Dialectic Freedom: Between Positive and Negative Freedom —A Philosophical Study of the Necessity of Political Freedom and Democracy Inspired by the “Dubai Experience”

Loulou Malaeb
{"title":"Dialectic Freedom: Between Positive and Negative Freedom —A Philosophical Study of the Necessity of Political Freedom and Democracy Inspired by the “Dubai Experience”","authors":"Loulou Malaeb","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2021.113028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper inspects the form of freedom that exists in Dubai to make \npeople living in the city happy and satisfied. I ponder Berlin’s two notions of \nnegative and positive freedom to see whether these notions can truly \ncategorically exclude one another in the definition of freedom, and if so, \nwhich one applies in Dubai. I base my research on the assumption that the aim \nof every political/economic system is to make people happy and that the way to \npeople’s happiness is through the satisfaction of their desires of survival and well-be-ing. \nThe results I succumb to show that Berlin’s two notions of freedom are intricately related on many levels: both partisans \nof positive and negative freedom \nseem to disregard the fact that, the subjectivity suggested by negative freedom \ndoes not exclude the presence of an objective element in negative freedom and, \nconsequently the objectivity suggested by positive freedom does not exclude the \npresence of a subjective element in it. The categorically dualistic conception of freedom suggested by Berlin would thus be incomplete and the necessity of freedom would dwell in a form of a dialectic synthesis between negative and positive freedom, \nthat which I call Dialectic Freedom. This is the form of freedom that prevails in Dubai.","PeriodicalId":91152,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2021.113028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper inspects the form of freedom that exists in Dubai to make people living in the city happy and satisfied. I ponder Berlin’s two notions of negative and positive freedom to see whether these notions can truly categorically exclude one another in the definition of freedom, and if so, which one applies in Dubai. I base my research on the assumption that the aim of every political/economic system is to make people happy and that the way to people’s happiness is through the satisfaction of their desires of survival and well-be-ing. The results I succumb to show that Berlin’s two notions of freedom are intricately related on many levels: both partisans of positive and negative freedom seem to disregard the fact that, the subjectivity suggested by negative freedom does not exclude the presence of an objective element in negative freedom and, consequently the objectivity suggested by positive freedom does not exclude the presence of a subjective element in it. The categorically dualistic conception of freedom suggested by Berlin would thus be incomplete and the necessity of freedom would dwell in a form of a dialectic synthesis between negative and positive freedom, that which I call Dialectic Freedom. This is the form of freedom that prevails in Dubai.
辩证自由:在积极自由与消极自由之间——从“迪拜经验”看政治自由与民主的必要性
本文考察了迪拜存在的自由形式,以使生活在城市中的人们感到幸福和满足。我思考柏林关于消极自由和积极自由的两个概念,看看这些概念是否真的能在自由的定义中明确地相互排斥,如果是,哪一个适用于迪拜。我的研究基于这样一种假设,即每一种政治/经济制度的目的都是让人们幸福,而人们幸福的途径是通过满足他们的生存和幸福愿望。我所屈服的结果表明,柏林的两个自由概念在许多层面上都有着错综复杂的联系:积极自由和消极自由的支持者似乎都忽视了这样一个事实,即消极自由所暗示的主观性并不排除消极自由中客观因素的存在,因此,积极自由所提出的客观性并不排除其中存在主观因素。因此,柏林所提出的明确的二元自由观是不完整的,自由的必要性将停留在消极自由和积极自由之间的辩证综合形式中,我称之为辩证自由。这就是迪拜盛行的自由形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信