Agung Adi, I. M. Suastra, Ida Bagus Gde Yudha Triguna, Ida Bagus Gde Pujaastawa
{"title":"THE CONTROVERSY OVER SAMPRADAYA AND THE DYNAMICS OF HINDU INSTITUTION: CONTESTATION OF HINDU ELITES IN PALANGKA RAYA CITY","authors":"Agung Adi, I. M. Suastra, Ida Bagus Gde Yudha Triguna, Ida Bagus Gde Pujaastawa","doi":"10.24843/cs.2023.v16.i01.p04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is intended to analyze the controversy over sampradaya and the dynamics of Hindu institutions in general and ‘The Indonesia Administrative Council of Hindu Dharma’ Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia (PHDI) in particular in Palangka Raya City. The existence of sampradaya, as a transnational organization, has triggered an internal contestation among the Hindu elites. Being a qualitative study, this current study applies the approach of cultural studies, and emphasizes the different ways of interpreting one phenomenon. The data were obtained from the informants purposively chosen; therefore, they are categorized as the primary data source. The secondary data were obtained from the online and offline books available in the library, documents, articles and research results. The data were analyzed interactively in which Milles and Huberman were referred to. The data analysis includes the data reduction, the data presentation, the conclusion withdrawal or the data verification and interpretation. The results and discussion show that the controversy and contestation more dominantly result from the impact of globalization indicated by the dialectic process of affecting each other between the particularity referring to the symbols of the Bali Hindu identity, as one of the Hindu identities in Indonesia which is obliged to be maintained, and the universality, as the Hindu identity referring to the Indian culture, whose followers have spread all over the world. \nKeywords: sampradaya, PHDI, elite, Bali Hindu","PeriodicalId":30770,"journal":{"name":"EJournal of Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJournal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/cs.2023.v16.i01.p04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article is intended to analyze the controversy over sampradaya and the dynamics of Hindu institutions in general and ‘The Indonesia Administrative Council of Hindu Dharma’ Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia (PHDI) in particular in Palangka Raya City. The existence of sampradaya, as a transnational organization, has triggered an internal contestation among the Hindu elites. Being a qualitative study, this current study applies the approach of cultural studies, and emphasizes the different ways of interpreting one phenomenon. The data were obtained from the informants purposively chosen; therefore, they are categorized as the primary data source. The secondary data were obtained from the online and offline books available in the library, documents, articles and research results. The data were analyzed interactively in which Milles and Huberman were referred to. The data analysis includes the data reduction, the data presentation, the conclusion withdrawal or the data verification and interpretation. The results and discussion show that the controversy and contestation more dominantly result from the impact of globalization indicated by the dialectic process of affecting each other between the particularity referring to the symbols of the Bali Hindu identity, as one of the Hindu identities in Indonesia which is obliged to be maintained, and the universality, as the Hindu identity referring to the Indian culture, whose followers have spread all over the world.
Keywords: sampradaya, PHDI, elite, Bali Hindu
本文旨在分析有关sampradaya的争议,以及印度教机构的总体动态,特别是在Palangka Raya市的“印度尼西亚印度教达摩行政委员会”(Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia, PHDI)。sampradaya作为一个跨国组织的存在,引发了印度教精英之间的内部争论。本研究是一种定性研究,采用文化研究的方法,强调对同一现象的不同解释。数据是从有意选择的举报人那里获得的;因此,它们被归类为主要数据源。辅助数据来源于图书馆的线上和线下图书、文献、文章和研究成果。这些数据被交互式地分析,并参考了米勒和休伯曼。数据分析包括数据还原、数据呈现、结论提取或数据验证与解释。结果和讨论表明,争论和争论更多的是全球化影响的结果,这一影响表现为巴厘岛印度教身份的特殊性(作为印度尼西亚必须保持的印度教身份之一)与印度文化的普遍性(其追随者遍布世界各地)之间相互影响的辩证过程。关键词:sampradaya, PHDI,精英,巴厘岛印度教