What’s behind a literacy war? A discursive and political analysis of the neoconservative Brazilian literacy policy

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
A. Duboc, D. Ferraz
{"title":"What’s behind a literacy war? A discursive and political analysis of the neoconservative Brazilian literacy policy","authors":"A. Duboc, D. Ferraz","doi":"10.1080/17447143.2020.1800714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims at addressing the intrinsic relationship between literacy and politics by presenting a discursive analysis of the new National Literacy Policy under the Brazilian far-right neoconservative government. In doing so, the text departs from a brief genealogical exercise in which the theorizations on literacies studies in Brazil and elsewhere are compared and contrasted, with emphasis to the evolving notions of critique and citizenship. Analysis has shown that the new Brazilian National Literacy Policy is part of an orchestrated set of actions in which neoliberal, religious, ideological and militaristic driving forces operate despite official claims of discursive neutrality. By advocating in favor of socially-just literacy pedagogies and by cherishing the notions of critique as ‘reading as we read ourselves’ and ‘active citizenship’, this paper calls for a reimagined self-critique along with a set of collective actions if literacy researchers and teachers wish to tackle the challenges and complexities surrounding literacy wars in neoconservative times.","PeriodicalId":45223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17447143.2020.1800714","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multicultural Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1800714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper aims at addressing the intrinsic relationship between literacy and politics by presenting a discursive analysis of the new National Literacy Policy under the Brazilian far-right neoconservative government. In doing so, the text departs from a brief genealogical exercise in which the theorizations on literacies studies in Brazil and elsewhere are compared and contrasted, with emphasis to the evolving notions of critique and citizenship. Analysis has shown that the new Brazilian National Literacy Policy is part of an orchestrated set of actions in which neoliberal, religious, ideological and militaristic driving forces operate despite official claims of discursive neutrality. By advocating in favor of socially-just literacy pedagogies and by cherishing the notions of critique as ‘reading as we read ourselves’ and ‘active citizenship’, this paper calls for a reimagined self-critique along with a set of collective actions if literacy researchers and teachers wish to tackle the challenges and complexities surrounding literacy wars in neoconservative times.
扫盲战争的背后是什么?新保守主义巴西扫盲政策的话语与政治分析
本文旨在通过对巴西极右翼新保守主义政府下的新国家扫盲政策进行话语分析,探讨扫盲与政治之间的内在关系。在这样做的过程中,文本偏离了一个简短的家谱练习,其中对巴西和其他地方的识字研究的理论进行了比较和对比,强调了批判和公民身份的发展概念。分析表明,新的巴西国家扫盲政策是一系列精心策划的行动的一部分,在这些行动中,新自由主义、宗教、意识形态和军国主义的驱动力在运作,尽管官方声称话语中立。通过倡导社会公正的扫盲教学法,通过珍视“阅读我们自己”和“积极公民”的批评概念,本文呼吁重新想象自我批评以及一系列集体行动,如果扫盲研究人员和教师希望解决新保守主义时代扫盲战争的挑战和复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信