A road not taken? Economic ideology and the articulation of policy alternatives in Irish state economic policymaking, 1948–58

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
F. Fitzgerald
{"title":"A road not taken? Economic ideology and the articulation of policy alternatives in Irish state economic policymaking, 1948–58","authors":"F. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.2478/admin-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the midst of a seemingly unending economic crisis, the period 1948–58 saw a dramatic expansion of fiscal policy in Ireland. T. K. Whitaker’s Economic Development is traditionally represented as a landmark departure behind this change from traditional Department of Finance thinking and political inertia, propelled by the perceived Keynesian ideas of his fellow younger economists. However, by assessing the policy positions each actor adopted during major economic events of the period, this study argues that Whitaker’s economic outlook largely aligned with Finance’s, and that Economic Development must be viewed in large part as a reaction to the pre-existing fiscal commitments of the public capital programme. In tandem, it concludes that although the influential younger economists of the period are sometimes described as expansionist Keynesians – such as Patrick Lynch, who in the early part of the decade spearheaded Keynesian-type initiatives such as the capital budget principle – by mid decade their views aligned with the more classical economic outlook of the Department of Finance.","PeriodicalId":41890,"journal":{"name":"Administration","volume":"71 1","pages":"27 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the midst of a seemingly unending economic crisis, the period 1948–58 saw a dramatic expansion of fiscal policy in Ireland. T. K. Whitaker’s Economic Development is traditionally represented as a landmark departure behind this change from traditional Department of Finance thinking and political inertia, propelled by the perceived Keynesian ideas of his fellow younger economists. However, by assessing the policy positions each actor adopted during major economic events of the period, this study argues that Whitaker’s economic outlook largely aligned with Finance’s, and that Economic Development must be viewed in large part as a reaction to the pre-existing fiscal commitments of the public capital programme. In tandem, it concludes that although the influential younger economists of the period are sometimes described as expansionist Keynesians – such as Patrick Lynch, who in the early part of the decade spearheaded Keynesian-type initiatives such as the capital budget principle – by mid decade their views aligned with the more classical economic outlook of the Department of Finance.
一条没有走的路?经济意识形态和爱尔兰国家经济政策制定中政策选择的阐述,1948–58
摘要在一场看似无休止的经济危机中,1948–58年期间,爱尔兰的财政政策急剧扩张。传统上,T·K·惠特克的《经济发展》被认为是对财政部传统思维和政治惯性的一次里程碑式的转变,而这一转变是由他的年轻经济学家们所认为的凯恩斯主义思想推动的。然而,通过评估这一时期各行为体在重大经济事件中采取的政策立场,本研究认为,惠特克的经济前景与财政部的经济前景基本一致,经济发展必须在很大程度上被视为对公共资本计划预先存在的财政承诺的反应。同时,它得出的结论是,尽管这一时期有影响力的年轻经济学家有时被描述为扩张主义凯恩斯主义者——比如帕特里克·林奇,他在本世纪初率先提出了凯恩斯主义类型的倡议,如资本预算原则——但到了本世纪中期,他们的观点与财政部更经典的经济前景一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Administration
Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Administration is the peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Ireland. It has been published quarterly since 1953. As the principal journal concerned with Irish public administration and its development, it seeks to combine original scholarship on public administration from a variety of disciplines with the insights and experiences of practitioners. In addition to research articles, which are double blind peer reviewed, the journal welcomes comments on articles, opinion pieces, letters, notices, reports and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信