{"title":"Validation of Sherlock, a linear trajectory analysis program for use in bloodstain pattern analysis","authors":"Amanda Orr, M. Illes, J. Béland, T. Stotesbury","doi":"10.1080/00085030.2019.1577793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research validates the accuracy and efficacy of Sherlock, a recently developed program that estimates the area of origin (AO) of an impact pattern. Sherlock is an open-access, web-based software that conducts trajectory analysis by using the tangent method to estimate the area of origin. Fifty impact patterns were created at known X-, Y-, and Z-coordinates and were analyzed by upper year forensic science undergraduate students at Trent University. Individual stain data collected for each pattern were analyzed by both Sherlock and BackTrackTM/WIN. In this validation, we assess two objectives. The first evaluates the overall accuracy of the Sherlock program and the second compares the AO results between Sherlock and BackTrackTM/WIN when analyzing the same stain data. The average absolute deviation from the known using Sherlock was found to be 5.6 cm for the X-coordinate, 2.3 cm for the Y-coordinate, and 6.6 cm for the Z-coordinate. Further, when comparing the three-dimensional (3D) coordinate vector values, which considers all three coordinates as a single value, the Sherlock and known 3D AOs were shown to be similar with an average absolute deviation of 3.5 cm. Comparison between BackTrackTM/WIN and Sherlock provided statistically similar results for all comparisons (p > 0.05 in all cases), with average absolute deviations of 0.28 cm, 0.13 cm, and 0.75 cm in the X-, Y-, and Z-coordinates, respectively. This research demonstrates that the accuracy of the Sherlock program is comparable to a previously validated AO analysis program with similar absolute deviation from the true AO for single surface impact patterns.","PeriodicalId":44383,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"78 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00085030.2019.1577793","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.2019.1577793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Abstract This research validates the accuracy and efficacy of Sherlock, a recently developed program that estimates the area of origin (AO) of an impact pattern. Sherlock is an open-access, web-based software that conducts trajectory analysis by using the tangent method to estimate the area of origin. Fifty impact patterns were created at known X-, Y-, and Z-coordinates and were analyzed by upper year forensic science undergraduate students at Trent University. Individual stain data collected for each pattern were analyzed by both Sherlock and BackTrackTM/WIN. In this validation, we assess two objectives. The first evaluates the overall accuracy of the Sherlock program and the second compares the AO results between Sherlock and BackTrackTM/WIN when analyzing the same stain data. The average absolute deviation from the known using Sherlock was found to be 5.6 cm for the X-coordinate, 2.3 cm for the Y-coordinate, and 6.6 cm for the Z-coordinate. Further, when comparing the three-dimensional (3D) coordinate vector values, which considers all three coordinates as a single value, the Sherlock and known 3D AOs were shown to be similar with an average absolute deviation of 3.5 cm. Comparison between BackTrackTM/WIN and Sherlock provided statistically similar results for all comparisons (p > 0.05 in all cases), with average absolute deviations of 0.28 cm, 0.13 cm, and 0.75 cm in the X-, Y-, and Z-coordinates, respectively. This research demonstrates that the accuracy of the Sherlock program is comparable to a previously validated AO analysis program with similar absolute deviation from the true AO for single surface impact patterns.