Reliability Test of a GNSS Onboard Receiver in the Kinematic Mode

J. Ćwiklak, K. Krasuski, M. Grzegorzewski
{"title":"Reliability Test of a GNSS Onboard Receiver in the Kinematic Mode","authors":"J. Ćwiklak, K. Krasuski, M. Grzegorzewski","doi":"10.1515/aon-2019-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article presents the results of the aircraft Cessna 172 positioning based on navigation solutions in the GPS and EGNOS (SBAS) tracking mode. The article makes a comparison of coordinate readings of the Cessna 172 in the ellipsoidal BLh frame. The verification of the coordinates of the aircraft Cessna 172 was used to assess the reliability of the GNSS satellite technique in aviation. In a research test, the navigation data were recorded by the onboard receiver Thales Mobile Mapper during an air test performed over the military aerodrome EPDE in Dęblin. Judging by the conducted investigations, it is possible to conclude that the difference in BLh coordinates of the aircraft Cessna 172 on the basis of the GPS solution and EGNOS (SBAS) solution equals, respectively: from −0.5 m to +3 m for component B; and from −2 m to +6 m for component L; from approximately −11 m to over +1 m for component h. In addition, the paper defines factors of dilution of precision PDOP, based on the GPS and EGNOS (SBAS) solutions. The average value of the PDOP coefficient for a solution in the tracking GPS mode was 2.7, whereas in the EGNOS (SBAS) tracking mode, it was equal to 2.8.","PeriodicalId":30601,"journal":{"name":"Annual of Navigation","volume":"26 1","pages":"106 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual of Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aon-2019-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article presents the results of the aircraft Cessna 172 positioning based on navigation solutions in the GPS and EGNOS (SBAS) tracking mode. The article makes a comparison of coordinate readings of the Cessna 172 in the ellipsoidal BLh frame. The verification of the coordinates of the aircraft Cessna 172 was used to assess the reliability of the GNSS satellite technique in aviation. In a research test, the navigation data were recorded by the onboard receiver Thales Mobile Mapper during an air test performed over the military aerodrome EPDE in Dęblin. Judging by the conducted investigations, it is possible to conclude that the difference in BLh coordinates of the aircraft Cessna 172 on the basis of the GPS solution and EGNOS (SBAS) solution equals, respectively: from −0.5 m to +3 m for component B; and from −2 m to +6 m for component L; from approximately −11 m to over +1 m for component h. In addition, the paper defines factors of dilution of precision PDOP, based on the GPS and EGNOS (SBAS) solutions. The average value of the PDOP coefficient for a solution in the tracking GPS mode was 2.7, whereas in the EGNOS (SBAS) tracking mode, it was equal to 2.8.
GNSS星载接收机在运动模式下的可靠性测试
摘要本文介绍了塞斯纳172飞机在GPS和EGNOS(SBAS)跟踪模式下基于导航解决方案的定位结果。本文对塞斯纳172在椭球BLh坐标系中的坐标读数进行了比较。对塞斯纳172飞机坐标的核查用于评估全球导航卫星系统卫星技术在航空领域的可靠性。在一次研究测试中,机载接收器泰雷兹移动测绘仪在DÉblin军用机场EPDE上空进行的空中测试中记录了导航数据。根据所进行的调查判断,可以得出结论,基于GPS解决方案和EGNOS(SBAS)解决方案的塞斯纳172飞机的BLh坐标差分别等于:对于部件B,从−0.5 m到+3 m;对于组分L,从−2 m到+6 m;对于组分h,从大约-11 m到超过+1 m。此外,本文还基于GPS和EGNOS(SBAS)解决方案定义了精度PDOP的稀释因子。在跟踪GPS模式下,解决方案的PDOP系数的平均值为2.7,而在EGNOS(SBAS)跟踪模式下,它等于2.8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信