short Message Service (SMS) messages to prompt questionnaire return have not addressed these factors, and have not been characterised by established taxonomies of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Purpose: We aimed to develop acceptable theory-based SMS messages, with fidelity to four BCTs, to support participant understanding of the consequences of not returning trial questionnaires. Methods and Results: We initially developed 32 messages. Ten behaviour change experts assessed message fidelity to the intended BCT (Study 1a). All messages had appropriate fidelity to the intended BCT (mean ratings = 6.8/10 [SD = 0.6) to 7.5/10 [SD = 0.3]). Study 1b, a focus group with five patient representatives, recommended removing the BCT ‘comparative imagining of future outcomes’ (4 messages), two further messages be removed, and amendments to five messages. In Study 1c, 60 breast cancer survivors rated all remaining 26 messages as acceptable (mean = 3.8/5 [SD = 1.2] to 4.3/5 [SD = 0.8]). Twelve behaviour change experts rated the fidelity of the 26 messages to intended BCTs (Study 1d); all messages had appropriate fidelity (mean ratings = 6.1/10 [SD = 2.4] to 6.9/10 [SD = 1.4]). Conclusions: In these studies, we developed 26 SMS messages that were acceptable to the intended recipients and had sufficient fidelity to the intended BCTs. This approach could be taken to design interventions supporting behaviours needed for the successful delivery of clinical trials. The messages are available to research teams who can evaluate them in Studies within Trials.","PeriodicalId":74683,"journal":{"name":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"22 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research methods in medicine & health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843211069530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Returning a trial questionnaire is a behaviour affected by a range of psychological and contextual factors. Previously tested Short Message Service (SMS) messages to prompt questionnaire return have not addressed these factors, and have not been characterised by established taxonomies of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Purpose: We aimed to develop acceptable theory-based SMS messages, with fidelity to four BCTs, to support participant understanding of the consequences of not returning trial questionnaires. Methods and Results: We initially developed 32 messages. Ten behaviour change experts assessed message fidelity to the intended BCT (Study 1a). All messages had appropriate fidelity to the intended BCT (mean ratings = 6.8/10 [SD = 0.6) to 7.5/10 [SD = 0.3]). Study 1b, a focus group with five patient representatives, recommended removing the BCT ‘comparative imagining of future outcomes’ (4 messages), two further messages be removed, and amendments to five messages. In Study 1c, 60 breast cancer survivors rated all remaining 26 messages as acceptable (mean = 3.8/5 [SD = 1.2] to 4.3/5 [SD = 0.8]). Twelve behaviour change experts rated the fidelity of the 26 messages to intended BCTs (Study 1d); all messages had appropriate fidelity (mean ratings = 6.1/10 [SD = 2.4] to 6.9/10 [SD = 1.4]). Conclusions: In these studies, we developed 26 SMS messages that were acceptable to the intended recipients and had sufficient fidelity to the intended BCTs. This approach could be taken to design interventions supporting behaviours needed for the successful delivery of clinical trials. The messages are available to research teams who can evaluate them in Studies within Trials.
发展基于理论的短信以支持临床试验中的保留:一种混合方法方法
背景:返回试验问卷是一种受一系列心理和情境因素影响的行为。以前测试过的短信服务(SMS)信息用于提示问卷返回,但没有解决这些因素,也没有以行为改变技术(BCT)的既定分类法为特征。目的:我们旨在开发可接受的基于理论的短信,忠实于四个BCT,以支持参与者理解不返回试验问卷的后果。方法和结果:我们最初开发了32条消息。10名行为改变专家评估了信息对预期作战旅的保真度(研究1a)。所有信息都与预期BCT具有适当的保真度(平均评分=6.8/10[SD=0.6)至7.5/10[SD=0.3])。研究1b是一个由五名患者代表组成的焦点小组,建议删除BCT“对未来结果的比较想象”(4条信息),再删除两条信息,并修改五条信息。在研究1c中,60名癌症乳腺癌幸存者将其余26条信息评为可接受(平均值为3.8/5[SD=1.2]至4.3/5[SD=0.8])。12名行为改变专家对26条信息与预期BCT的保真度进行了评级(研究1d);所有短信都具有适当的保真度(平均评分=6.1/10[SD=2.4]至6.9/10[SD=1.4])。结论:在这些研究中,我们开发了26条短信,这些短信对预期的接收者来说是可以接受的,并且对预期的BCT有足够的保真度。可以采用这种方法来设计干预措施,支持成功进行临床试验所需的行为。这些信息可供研究团队使用,他们可以在试验研究中对其进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信