Neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer—established treatments and new developments reviewed

B. Mostert, A. Gaast
{"title":"Neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer—established treatments and new developments reviewed","authors":"B. Mostert, A. Gaast","doi":"10.21037/AOE-2020-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the majority of patients experiences locoregional relapse and/or distant metastasis even after radical resection of esophageal cancer, many efforts have been made and are ongoing to identify the optimal multimodality treatment strategy. The true benefit and harm of neoadjuvant therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy or the combination, is still difficult to interpret given the heterogeneity in patient and tumor characteristics. Nonetheless, neoadjuvant chemoradiation with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (the CROSS regimen) is considered standard of care for squamous cell carcinoma in Europe. Definitive chemoradiation is considered an equal alternative in the United States. For adenocarcinoma, preoperative chemoradiation with a platinum and 5FU or the CROSS regimen and peri-operative chemotherapy with a platinum and 5FU or the FLOT (fluorouracil, leukovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) regimen are all options. New developments in systemic anti-tumor therapy will most likely involve dual anti-HER2 inhibition or novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates for adenocarcinoma. Immunotherapy monotherapy in an unselected patient population does not seem to be as effective in esophageal cancer as it is in other cancer types. However, when we can correctly identify the subset of patients which does benefit from this treatment by employing new predictive markers, or find an effective synergistic combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy, immunotherapy could still improve patient outcome in the future.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the majority of patients experiences locoregional relapse and/or distant metastasis even after radical resection of esophageal cancer, many efforts have been made and are ongoing to identify the optimal multimodality treatment strategy. The true benefit and harm of neoadjuvant therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy or the combination, is still difficult to interpret given the heterogeneity in patient and tumor characteristics. Nonetheless, neoadjuvant chemoradiation with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (the CROSS regimen) is considered standard of care for squamous cell carcinoma in Europe. Definitive chemoradiation is considered an equal alternative in the United States. For adenocarcinoma, preoperative chemoradiation with a platinum and 5FU or the CROSS regimen and peri-operative chemotherapy with a platinum and 5FU or the FLOT (fluorouracil, leukovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) regimen are all options. New developments in systemic anti-tumor therapy will most likely involve dual anti-HER2 inhibition or novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates for adenocarcinoma. Immunotherapy monotherapy in an unselected patient population does not seem to be as effective in esophageal cancer as it is in other cancer types. However, when we can correctly identify the subset of patients which does benefit from this treatment by employing new predictive markers, or find an effective synergistic combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy, immunotherapy could still improve patient outcome in the future.
食管癌新辅助治疗的现状及新进展
由于大多数患者即使在食管癌症根治性切除后也会出现局部复发和/或远处转移,因此已经做出并正在进行许多努力来确定最佳的多模式治疗策略。考虑到患者和肿瘤特征的异质性,新辅助治疗(包括化疗、放疗或联合治疗)的真正益处和危害仍然难以解释。尽管如此,每周使用卡铂和紫杉醇的新辅助放化疗(CROSS方案)被认为是欧洲鳞状细胞癌的标准治疗方案。在美国,确定性放化疗被认为是一种同等的选择。对于腺癌,术前用铂和5FU或CROSS方案进行放化疗,以及围手术期用铂和5 FU或FLOT(氟尿嘧啶、脑白素、奥沙利铂和多西他赛)方案进行化疗都是可选的。系统性抗肿瘤治疗的新进展很可能涉及腺癌的双重抗HER2抑制或新型抗HER2抗体药物偶联物。在未经选择的患者群体中,免疫疗法单一疗法在食管癌症中似乎不如在其他癌症类型中有效。然而,当我们能够通过使用新的预测标志物正确识别出确实从这种治疗中受益的患者子集,或者找到免疫疗法与化疗和/或放疗的有效协同组合时,免疫疗法在未来仍然可以改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信