Instrumental methods for assessing the state of the paravertebral lumbar muscles in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy and nonspecific muscle-skeletal pain

Q4 Medicine
E. Seliverstova, V. Voitenkov, V. Komantsev, M. Sinkin, A. Grin
{"title":"Instrumental methods for assessing the state of the paravertebral lumbar muscles in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy and nonspecific muscle-skeletal pain","authors":"E. Seliverstova, V. Voitenkov, V. Komantsev, M. Sinkin, A. Grin","doi":"10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-2-73-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neurological examination plays the main role in diagnostic and management of radiculopathies. In addition, the instrumental methods could be used for diagnosis of the morphological and functional state of paraspinal muscles. Paraspinal muscles are symmetrical back muscles surrounding the spinal column and supporting it. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as needle electromyography (EMG) and ultrasound are used for instrumental diagnosis of paraspinal muscles conditions. We provide the review on the current scope of studies on radiculopathies and non-specific back pain. MRI is the principle standard for radiculopathy diagnosis, but other methods such as muscle ultrasound and needle electromyography are also used here. MRI is characterized by a high cost, and it is impossible to carry it out if there are magnetic objects present in the patient’s body. EMG and ultrasound both are not sufficient enough to study the level of the fatty replacement of the paraspinal muscle, while this parameter is quite significant for measuring a radiculopathy outcome. Thus, we consider it rational to recommend using these methods in combination. Indications for the combined examination may be such complex cases as anatomical anomalies of spinal roots, atypical disease pattern.","PeriodicalId":36724,"journal":{"name":"Russian Neurological Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Neurological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-2-73-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Neurological examination plays the main role in diagnostic and management of radiculopathies. In addition, the instrumental methods could be used for diagnosis of the morphological and functional state of paraspinal muscles. Paraspinal muscles are symmetrical back muscles surrounding the spinal column and supporting it. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as needle electromyography (EMG) and ultrasound are used for instrumental diagnosis of paraspinal muscles conditions. We provide the review on the current scope of studies on radiculopathies and non-specific back pain. MRI is the principle standard for radiculopathy diagnosis, but other methods such as muscle ultrasound and needle electromyography are also used here. MRI is characterized by a high cost, and it is impossible to carry it out if there are magnetic objects present in the patient’s body. EMG and ultrasound both are not sufficient enough to study the level of the fatty replacement of the paraspinal muscle, while this parameter is quite significant for measuring a radiculopathy outcome. Thus, we consider it rational to recommend using these methods in combination. Indications for the combined examination may be such complex cases as anatomical anomalies of spinal roots, atypical disease pattern.
评估腰骶神经根病和非特异性肌肉-骨骼疼痛患者椎旁腰肌状态的仪器方法
神经学检查在神经根病的诊断和治疗中起着主要作用。此外,仪器方法可用于诊断棘旁肌的形态和功能状态。棘旁肌是对称的背部肌肉,围绕并支撑脊柱。磁共振成像(MRI)以及针肌电图(EMG)和超声被用于棘旁肌肉状况的仪器诊断。我们就神经根病和非特异性背痛的研究现状进行综述。MRI是神经根病诊断的主要标准,但也使用其他方法,如肌肉超声和针肌电图。MRI的特点是成本高,如果患者体内有磁性物体,则无法进行。肌电图和超声都不足以研究棘旁肌脂肪替代的水平,而该参数对神经根病的预后有相当重要的意义。因此,我们认为建议将这些方法结合使用是合理的。联合检查的适应症可以是复杂的病例,如脊柱根解剖异常,不典型的疾病类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Neurological Journal
Russian Neurological Journal Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信