{"title":"Preparing for the Worst or Hoping for the Best? The State of Fall Training in Prosthesis Users","authors":"C. Noble, G. Fiedler","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction The risk of accidental falls is greater in people with lower-limb loss than in their able-bodied peers. Most popular strategies to mitigate injuries from such falls include technical solutions that prevent falls or protect vulnerable body segments from destructive forces. Fall training is another effective intervention, but little evidence on its use in prosthesis users has been published. This research had the goal to investigate to what extent fall training is provided to the target population and what factors may be obstacles to its wider adoption. Methods An online questionnaire was developed and administered nationwide, targeting people with lower-limb loss. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the availability of fall training, and a logistic regression was performed to investigate variables that predict whether an individual receives fall training or not. Results A total of 180 responses was recorded, 166 of which were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds of respondents had not received fall training. Those who had physical therapy as part of their rehabilitation regimen were 3.7 times more likely to also have had fall training. Discussion Our data suggest that the potential benefits of providing fall training to people with lower-limb loss are not being fully realized. Interdisciplinary collaboration between prosthetists and therapists can help expand access to fall training interventions to better prepare patients for the likely event of an accidental fall.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"135 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction The risk of accidental falls is greater in people with lower-limb loss than in their able-bodied peers. Most popular strategies to mitigate injuries from such falls include technical solutions that prevent falls or protect vulnerable body segments from destructive forces. Fall training is another effective intervention, but little evidence on its use in prosthesis users has been published. This research had the goal to investigate to what extent fall training is provided to the target population and what factors may be obstacles to its wider adoption. Methods An online questionnaire was developed and administered nationwide, targeting people with lower-limb loss. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the availability of fall training, and a logistic regression was performed to investigate variables that predict whether an individual receives fall training or not. Results A total of 180 responses was recorded, 166 of which were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds of respondents had not received fall training. Those who had physical therapy as part of their rehabilitation regimen were 3.7 times more likely to also have had fall training. Discussion Our data suggest that the potential benefits of providing fall training to people with lower-limb loss are not being fully realized. Interdisciplinary collaboration between prosthetists and therapists can help expand access to fall training interventions to better prepare patients for the likely event of an accidental fall.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.