Examining the Perception and Effectiveness of a System Awareness Briefing During Cruise Flight

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Winter, Mattie N. Milner, Emily C. Anania, S. Rice, Nathan W. Walters, Diego M. Garcia, Bradley S. Baugh
{"title":"Examining the Perception and Effectiveness of a System Awareness Briefing During Cruise Flight","authors":"S. Winter, Mattie N. Milner, Emily C. Anania, S. Rice, Nathan W. Walters, Diego M. Garcia, Bradley S. Baugh","doi":"10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automation has increased the safety of air transportation by assisting pilots during periods of high workload and during critical phases of flight. However, an unintended consequence of automation proliferation has been the reduction in attention resulting from its use. Prior research has shown that during periods of high automation and low workload, pilots’ minds begin to wander and occupy themselves with thoughts other than the current task at hand. This research involved conducting four separate studies addressing the following research questions: 1) Would the use of a system awareness briefing result in the general public being more willing to fly on commercial airlines? 2) Do student pilots support the use of a system awareness briefing? and 3) Does a system awareness briefing actually improve pilot awareness of automation and aircraft parameters during cruise flight? The results from Studies 1 and 2 indicated participants preferred flying with a pilot who was using the system awareness briefing compared to a pilot not using the briefing. The findings from Study 3 did not reveal any significant differences between pilots who used the system awareness briefing versus those that did not. In Study 4, pilots who used the system awareness briefing were more accurate in reporting current heading, fuel flow, and electrical volts, compared to pilots who did not use the briefing. They also reported that they felt more situational awareness compared to the control group. Keywords: system awareness briefing; experimental research; automation; training","PeriodicalId":39089,"journal":{"name":"Collegiate Aviation Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegiate Aviation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22488/OKSTATE.19.100201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Automation has increased the safety of air transportation by assisting pilots during periods of high workload and during critical phases of flight. However, an unintended consequence of automation proliferation has been the reduction in attention resulting from its use. Prior research has shown that during periods of high automation and low workload, pilots’ minds begin to wander and occupy themselves with thoughts other than the current task at hand. This research involved conducting four separate studies addressing the following research questions: 1) Would the use of a system awareness briefing result in the general public being more willing to fly on commercial airlines? 2) Do student pilots support the use of a system awareness briefing? and 3) Does a system awareness briefing actually improve pilot awareness of automation and aircraft parameters during cruise flight? The results from Studies 1 and 2 indicated participants preferred flying with a pilot who was using the system awareness briefing compared to a pilot not using the briefing. The findings from Study 3 did not reveal any significant differences between pilots who used the system awareness briefing versus those that did not. In Study 4, pilots who used the system awareness briefing were more accurate in reporting current heading, fuel flow, and electrical volts, compared to pilots who did not use the briefing. They also reported that they felt more situational awareness compared to the control group. Keywords: system awareness briefing; experimental research; automation; training
考察巡航飞行过程中系统意识简报的感知和有效性
自动化通过在高工作量时期和飞行的关键阶段协助飞行员,提高了航空运输的安全性。然而,自动化激增的一个意想不到的后果是,由于使用自动化,人们的注意力减少了。先前的研究表明,在高度自动化和低工作量的时期,飞行员的大脑开始漫游,并沉浸在手头任务之外的想法中。这项研究涉及进行四项单独的研究,解决以下研究问题:1)使用系统意识简报会让公众更愿意乘坐商业航空公司的航班吗?2) 学生飞行员是否支持使用系统意识简报?以及3)系统意识简报是否真的提高了飞行员对巡航飞行过程中的自动化和飞机参数的意识?研究1和2的结果表明,与不使用系统意识简报的飞行员相比,参与者更喜欢与使用系统意识简介的飞行员一起飞行。研究3的结果没有显示使用系统意识简报的飞行员与不使用系统意识简介的飞行员之间有任何显著差异。在研究4中,与不使用系统意识简报的飞行员相比,使用系统意识简介的飞行员在报告当前航向、燃料流量和电压方面更准确。他们还报告说,与对照组相比,他们感觉到了更多的情境意识。关键词:系统意识简报;实验研究;自动化训练
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegiate Aviation Review
Collegiate Aviation Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信