Corpus Coranicum From Philology to Literary Analysis: Critical Vision

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
Samer Rashwani
{"title":"Corpus Coranicum From Philology to Literary Analysis: Critical Vision","authors":"Samer Rashwani","doi":"10.29117/jcsis.2020.0256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corpus Coranicum is a research project launched in 2007 by the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. This project has been the subject of different interpretations with respect to its objectives and context. While certain involved parties have envisioned a scientific breakthrough that will end with a critical edition of the Quran, and ergo aggravate Muslim antagonism toward the West, other scholars have not perceived any breakthrough or originality either in approach or vision. This project seems to be a type of digital treasury of the Western contribution to Quranic studies since the 19th century. It amalgamates classical philological investigations, material history studies (i.e., inscriptions, paleography, genealogy) and modern literary analysis. \nBy evaluating parts of its published data, this paper aims to scrutinize the method, the epistemological premises and the rigorousness of this digital corpus. Regretfully, the results of this examination reveal that the Quranic variances database is so faulty that no reliable historical critical analysis can based on it. The process of collecting the textual material of the religious and cultural milieu of the Quran does not attend to hermeneutical questions, translation problems or double interpretation (i.e., the Quranic text and its parallel sub-text).","PeriodicalId":40091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2020.0256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Corpus Coranicum is a research project launched in 2007 by the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. This project has been the subject of different interpretations with respect to its objectives and context. While certain involved parties have envisioned a scientific breakthrough that will end with a critical edition of the Quran, and ergo aggravate Muslim antagonism toward the West, other scholars have not perceived any breakthrough or originality either in approach or vision. This project seems to be a type of digital treasury of the Western contribution to Quranic studies since the 19th century. It amalgamates classical philological investigations, material history studies (i.e., inscriptions, paleography, genealogy) and modern literary analysis. By evaluating parts of its published data, this paper aims to scrutinize the method, the epistemological premises and the rigorousness of this digital corpus. Regretfully, the results of this examination reveal that the Quranic variances database is so faulty that no reliable historical critical analysis can based on it. The process of collecting the textual material of the religious and cultural milieu of the Quran does not attend to hermeneutical questions, translation problems or double interpretation (i.e., the Quranic text and its parallel sub-text).
从文献学到文学分析:批判视野
Coranicum是柏林-勃兰登堡科学与人文学院于2007年启动的一项研究项目。这个项目就其目标和背景有不同的解释。虽然某些相关方已经设想了一个科学突破,最终将以古兰经的批判版本结束,从而加剧穆斯林对西方的敌意,但其他学者并没有在方法或愿景上看到任何突破或独创性。这个项目似乎是自19世纪以来西方对古兰经研究贡献的一种数字宝库。它结合了古典文献学调查,材料历史研究(即,铭文,古文字,家谱)和现代文学分析。通过评估其部分已发表的数据,本文旨在仔细研究该数字语料库的方法,认识论前提和严谨性。遗憾的是,这次检查的结果显示,古兰经的差异数据库是如此的错误,没有可靠的历史批判分析可以基于它。收集《古兰经》宗教和文化背景的文本材料的过程不涉及解释学问题、翻译问题或双重解释(即《古兰经》文本及其平行的副文本)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书