The value of multiparametric MRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in the detection of clinical significant prostate cancer

Q4 Medicine
Ximing Wang, J. Bao, Chunhong Hu, Zhongshuai Zhang, Qi-lin Xi, Jianquan Hou, Han Li, Zhuxin Wei
{"title":"The value of multiparametric MRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in the detection of clinical significant prostate cancer","authors":"Ximing Wang, J. Bao, Chunhong Hu, Zhongshuai Zhang, Qi-lin Xi, Jianquan Hou, Han Li, Zhuxin Wei","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the application of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion guided biopsy in the diagnosis of clinical significant prostate cancer (PCa). \n \n \nMethods \nA prospective analysis was performed in 168 patients with suspected PCa from September 2015 to June 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Suspicious areas on mpMRl were defined and graded using prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS V2) score. All the patients had the TRUS-guided systematic biopsy, 108 patients with PI-RAD V2 scores ≥ 3 had additional MRI-TRUS targeted biopsies. Taking pathologic results as golden standard, the detection rates were compared between the 2 methods using χ2 test. \n \n \nResults \nInitially, all of the 168 patients underwent TRUS biopsy. PCa was detected in 86 (101 niduses) of 168 patients (51.19%, 86/168), 82 (91 niduses) (48.81%, 82/168) were not prostate cancer. Seventy eight (46.43%, 78/168) cases of PCa were detected by TRUS biopsy, and 63 (58.33%, 63/168) cases of PCa were detected by MRI-TRUS fusion guided biopsy, the difference was statistically significant between TRUS biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion guided biopsy (χ2=3.73, P=0.035). The 168 patients were biopsied with a total of 2 300 cores, including TRUS biopsy 2 016 cores and MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy 284 cores. Additionally, the detection rate for per cores for MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (51.76%, 147/284) was significantly higher than that for TRUS biopsy cores (19.64%, 396/2 016) (χ2=142.38,P<0.05). Among patients with a positive biopsy for PCa, the biopsy cores for conventional TRUS biopsy was 1 032 comparing to 214 cores for MRI-TRUS biopsy. The suspicious MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (68.69%, 147/214) detected more PCa compared with TRUS biopsy (38.37%, 396/1 032) (χ2=66.27, P<0.05). Among patients with a positive biopsy for PCa, MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy [69.74% (106/152)] detected more significant cancer cores than TRUS biopsy [54.50% (351/644) ] (χ2=11.67, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nMRI-TRUS fusion biopsy combined with PI-RADS V2 increases positive rate markedly and improves the detection rate of clinical significant PCa. \n \n \nKey words: \nProstate neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasound","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion guided biopsy in the diagnosis of clinical significant prostate cancer (PCa). Methods A prospective analysis was performed in 168 patients with suspected PCa from September 2015 to June 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Suspicious areas on mpMRl were defined and graded using prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS V2) score. All the patients had the TRUS-guided systematic biopsy, 108 patients with PI-RAD V2 scores ≥ 3 had additional MRI-TRUS targeted biopsies. Taking pathologic results as golden standard, the detection rates were compared between the 2 methods using χ2 test. Results Initially, all of the 168 patients underwent TRUS biopsy. PCa was detected in 86 (101 niduses) of 168 patients (51.19%, 86/168), 82 (91 niduses) (48.81%, 82/168) were not prostate cancer. Seventy eight (46.43%, 78/168) cases of PCa were detected by TRUS biopsy, and 63 (58.33%, 63/168) cases of PCa were detected by MRI-TRUS fusion guided biopsy, the difference was statistically significant between TRUS biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion guided biopsy (χ2=3.73, P=0.035). The 168 patients were biopsied with a total of 2 300 cores, including TRUS biopsy 2 016 cores and MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy 284 cores. Additionally, the detection rate for per cores for MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (51.76%, 147/284) was significantly higher than that for TRUS biopsy cores (19.64%, 396/2 016) (χ2=142.38,P<0.05). Among patients with a positive biopsy for PCa, the biopsy cores for conventional TRUS biopsy was 1 032 comparing to 214 cores for MRI-TRUS biopsy. The suspicious MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (68.69%, 147/214) detected more PCa compared with TRUS biopsy (38.37%, 396/1 032) (χ2=66.27, P<0.05). Among patients with a positive biopsy for PCa, MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy [69.74% (106/152)] detected more significant cancer cores than TRUS biopsy [54.50% (351/644) ] (χ2=11.67, P<0.05). Conclusion MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy combined with PI-RADS V2 increases positive rate markedly and improves the detection rate of clinical significant PCa. Key words: Prostate neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Transrectal ultrasound
多参数MRI和经直肠超声融合引导活检在诊断临床显著前列腺癌症中的价值
目的探讨多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合引导活检在临床意义的前列腺癌(PCa)诊断中的应用价值。方法对2015年9月至2017年6月苏州大学第一附属医院168例疑似PCa患者进行前瞻性分析。mpMRl上可疑区域的定义和分级采用前列腺成像报告和数据系统版本2 (PI-RADS V2)评分。所有患者均行trus引导下的系统活检,PI-RAD V2评分≥3分的108例患者行MRI-TRUS靶向活检。以病理结果为金标准,采用χ2检验比较两种方法的检出率。结果最初,所有168例患者均行TRUS活检。168例患者中有86例(101个病灶)检出前列腺癌(51.19%,86/168),82例(91个病灶)未检出前列腺癌(48.81%,82/168)。TRUS活检检出PCa 78例(46.43%,78/168),MRI-TRUS融合引导活检检出PCa 63例(58.33%,63/168),两者差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.73, P=0.035)。168例患者共行活检2 300个核,其中TRUS活检2 016个核,MRI-TRUS融合靶活检284个核。MRI-TRUS融合活检每芯检出率(51.76%,147/284)显著高于TRUS活检每芯检出率(19.64%,396/2 016)(χ2=142.38,P<0.05)。在PCa活检阳性的患者中,常规TRUS活检的活检芯为1 032芯,而MRI-TRUS活检的活检芯为214芯。可疑MRI-TRUS融合活检(68.69%,147/214)比TRUS活检(38.37%,396/1 032)检出更多的PCa (χ2=66.27, P<0.05)。在前列腺癌活检阳性患者中,MRI-TRUS融合活检[69.74%(106/152)]比TRUS活检[54.50%(351/644)]检出显著癌芯(χ2=11.67, P<0.05)。结论MRI-TRUS融合活检联合PI-RADS V2可显著提高前列腺癌的阳性率,提高临床显著性前列腺癌的检出率。关键词:前列腺肿瘤;磁共振成像;Transrectal超声波
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信