Percezione del rischio e adozione di misure di protezione: un'indagine esplorativa al tempo del primo lockdown da Covid-19 in Italia

Q4 Medicine
L. Lombi, M. Terraneo
{"title":"Percezione del rischio e adozione di misure di protezione: un'indagine esplorativa al tempo del primo lockdown da Covid-19 in Italia","authors":"L. Lombi, M. Terraneo","doi":"10.3280/ses2022-003011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the results of a study that collected information on a sample of 2,183 individuals through a web survey, conducted in Italy during the period of the first lockdown linked to COVID-19 and aimed at exploring the theme of risk perception at the time of the pandemic. Specifically, the paper will examine two aspects: (a) the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents about risk;(b) the relationship between risk perception and the likelihood of adopting behaviours aimed at averting contagion. As regards the first point, the results show that those with a lower perception of risk are males, older, unmarried. The level of education only affects the fear of not surviving in the event of contagion (those with higher qualifications are less afraid). Concerning the second aspect, data show that those who perceive a greater risk tend to adopt individual protection measures with greater probability. The results of the study are useful for providing suggestions to improve the risk communication, that is a priority for public health agendas, and suggest to target it according to the specific profiles of the individuals to whom it is addressed. Copyright © FrancoAngeli.","PeriodicalId":52081,"journal":{"name":"Salute e Societa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salute e Societa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/ses2022-003011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the results of a study that collected information on a sample of 2,183 individuals through a web survey, conducted in Italy during the period of the first lockdown linked to COVID-19 and aimed at exploring the theme of risk perception at the time of the pandemic. Specifically, the paper will examine two aspects: (a) the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents about risk;(b) the relationship between risk perception and the likelihood of adopting behaviours aimed at averting contagion. As regards the first point, the results show that those with a lower perception of risk are males, older, unmarried. The level of education only affects the fear of not surviving in the event of contagion (those with higher qualifications are less afraid). Concerning the second aspect, data show that those who perceive a greater risk tend to adopt individual protection measures with greater probability. The results of the study are useful for providing suggestions to improve the risk communication, that is a priority for public health agendas, and suggest to target it according to the specific profiles of the individuals to whom it is addressed. Copyright © FrancoAngeli.
风险感知和采取保护措施:意大利首次新冠肺炎封锁时的探索性调查
本文讨论了一项研究的结果,该研究通过一项网络调查收集了2183人的样本信息,该调查是在意大利与新冠肺炎相关的第一次封锁期间进行的,旨在探索大流行时的风险感知主题。具体而言,本文将考察两个方面:(a)受访者关于风险的社会人口学特征;(b) 风险感知与采取旨在避免传染的行为的可能性之间的关系。关于第一点,研究结果表明,对风险感知较低的是男性,年龄较大,未婚。教育水平只会影响在传染病发生时无法生存的恐惧(那些学历较高的人不那么害怕)。关于第二个方面,数据显示,那些认为风险更大的人往往采取个人保护措施的可能性更大。该研究的结果有助于提供建议,以改善风险沟通,这是公共卫生议程的优先事项,并建议根据所针对的个人的具体情况来针对风险沟通。版权所有©FrancoAngeli。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Salute e Societa
Salute e Societa Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信