Contribution of farms to the microbiota in the swine value chain

Pascal Laforge, A. T. Vincent, C. Duchaine, Perrine Feutry, Annick Dion-Fortier, Pier-Luc Plante, Éric Pouliot, S. Fournaise, L. Saucier
{"title":"Contribution of farms to the microbiota in the swine value chain","authors":"Pascal Laforge, A. T. Vincent, C. Duchaine, Perrine Feutry, Annick Dion-Fortier, Pier-Luc Plante, Éric Pouliot, S. Fournaise, L. Saucier","doi":"10.3389/fsysb.2023.1183868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A thorough understanding of the microbial ecology within the swine value chain is essential to develop new strategies to optimize the microbiological quality of pork products. To our knowledge, no study to date has followed the microbiota through the value chain from live farm animals to the cuts of meat obtained for market. The objective of this study is to evaluate how the microbiota of pigs and their environment influence the microbial composition of samples collected throughout the value chain, including the meat plant and meat cuts.Method and results: Results from 16S rDNA sequencing, short-chain fatty acid concentrations and metabolomic analysis of pig feces revealed that the microbiota from two farms with differing sanitary statuses were distinctive. The total aerobic mesophilic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae counts from samples collected at the meat plant after the pre-operation cleaning and disinfection steps were at or around the detection limit and the pigs from the selected farms were the first to be slaughtered on each shipment days. The bacterial counts of individual samples collected at the meat plant did not vary significantly between the farms. Alpha diversity results indicate that as we move through the steps in the value chain, there is a clear reduction in the diversity of the microbiota. A beta diversity analysis revealed a more distinct microbiota at the farms compared to the meat plant which change and became more uniform as samples were taken towards the end of the value chain. The source tracker analysis showed that only 12.92% of the microbiota in shoulder samples originated from the farms and 81% of the bacteria detected on the dressed carcasses were of unknown origin.Discussion: Overall, the results suggest that with the current level of microbial control at farms, it is possible to obtain pork products with similar microbiological quality from different farms. However, broader studies are required to determine the impact of the sanitary status of the herd on the final products.","PeriodicalId":73109,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in systems biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in systems biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsysb.2023.1183868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A thorough understanding of the microbial ecology within the swine value chain is essential to develop new strategies to optimize the microbiological quality of pork products. To our knowledge, no study to date has followed the microbiota through the value chain from live farm animals to the cuts of meat obtained for market. The objective of this study is to evaluate how the microbiota of pigs and their environment influence the microbial composition of samples collected throughout the value chain, including the meat plant and meat cuts.Method and results: Results from 16S rDNA sequencing, short-chain fatty acid concentrations and metabolomic analysis of pig feces revealed that the microbiota from two farms with differing sanitary statuses were distinctive. The total aerobic mesophilic bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae counts from samples collected at the meat plant after the pre-operation cleaning and disinfection steps were at or around the detection limit and the pigs from the selected farms were the first to be slaughtered on each shipment days. The bacterial counts of individual samples collected at the meat plant did not vary significantly between the farms. Alpha diversity results indicate that as we move through the steps in the value chain, there is a clear reduction in the diversity of the microbiota. A beta diversity analysis revealed a more distinct microbiota at the farms compared to the meat plant which change and became more uniform as samples were taken towards the end of the value chain. The source tracker analysis showed that only 12.92% of the microbiota in shoulder samples originated from the farms and 81% of the bacteria detected on the dressed carcasses were of unknown origin.Discussion: Overall, the results suggest that with the current level of microbial control at farms, it is possible to obtain pork products with similar microbiological quality from different farms. However, broader studies are required to determine the impact of the sanitary status of the herd on the final products.
猪场对猪价值链中微生物群的贡献
导言:深入了解猪价值链中的微生物生态对于制定优化猪肉产品微生物质量的新策略至关重要。据我们所知,迄今为止还没有研究跟踪微生物群从活的农场动物到市场上获得的肉类的整个价值链。本研究的目的是评估猪的微生物群及其环境如何影响整个价值链中收集的样品的微生物组成,包括肉类工厂和肉类切割。方法与结果:对猪粪进行16S rDNA测序、短链脂肪酸浓度和代谢组学分析,结果表明卫生状况不同的两个猪场的微生物群存在差异。在操作前的清洁和消毒步骤后,从肉类工厂收集的样本中,有氧嗜温细菌和肠杆菌科细菌总数达到或接近检测限,并且在每个装运日,来自选定农场的猪首先被屠宰。在肉厂收集的单个样本的细菌计数在农场之间没有显着差异。α多样性结果表明,随着我们在价值链中移动的步骤,微生物群的多样性明显减少。一项beta多样性分析显示,与肉类工厂相比,农场的微生物群更加独特,随着样本走向价值链的末端,肉类工厂的微生物群会发生变化,并变得更加均匀。来源跟踪分析显示,肩部样品中仅有12.92%的微生物群来自养殖场,在屠宰后的胴体上检测到的细菌中有81%来源不明。讨论:总体而言,结果表明,以目前农场的微生物控制水平,有可能从不同的农场获得微生物质量相似的猪肉产品。但是,需要进行更广泛的研究,以确定畜群的卫生状况对最终产品的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信