Dosimetric Efficacy of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold in the Radiotherapy of Left Breast Cancer Patients Using the UK START Trial

Q3 Health Professions
A. Hafez, Dina M Abdelaziz, M. Khalil, M. Nagdy
{"title":"Dosimetric Efficacy of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold in the Radiotherapy of Left Breast Cancer Patients Using the UK START Trial","authors":"A. Hafez, Dina M Abdelaziz, M. Khalil, M. Nagdy","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2021.55746.1926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique is widely administered to left breast cancer (LBC) patients to reduce the radiation dose to the cardiopulmonary structures. The UK standardization of breast cancer radiotherapy (UK START) dose prescription was found comparable to the conventional schedule. The current study compared voluntary DIBH and free-breathing (FB) methods in the cardiopulmonary radiation doses of LBC patients with supraclavicular irradiation treated with the UK START trial. Materials and Methods: A computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired for a group of 50 LBC patients in DIBH and FB and a radiotherapy plan was created on each scan. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the heart and lung were analyzed against their relevant first clinical acceptance criteria using one-sample t-test. Additionally, we assessed the correlation between the ipsilateral lung volume expansion and the cardiopulmonary dosimetric benefits. Results: The DIBH technique significantly reduced the cardiopulmonary doses compared with the FB method (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean difference between the mean heart dose (MHD) and its first acceptance criterion was -62.6 cGy (p < 0.001), and the volume of the heart and lung received at least 16 Gy (Heart V16Gy and lung V16Gy, respectively) was lower than their first acceptance criteria by -0.63% and -2.18% (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, the first acceptance criteria of the cardiopulmonary dosimetric parameters were not accomplished with the FB method. In addition, the difference in MHD and heart V20Gy between DIBH and FB plans showed a moderate correlation with ipsilateral lung volume expansion (r = 0.51 and 0.5, respectively). Conclusion: The DIBH technique should be served to all locally advanced LBC patients, and the ipsilateral lung volume expansion could be a predictor for the cardiac-sparing radiotherapy in LBC.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2021.55746.1926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique is widely administered to left breast cancer (LBC) patients to reduce the radiation dose to the cardiopulmonary structures. The UK standardization of breast cancer radiotherapy (UK START) dose prescription was found comparable to the conventional schedule. The current study compared voluntary DIBH and free-breathing (FB) methods in the cardiopulmonary radiation doses of LBC patients with supraclavicular irradiation treated with the UK START trial. Materials and Methods: A computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired for a group of 50 LBC patients in DIBH and FB and a radiotherapy plan was created on each scan. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the heart and lung were analyzed against their relevant first clinical acceptance criteria using one-sample t-test. Additionally, we assessed the correlation between the ipsilateral lung volume expansion and the cardiopulmonary dosimetric benefits. Results: The DIBH technique significantly reduced the cardiopulmonary doses compared with the FB method (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean difference between the mean heart dose (MHD) and its first acceptance criterion was -62.6 cGy (p < 0.001), and the volume of the heart and lung received at least 16 Gy (Heart V16Gy and lung V16Gy, respectively) was lower than their first acceptance criteria by -0.63% and -2.18% (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, the first acceptance criteria of the cardiopulmonary dosimetric parameters were not accomplished with the FB method. In addition, the difference in MHD and heart V20Gy between DIBH and FB plans showed a moderate correlation with ipsilateral lung volume expansion (r = 0.51 and 0.5, respectively). Conclusion: The DIBH technique should be served to all locally advanced LBC patients, and the ipsilateral lung volume expansion could be a predictor for the cardiac-sparing radiotherapy in LBC.
自愿深吸气屏气在英国START试验左乳腺癌患者放疗中的剂量学疗效
简介:深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术广泛应用于左乳腺癌症(LBC)患者,以减少对心肺结构的辐射剂量。发现英国乳腺癌症放射治疗(UK START)剂量处方的标准化与传统计划相当。目前的研究比较了英国START试验治疗的锁骨上照射LBC患者的心肺辐射剂量的自主DIBH和自由呼吸(FB)方法。材料和方法:对DIBH和FB的50名LBC患者进行计算机断层扫描,并在每次扫描时制定放射治疗计划。心脏和肺部的剂量-体积直方图(DVH)参数根据其相关的第一临床接受标准使用单样本t检验进行分析。此外,我们评估了同侧肺容量扩张与心肺剂量测定益处之间的相关性。结果:与FB方法相比,DIBH技术显著降低了心肺剂量(p<0.001)。此外,平均心脏剂量(MHD)与其第一接受标准之间的平均差异为-62.6 cGy(p<0.01),并且接受至少16Gy的心脏和肺的体积(分别为心脏V16Gy和肺V16Gy)分别比它们的第一接受标准低-0.63%和-2.18%(p<0.001)。相反,FB方法并没有达到心肺剂量测定参数的第一个验收标准。此外,DIBH和FB计划之间MHD和心脏V20Gy的差异显示出与同侧肺容量扩张的中度相关性(分别为r=0.51和0.5)。结论:DIBH技术应适用于所有局部晚期LBC患者,同侧肺容量扩张可作为LBC保心放疗的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信