Basic concepts and definitions of the PAS design and decision system

M. Arkesteijn
{"title":"Basic concepts and definitions of the PAS design and decision system","authors":"M. Arkesteijn","doi":"10.7480/ABE.2019.12.4129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, using basic concepts and definitions from management science, decision theory and design methodology, I shall outline the methodological aspects, characteristics and features of the Preference-based Accommodation Strategy (PAS) design and decision system, which I developed for the formation of a corporate accommodation strategy. \nThis outline serves first and foremost as a simple way of representing and modeling the PAS design decision system. It also enables the methodological characteristics of PAS design and decision making to be set out in a way that allows analysis and evaluation of the suitability of the applications of this system in real life corporate accommodation strategy processes. Finally, it should be possible to incorporate past experience into the framework, and to generalize and summarize it in order to benefit the further development of the PAS design decision system. The PAS design decision system will be referred to as PAS. \nIn chapter 2 the existing alignment models were assessed on eight different assessment criteria and it has become clear that decision making receives very little attention in the models. The two main problems were that (1) it remained unclear how alternative CRE strategies are made on portfolio and building level and (2) most problems occur when selecting an alternative; none of the models has an overall performance measure that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative criteria, and uses correct measurement. Although in paragraph 2.2 all assessment criteria have been introduced, some of the concepts will be explained in this chapter. In chapter 2.3 the models have been assessed on their use of correct measurement for instance. In paragraph 3.2 it will be explained what correct measurement is and why it is important. \nThe chapter is structured as follows: \n–– Fifteen basic concepts underlying the PAS design system are explained in paragraph 3.1; \n–– Preference measurement as core concept is explained in more detail in paragraph 3.2; \n–– Preference-Based Design as other core concept is explained in more detail in paragraph 3.3; \n–– A comparison of the foundations in different scientific field in given in paragraph 3.4; \n–– The chapter ends with a conclusion and comparison in paragraph 3.5.","PeriodicalId":30436,"journal":{"name":"ABE Architecture and the Built Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"91-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABE Architecture and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7480/ABE.2019.12.4129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, using basic concepts and definitions from management science, decision theory and design methodology, I shall outline the methodological aspects, characteristics and features of the Preference-based Accommodation Strategy (PAS) design and decision system, which I developed for the formation of a corporate accommodation strategy. This outline serves first and foremost as a simple way of representing and modeling the PAS design decision system. It also enables the methodological characteristics of PAS design and decision making to be set out in a way that allows analysis and evaluation of the suitability of the applications of this system in real life corporate accommodation strategy processes. Finally, it should be possible to incorporate past experience into the framework, and to generalize and summarize it in order to benefit the further development of the PAS design decision system. The PAS design decision system will be referred to as PAS. In chapter 2 the existing alignment models were assessed on eight different assessment criteria and it has become clear that decision making receives very little attention in the models. The two main problems were that (1) it remained unclear how alternative CRE strategies are made on portfolio and building level and (2) most problems occur when selecting an alternative; none of the models has an overall performance measure that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative criteria, and uses correct measurement. Although in paragraph 2.2 all assessment criteria have been introduced, some of the concepts will be explained in this chapter. In chapter 2.3 the models have been assessed on their use of correct measurement for instance. In paragraph 3.2 it will be explained what correct measurement is and why it is important. The chapter is structured as follows: –– Fifteen basic concepts underlying the PAS design system are explained in paragraph 3.1; –– Preference measurement as core concept is explained in more detail in paragraph 3.2; –– Preference-Based Design as other core concept is explained in more detail in paragraph 3.3; –– A comparison of the foundations in different scientific field in given in paragraph 3.4; –– The chapter ends with a conclusion and comparison in paragraph 3.5.
PAS设计和决策系统的基本概念和定义
在本章中,我将利用管理科学、决策理论和设计方法论的基本概念和定义,概述基于偏好的适应策略(PAS)设计和决策系统的方法论方面、特征和特点,该系统是我为形成企业适应策略而开发的。该大纲首先是PAS设计决策系统的一种简单表示和建模方法。它还使PAS设计和决策的方法特征能够以一种能够分析和评估该系统在现实生活中的公司通融战略过程中的适用性的方式进行阐述。最后,应当能够将过去的经验纳入该框架,并加以概括和总结,以便有利于PAS设计决策系统的进一步发展。PAS设计决策系统将被称为PAS。在第2章中,根据八种不同的评估标准对现有的对齐模型进行了评估,很明显,决策在模型中很少受到关注。两个主要问题是:(1)尚不清楚如何在投资组合和建筑层面制定替代CRE策略;(2)大多数问题发生在选择替代方案时;没有一个模型有一个综合了定量和定性标准的整体绩效衡量标准,并使用了正确的衡量标准。尽管在第2.2段中介绍了所有评估标准,但本章将对其中一些概念进行解释。例如,在第2.3章中,对模型使用正确测量进行了评估。在第3.2段中,将解释什么是正确的测量以及为什么它很重要。本章结构如下:––第3.1段解释了PAS设计系统的15个基本概念;–作为核心概念的偏好测量在第3.2段中有更详细的解释基于偏好的设计作为其他核心概念在第3.3段中有更详细的解释第3.4段中给出的不同科学领域基础的比较本章最后在第3.5段中进行了总结和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书