Caracterizando os itens de química do novo ENEM na perspectiva da alfabetização científica

R. Pereira, Leonardo Maciel Moreira
{"title":"Caracterizando os itens de química do novo ENEM na perspectiva da alfabetização científica","authors":"R. Pereira, Leonardo Maciel Moreira","doi":"10.1590/1516-731320180020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishThe objective of this research is to analyse to what extent the chemistry issues of National High School Examination (ENEM) during 2009-2015 evaluate the scientific literacy (SL). It dialogues with previous research to discuss the internal consistency of the exam and moves forward by listing a new aspect, SL. The method used is qualitative. A reference matrix and chemistry issues were treated by content analysis, with an assignment in theoretical categories. The results showed a divergence between the relevant skills and competences referring to SL and presents in a reference matrix the chemistry issues, respectively, 17.4% and 86.6% (category Terms, knowledge and fundamental scientific concepts), 65.2% and 13.4% (category Science, technology, society and environment) and 17.4% and 0% (category nature of science and ethical and political factors). In the end, it is recommended that the exam evaluate, significantly, all the SL’s proposals presented in reference matrix. portuguesO objetivo desta pesquisa e analisar em que medida os itens de quimica do Exame Nacional do Ensino Medio (ENEM) no periodo 2009-2015 avaliam a alfabetizacao cientifica (AC). Ela dialoga com pesquisas anteriores por discutir a coerencia interna do exame e avanca por elencar um novo aspecto, a AC. O metodo utilizado e qualitativo. A matriz de referencia e os itens de quimica foram tratados por analise de conteudo, com a atribuicao em categorias teoricas. Os dados revelaram divergencias entre as habilidades e competencias pertinentes a AC presentes na matriz de referencia e nos itens de quimica, respectivamente, 17,4% e 86,6% (categoria Termos, conhecimentos e conceitos cientificos fundamentais), 65,2% e 13,4% (categoria Ciencia, tecnologia, sociedade e meio ambiente) e 17,4% e 0% (categoria natureza da ciencia e dos fatores eticos e politicos). Ao final, recomenda-se que o exame avalie, de forma significativa, todas as proposicoes da AC presentes na matriz de referencia.","PeriodicalId":30004,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia Educacao","volume":"24 1","pages":"467-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1516-731320180020013","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia Educacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320180020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

EnglishThe objective of this research is to analyse to what extent the chemistry issues of National High School Examination (ENEM) during 2009-2015 evaluate the scientific literacy (SL). It dialogues with previous research to discuss the internal consistency of the exam and moves forward by listing a new aspect, SL. The method used is qualitative. A reference matrix and chemistry issues were treated by content analysis, with an assignment in theoretical categories. The results showed a divergence between the relevant skills and competences referring to SL and presents in a reference matrix the chemistry issues, respectively, 17.4% and 86.6% (category Terms, knowledge and fundamental scientific concepts), 65.2% and 13.4% (category Science, technology, society and environment) and 17.4% and 0% (category nature of science and ethical and political factors). In the end, it is recommended that the exam evaluate, significantly, all the SL’s proposals presented in reference matrix. portuguesO objetivo desta pesquisa e analisar em que medida os itens de quimica do Exame Nacional do Ensino Medio (ENEM) no periodo 2009-2015 avaliam a alfabetizacao cientifica (AC). Ela dialoga com pesquisas anteriores por discutir a coerencia interna do exame e avanca por elencar um novo aspecto, a AC. O metodo utilizado e qualitativo. A matriz de referencia e os itens de quimica foram tratados por analise de conteudo, com a atribuicao em categorias teoricas. Os dados revelaram divergencias entre as habilidades e competencias pertinentes a AC presentes na matriz de referencia e nos itens de quimica, respectivamente, 17,4% e 86,6% (categoria Termos, conhecimentos e conceitos cientificos fundamentais), 65,2% e 13,4% (categoria Ciencia, tecnologia, sociedade e meio ambiente) e 17,4% e 0% (categoria natureza da ciencia e dos fatores eticos e politicos). Ao final, recomenda-se que o exame avalie, de forma significativa, todas as proposicoes da AC presentes na matriz de referencia.
从科学素养的角度看新ENEM化学项目的特点
本研究的目的是分析2009-2015年国家高中考试(ENEM)的化学问题在多大程度上评价了科学素养(SL)。它与之前的研究对话,讨论了考试的内部一致性,并通过列出一个新的方面SL来推进。使用的方法是定性的。参考矩阵和化学问题通过内容分析处理,并在理论类别中分配任务。结果显示,与SL相关的技能和能力在参考矩阵中分别存在差异,分别为17.4%和86.6%(术语、知识和基本科学概念类别),65.2%和13.4%(科学、技术、社会和环境类别)和17.4%和0%(科学性质和伦理和政治因素类别)。最后,建议考试评估参考矩阵中列出的所有SL的建议。目的:对2009-2015年期间国家信息媒体考试(ENEM)项目的信息媒体进行分析。任何对话都是在讨论前进行的,必须在内部进行检查,并在新的方面进行检查,或使用定性的方法。一个参考矩阵是由若干项目组成的,这些项目可以用来分析它们的背景、特征和属性,以及它们的类别。这两个类别分别为17.4%和86.6%(术语类、信心类和科学基本概念类)、65.2%和13.4%(科学、技术、社会和环境类)、17.4%和0%(自然类、科学类和政治类)。最后,建议性的审查是否有效,是否有意义,今天作为建议的数据,AC提出了一个矩阵的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信