{"title":"The Idea of Unity and Catholicity of the Church in the Custom of Mentioning the Bishop’s Name in the Eucharistic Prayer","authors":"A. Żądło","doi":"10.21697/ct.2022.92.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The editio tertia emendata of the Paul VI Missal was made available to the Church in 2008. Particularly noteworthy among the many emendationes of this edition is the one that refers to the situation when the bishop celebrates the Holy Mass outside his own diocese. In the Missal published in 2002, it was suggested that this mention should be as follows: et me indigno famulo tuo, et fratre meo N., Episcopo huius Ecclesiae N. In the revised edition it is proposed that the “guest” bishop should mention his brother first (et fratre meo N.), who for him is the bishop of the diocese where he celebrates Mass, and only later mention himself (et me indigno famulo tuo). In doing so, he should also not additionally define the local Church as “N.,” i.e., for example, Varsovian or Washingtonian, which, as such, do not exist, but he should pray for the bishop of “this Church” (huius Ecclesiae), within which he celebrates the liturgy in communion with the universal Church, emphasized by fraternal unity with the local pastor. The article shows that this modification is of great theological significance and corresponds to the ecclesiology of Vatican II.","PeriodicalId":38491,"journal":{"name":"Collectanea Theologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collectanea Theologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2022.92.2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The editio tertia emendata of the Paul VI Missal was made available to the Church in 2008. Particularly noteworthy among the many emendationes of this edition is the one that refers to the situation when the bishop celebrates the Holy Mass outside his own diocese. In the Missal published in 2002, it was suggested that this mention should be as follows: et me indigno famulo tuo, et fratre meo N., Episcopo huius Ecclesiae N. In the revised edition it is proposed that the “guest” bishop should mention his brother first (et fratre meo N.), who for him is the bishop of the diocese where he celebrates Mass, and only later mention himself (et me indigno famulo tuo). In doing so, he should also not additionally define the local Church as “N.,” i.e., for example, Varsovian or Washingtonian, which, as such, do not exist, but he should pray for the bishop of “this Church” (huius Ecclesiae), within which he celebrates the liturgy in communion with the universal Church, emphasized by fraternal unity with the local pastor. The article shows that this modification is of great theological significance and corresponds to the ecclesiology of Vatican II.
《保禄六世弥撒经书》的修订版本于2008年提供给教会。特别值得注意的是,在这个版本的许多修订中,有一个提到了主教在自己的教区外庆祝弥撒的情况。在2002年出版的《弥撒经》中,有人建议这样提到:et me indigno famulo two, et fratre meo N., Episcopo huius Ecclesiae N.在修订版中,建议“客人”主教应该首先提到他的兄弟(et fratre meo N.),他是他举行弥撒的教区的主教,然后才提到他自己(et me indigno famulo two)。在这样做的时候,他也不应该额外地将当地教会定义为“N”。例如,瓦尔索夫教或华盛顿教,但他应该为“这个教会”(huius Ecclesiae)的主教祈祷,在这个教会中,他庆祝与普世教会共融的礼仪,强调与当地牧师的兄弟般的团结。文章表明,这一修改是具有重大的神学意义,并符合梵蒂冈第二次教会。
期刊介绍:
The main objective of the Collectanea Theologica journal is to present the current state of theology in Poland and its place in the world theology. The journal covers a rich spectrum of theological problems, ranging from biblical issues to the current pastoral and liturgical challenges. The quarterly goes to all theological libraries in Poland and some significant foreign libraries. According to the profile of the journal, the basic language of publication in the journal is Polish.