Efcacy of Electrostimulation and Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: Randomised Controlled Trial

Q4 Medicine
Vaiva Nepaitė-Stabingė, Anelė Katinė, Erika Karkauskiene, V. Dudonienė
{"title":"Efcacy of Electrostimulation and Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Vaiva Nepaitė-Stabingė, Anelė Katinė, Erika Karkauskiene, V. Dudonienė","doi":"10.33607/rmske.v1i28.1361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the most commonly used physiotherapy method in the treatment of female stress incontinence; pelvic floor muscles (PFM) can be trained not only with exercise but also with electrostimulation.\nThe aim. To determine the efcacy of four weeks of pelvic floor muscle exercises and electrical stimulation in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.\nMethods. The study involved 24 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups: pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and pelvic floor muscle exercises combined with electrostimulation (PFMES). Before and after the interventions, women’s quality of life (QoL) was assessed according to the International Incontinence Counselling Questionnaire – Short Form. Perineometry with Pelvexiser perineometer was used to measure pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance and vaginal resting pressure.\nResults. Both interventions signifcantly reduced urinary incontinence episodes and improved the subjects’ quality of life. PFM strength improved after the interventions in the PFMT group from 12.33±3.37 to 19.97±3.38 mmHg (p=0.0008, d=2.26) and in the PFMES group from 8.31±2.41 to 11.84 ±2.78 mmHg (p=0.003, d=2.6). PFM endurance improved in the PFMT group from 3.50±1.15 to 4.53±1.12 s (p=0.03, d=0.9), and in PFMES from 2.92±0.47 to 3.67±0, 52 s (p=0.001, d=1.45). Resting vaginal pressure in the PFMT group improved from 5.3±0.85 to 6.44±1.03 mmHg (p=0.005, d=1.25) and in the PFMES group from 4.4±0.70 to 6.14± 1.47 mmHg (p=0.001, d=1.5).\nConclusions. PFMT and PFMES interventions signifcantly improved subjects’ PMF strength, endurance, resting vaginal pressure, and quality of life. Both applied interventions can be applied in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, as they were safe and well tolerated by the patients. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifer: NCT05871281.\nKeywords: female, strength, endurance, incontinence, questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":34737,"journal":{"name":"Reabilitacijos Mokslai Slauga Kineziterapija Ergoterapija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reabilitacijos Mokslai Slauga Kineziterapija Ergoterapija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33607/rmske.v1i28.1361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the most commonly used physiotherapy method in the treatment of female stress incontinence; pelvic floor muscles (PFM) can be trained not only with exercise but also with electrostimulation. The aim. To determine the efcacy of four weeks of pelvic floor muscle exercises and electrical stimulation in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Methods. The study involved 24 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups: pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and pelvic floor muscle exercises combined with electrostimulation (PFMES). Before and after the interventions, women’s quality of life (QoL) was assessed according to the International Incontinence Counselling Questionnaire – Short Form. Perineometry with Pelvexiser perineometer was used to measure pelvic floor muscle strength, endurance and vaginal resting pressure. Results. Both interventions signifcantly reduced urinary incontinence episodes and improved the subjects’ quality of life. PFM strength improved after the interventions in the PFMT group from 12.33±3.37 to 19.97±3.38 mmHg (p=0.0008, d=2.26) and in the PFMES group from 8.31±2.41 to 11.84 ±2.78 mmHg (p=0.003, d=2.6). PFM endurance improved in the PFMT group from 3.50±1.15 to 4.53±1.12 s (p=0.03, d=0.9), and in PFMES from 2.92±0.47 to 3.67±0, 52 s (p=0.001, d=1.45). Resting vaginal pressure in the PFMT group improved from 5.3±0.85 to 6.44±1.03 mmHg (p=0.005, d=1.25) and in the PFMES group from 4.4±0.70 to 6.14± 1.47 mmHg (p=0.001, d=1.5). Conclusions. PFMT and PFMES interventions signifcantly improved subjects’ PMF strength, endurance, resting vaginal pressure, and quality of life. Both applied interventions can be applied in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, as they were safe and well tolerated by the patients. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifer: NCT05871281. Keywords: female, strength, endurance, incontinence, questionnaire.
电刺激和盆底肌锻炼治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效:随机对照试验
背景。盆底肌训练(PFMT)是治疗女性压力性尿失禁最常用的物理治疗方法;盆底肌(PFM)不仅可以通过运动训练,还可以通过电刺激训练。的目标。目的:探讨盆底肌运动加电刺激治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效。该研究涉及24名受试者,他们随机分为两组:盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)和盆底肌肉运动结合电刺激(PFMES)。在干预前后,根据国际尿失禁咨询问卷-简表评估妇女的生活质量。用Pelvexiser围膜计测量骨盆底肌肉力量、耐力和阴道静息压力。两种干预措施都显著减少了尿失禁发作,提高了受试者的生活质量。干预后,PFMT组PFM强度从12.33±3.37 mmHg提高到19.97±3.38 mmHg (p=0.0008, d=2.26), PFMES组从8.31±2.41 mmHg提高到11.84±2.78 mmHg (p=0.003, d=2.6)。PFMT组PFM耐力从3.50±1.15 s提高到4.53±1.12 s (p=0.03, d=0.9), PFMES组从2.92±0.47 s提高到3.67±0.52 s (p=0.001, d=1.45)。PFMT组静息阴道压由5.3±0.85改善至6.44±1.03 mmHg (p=0.005, d=1.25), PFMES组由4.4±0.70改善至6.14±1.47 mmHg (p=0.001, d=1.5)。PFMT和PFMES干预显著改善了受试者的PMF强度、耐力、静息阴道压力和生活质量。这两种干预措施均可应用于压力性尿失禁的治疗,因为它们安全且患者耐受性良好。该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,识别码:NCT05871281。关键词:女性,力量,耐力,尿失禁,问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信