Our Liaison Shall Remain Imperfect and Complicated

D. Loi
{"title":"Our Liaison Shall Remain Imperfect and Complicated","authors":"D. Loi","doi":"10.1145/3608377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a female voice (Scarlett Johansson). Not dissimilar from these fictional stories, a number of similar ones exist in real life. In Brisbane, Australia, for instance, Geoff Gallagher reported on his relationship with companion robot Emma, his robot wife that he’s hoping to marry [1]. Zheng Jiajia, an AI engineer in Hangzhou, China, married a robot he built himself after failing to find a human spouse [2]. The most intriguing example may be that of Davecat from Detroit, Michigan, who lives with his synthetic wife as well as his synthetic mistress [3]. David Levy [4] argues that nonhuman companions will play increasingly prominent roles in society as sexual technologies become increasingly sophisticated and society’s concept of what normal sex means changes. That said, there are many real-life and fictional examples of people debating, questioning, and focusing on permutations of human-to-nonhuman relationships that go beyond mere sexual transactions to deep, everyday companionship. From that standpoint, academic as well as commercial literature often looks at these new relationships from the perspective of what the machine is, may, should, or will be capable of feeling. Users of OpenAI’s DALL-E 2, for example, have shown the system’s ability to recognize and replicate patterns typically associated with the many abstract emotions that we humans feel for art created by other humans [5]. The system is not capable of feeling or experiencing an emotion per se—only of representing it. More specifically, it seems to understand how to pair a specific human emotion (e.g., love, sadness, or hope) with the correct facial expression, symbolism, and even color scheme that a human would associate with that emotion. Digging into this complex rabbit hole at a time when generative AI (GenAI) is revolutionizing discourse and society in all directions, I found myself asking a somewhat odd question: If generative AI were a person, what relationship would, could, and should I have with it? It appears that we humans are currently establishing a multitude of diverse relationships with GenAI. A look at social media suggests that many are in the midst of a fun relationship, with subconscious fears that such a relationship may become abusive and daydreaming that it may instead become true love. Some appear to be in the midst of an emotional affair—slowly but surely falling for the seemingly miraculous GenAI, so much so that they might soon consider jeopardizing other relationships to pursue their newfound lover. Others are possibly having a fling—they are in love yet keeping things loose and in the now, with no future plans and a number of doubts about the future, because the relationship, after all, makes them feel good yet may not last forever. For yet others, it’s complicated, maybe a love-hate or an onoff relationship. Then, of course, some are already in a codependent partnership or believe that they hold the power in a controlling relationship. And finally, it appears that many Silicon Valley tech bros are enjoying what can only be described as a trophy relationship— rather shallow, and possibly long lasting You have to know the past to understand the present. — Carl Sagan","PeriodicalId":73404,"journal":{"name":"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"30 1","pages":"20 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3608377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

a female voice (Scarlett Johansson). Not dissimilar from these fictional stories, a number of similar ones exist in real life. In Brisbane, Australia, for instance, Geoff Gallagher reported on his relationship with companion robot Emma, his robot wife that he’s hoping to marry [1]. Zheng Jiajia, an AI engineer in Hangzhou, China, married a robot he built himself after failing to find a human spouse [2]. The most intriguing example may be that of Davecat from Detroit, Michigan, who lives with his synthetic wife as well as his synthetic mistress [3]. David Levy [4] argues that nonhuman companions will play increasingly prominent roles in society as sexual technologies become increasingly sophisticated and society’s concept of what normal sex means changes. That said, there are many real-life and fictional examples of people debating, questioning, and focusing on permutations of human-to-nonhuman relationships that go beyond mere sexual transactions to deep, everyday companionship. From that standpoint, academic as well as commercial literature often looks at these new relationships from the perspective of what the machine is, may, should, or will be capable of feeling. Users of OpenAI’s DALL-E 2, for example, have shown the system’s ability to recognize and replicate patterns typically associated with the many abstract emotions that we humans feel for art created by other humans [5]. The system is not capable of feeling or experiencing an emotion per se—only of representing it. More specifically, it seems to understand how to pair a specific human emotion (e.g., love, sadness, or hope) with the correct facial expression, symbolism, and even color scheme that a human would associate with that emotion. Digging into this complex rabbit hole at a time when generative AI (GenAI) is revolutionizing discourse and society in all directions, I found myself asking a somewhat odd question: If generative AI were a person, what relationship would, could, and should I have with it? It appears that we humans are currently establishing a multitude of diverse relationships with GenAI. A look at social media suggests that many are in the midst of a fun relationship, with subconscious fears that such a relationship may become abusive and daydreaming that it may instead become true love. Some appear to be in the midst of an emotional affair—slowly but surely falling for the seemingly miraculous GenAI, so much so that they might soon consider jeopardizing other relationships to pursue their newfound lover. Others are possibly having a fling—they are in love yet keeping things loose and in the now, with no future plans and a number of doubts about the future, because the relationship, after all, makes them feel good yet may not last forever. For yet others, it’s complicated, maybe a love-hate or an onoff relationship. Then, of course, some are already in a codependent partnership or believe that they hold the power in a controlling relationship. And finally, it appears that many Silicon Valley tech bros are enjoying what can only be described as a trophy relationship— rather shallow, and possibly long lasting You have to know the past to understand the present. — Carl Sagan
我们的联络仍将是不完善和复杂的
女声(斯嘉丽·约翰逊)。与这些虚构的故事没有什么不同,现实生活中也存在许多类似的故事。例如,在澳大利亚布里斯班,Geoff Gallagher报道了他与机器人伴侣Emma的关系,Emma是他的机器人妻子,他希望与之结婚[1]。中国杭州的人工智能工程师郑佳佳在找不到人类配偶后,嫁给了他自己建造的机器人[2]。最有趣的例子可能是来自密歇根州底特律的Davecat,他和他的合成妻子以及合成情妇住在一起[3]。David Levy[4]认为,随着性技术的日益成熟和社会对正常性意味着什么的概念的改变,非人类伴侣将在社会中扮演越来越重要的角色。也就是说,有许多现实生活和虚构的例子表明,人们在辩论、质疑和关注人与人之间的关系,这些关系不仅仅是性交易,而是深入的日常友谊。从这个角度来看,学术和商业文学通常从机器是什么、可能是什么、应该是什么或将能够感受到什么的角度来看待这些新的关系。例如,OpenAI的DALL-E 2的用户已经展示了该系统识别和复制模式的能力,这些模式通常与我们人类对其他人创作的艺术所感受到的许多抽象情绪有关[5]。这个系统本身无法感受或体验一种情绪,只能表现它。更具体地说,它似乎了解如何将特定的人类情绪(如爱、悲伤或希望)与人类与该情绪相关联的正确面部表情、象征甚至配色方案相结合。在生成性人工智能(GenAI)正在全方位革命性地改变话语和社会的时候,我深入研究这个复杂的兔子洞,发现自己在问一个有点奇怪的问题:如果生成性AI是一个人,我会、可能、应该和它有什么关系?看来,我们人类目前正在与GenAI建立多种多样的关系。查看社交媒体可以发现,许多人正处于一段有趣的关系中,潜意识里担心这种关系可能会变得虐待,并幻想它可能会变成真爱。有些人似乎正处于一段感情纠葛中——慢慢但肯定地爱上了看似奇迹般的GenAI,以至于他们可能很快就会考虑破坏其他关系来追求他们的新情人。其他人可能有过一段风流韵事——他们恋爱了,但保持着松散的关系,现在没有未来的计划,对未来有很多怀疑,因为这段关系毕竟让他们感觉良好,但可能不会永远持续下去。对其他人来说,这很复杂,可能是爱恨交织,也可能是断断续续的关系。当然,有些人已经处于相互依赖的伙伴关系中,或者认为他们在控制关系中掌握着权力。最后,似乎许多硅谷的科技兄弟都在享受一种只能被描述为战利品的关系——相当肤浅,可能会持续很长时间。你必须了解过去才能理解现在。——卡尔·萨根
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信