Valeriu David, V. Petrovici, L. Saptefrati, V. Fulga, Ecaterina Carpenco, Elena Frant
{"title":"Evaluation of p57 expression in early disordered pregnancies with molar status vs non-molar ones","authors":"Valeriu David, V. Petrovici, L. Saptefrati, V. Fulga, Ecaterina Carpenco, Elena Frant","doi":"10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-2.22.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The molar and non-molar lesions are determined during histomorphological examination and treated as inconclusive. The establishing of a marker by immunohistochemical investigations could influence the accuracy of the morphopathological diagnosis. The aim is evaluation of p57 immunoexpression in the trophoblastic germ compartment in molar and non-molar pregnancies. Material and methods: Abortion products from 15 patients with hydatidiform mole, 18 pregnancies solved on social indications and 16 short-term disordered pregnancies were evaluated depending on the immunoexpresion of p57. Results: The hydatidiform mole was classified based on anti-p57 immunoexpression into: complete hydatidiform mole – 8 cases (negative immunoexpression or expression in ˂10% of villous cytotrophoblast) and partial hydatidiform mole – 7 cases (positive expression in ˃10% of the villous cytotrophoblast). Basal deciduous and extravillous cytotrophoblasts were positive in 100% of cases and served as internal control. Hepatocytes were used as negative control. In the control group, the positive immunoexpression was attested in >10% of cases in the villous trophoblast. Conclusions: Differential immunoexpression of p57 protein in the germinal cytotrophoblast allows subclassification of molar pathology into complete and partial forms, while not allowing the differentiation between partial hydatidiform mole and non-molar lesions. Immunohistochemical evaluation of p57kip2 protein in molar and non-molar pathology is useful in differential diagnosis as a complementary method.","PeriodicalId":32733,"journal":{"name":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.65-2.22.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The molar and non-molar lesions are determined during histomorphological examination and treated as inconclusive. The establishing of a marker by immunohistochemical investigations could influence the accuracy of the morphopathological diagnosis. The aim is evaluation of p57 immunoexpression in the trophoblastic germ compartment in molar and non-molar pregnancies. Material and methods: Abortion products from 15 patients with hydatidiform mole, 18 pregnancies solved on social indications and 16 short-term disordered pregnancies were evaluated depending on the immunoexpresion of p57. Results: The hydatidiform mole was classified based on anti-p57 immunoexpression into: complete hydatidiform mole – 8 cases (negative immunoexpression or expression in ˂10% of villous cytotrophoblast) and partial hydatidiform mole – 7 cases (positive expression in ˃10% of the villous cytotrophoblast). Basal deciduous and extravillous cytotrophoblasts were positive in 100% of cases and served as internal control. Hepatocytes were used as negative control. In the control group, the positive immunoexpression was attested in >10% of cases in the villous trophoblast. Conclusions: Differential immunoexpression of p57 protein in the germinal cytotrophoblast allows subclassification of molar pathology into complete and partial forms, while not allowing the differentiation between partial hydatidiform mole and non-molar lesions. Immunohistochemical evaluation of p57kip2 protein in molar and non-molar pathology is useful in differential diagnosis as a complementary method.