História do Direito e História da Sociedade: Questões de Método e Problemas de Pesquisa

Mario Sbriccoli
{"title":"História do Direito e História da Sociedade: Questões de Método e Problemas de Pesquisa","authors":"Mario Sbriccoli","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a conference held in April 1985 in the context of the discussions on relationships between history and social sciences promoted by the so-called Annales school. How can we build bridges between legal history and history of society in terms of research methods and problems? Understanding law as the juridical dimension of social phenomena, Sbriccoli argues that law cannot be subsidiary in certain research on social practices and that legal historians cannot isolate themselves, they should desdisciplinarize themselves, while maintaining the autonomy of the area, in order to dialogue with history of society, so that an effective exchange can take place. In short, “it is necessary to become bilingual to live and operate in a world that is structurally bilingual”.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"41 1","pages":"288-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a conference held in April 1985 in the context of the discussions on relationships between history and social sciences promoted by the so-called Annales school. How can we build bridges between legal history and history of society in terms of research methods and problems? Understanding law as the juridical dimension of social phenomena, Sbriccoli argues that law cannot be subsidiary in certain research on social practices and that legal historians cannot isolate themselves, they should desdisciplinarize themselves, while maintaining the autonomy of the area, in order to dialogue with history of society, so that an effective exchange can take place. In short, “it is necessary to become bilingual to live and operate in a world that is structurally bilingual”.
法律史与社会史:方法问题与研究问题
这是1985年4月在所谓的年鉴学派推动的关于历史和社会科学之间关系的讨论背景下举行的一次会议。我们如何在法律史和社会史之间架起研究方法和问题的桥梁?Sbricoli将法律理解为社会现象的司法维度,他认为法律不能辅助于对社会实践的某些研究,法律历史学家不能孤立自己,他们应该在保持该地区自治的同时去约束自己,以便与社会历史对话,从而进行有效的交流。简言之,“要在一个结构上是双语的世界里生活和运作,就必须成为双语者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信