A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Local Administration of 1 Percent Metformin as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planning on Periodontal Intrabony Defects

Hussam M Alqahtani
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Local Administration of 1 Percent Metformin as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planning on Periodontal Intrabony Defects","authors":"Hussam M Alqahtani","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-2(4)-053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Purpose: This systematic review conducted to assess the effectiveness of local administration of 1 % Metformin as an adjunct to scaling and root planing on periodontal intrabony defects.\n\nMethods: Two independents reviewers searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov.We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of local administration of 1% metformin interventions in patients with periodontal intrabony defect undergoing scaling and root planing as compared to local administration of placebo gel where periodontal parameters were evaluated. The Cochrane RoB tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Meta-analyses for the quantitative data were performed. We assessed the level of certainty for our outcomes using (GRADE) tool. \n\nResults: Among the 1666 studies screened, two RCTs were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference for all outcomes except the plaque index.Quantitative analyses showed a weighted mean difference (WMD) of1.17 mm (95% CI=1.01 to 1.34 mm, P<0.00001) for depth of periodontal intrabony defect; a WMD of 2.54 mm (95% CI=2.20 to 2.88 mm, P<0.00001) for clinical attachment level;a WMD of 2.01 mm (95%CI=1.68 to 2.33 mm, P<0.00001) for probing depth (PD);a WMD of 0.38 (95% CI=0.14 to 0.62, P = 0.002) for bleeding on probing (BOP); and a WMD of 0.00 mm (95% CI=−0.04 to 0.04 mm, P=0.95) for plaque index. There is moderate certainty of the evidence for all outcomes.\n\nConclusions: Local application of 1% metformin in patients with periodontal intrabony defect may improve the clinical and radiographic periodontal parameters. Future clinical trials are required to confirm the clinical benefits of a 1% metformin application as adjunctive to scaling and root planing in patients with periodontal intrabony defect.\n\nTrial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD167223.","PeriodicalId":92922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-2(4)-053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Purpose: This systematic review conducted to assess the effectiveness of local administration of 1 % Metformin as an adjunct to scaling and root planing on periodontal intrabony defects. Methods: Two independents reviewers searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov.We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of local administration of 1% metformin interventions in patients with periodontal intrabony defect undergoing scaling and root planing as compared to local administration of placebo gel where periodontal parameters were evaluated. The Cochrane RoB tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Meta-analyses for the quantitative data were performed. We assessed the level of certainty for our outcomes using (GRADE) tool. Results: Among the 1666 studies screened, two RCTs were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference for all outcomes except the plaque index.Quantitative analyses showed a weighted mean difference (WMD) of1.17 mm (95% CI=1.01 to 1.34 mm, P<0.00001) for depth of periodontal intrabony defect; a WMD of 2.54 mm (95% CI=2.20 to 2.88 mm, P<0.00001) for clinical attachment level;a WMD of 2.01 mm (95%CI=1.68 to 2.33 mm, P<0.00001) for probing depth (PD);a WMD of 0.38 (95% CI=0.14 to 0.62, P = 0.002) for bleeding on probing (BOP); and a WMD of 0.00 mm (95% CI=−0.04 to 0.04 mm, P=0.95) for plaque index. There is moderate certainty of the evidence for all outcomes. Conclusions: Local application of 1% metformin in patients with periodontal intrabony defect may improve the clinical and radiographic periodontal parameters. Future clinical trials are required to confirm the clinical benefits of a 1% metformin application as adjunctive to scaling and root planing in patients with periodontal intrabony defect. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD167223.
局部应用1%二甲双胍辅助牙周骨内缺损刮治和根管规划的系统评价和荟萃分析
目的:本系统综述旨在评估1%二甲双胍局部给药作为牙周骨内缺损刮治和牙根刨削辅助治疗的有效性。方法:两名独立评审员检索Cochrane对照试验中央登记册(Central)MEDLINE,和ClinicalTrials.gov。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),即在接受洁治和牙根刨削的牙周骨内缺陷患者中局部给予1%二甲双胍干预,与局部给予安慰剂凝胶(评估牙周参数)相比。Cochrane RoB工具用于评估偏倚的风险。对定量数据进行荟萃分析。我们使用(GRADE)工具评估了结果的确定性水平。结果:在筛选的1666项研究中,有两项随机对照试验被纳入荟萃分析。荟萃分析显示,除斑块指数外,所有结果均有统计学显著差异。定量分析显示,牙周骨内缺损深度的加权平均差(WMD)为1.7mm(95%CI=1.01至1.34mm,P<0.00001);临床附着水平的WMD为2.54mm(95%CI=2.20至2.88mm,P<0.00001);探测深度(PD)的WMD为2.01 mm(95%CI=1.68至2.33 mm,P<0.00001);探测出血(BOP)的WMD为0.38(95%CI=0.14至0.62,P=0.002);斑块指数的WMD为0.00 mm(95%CI=-0.04至0.04 mm,P=0.95)。所有结果都有适度的证据确定性。结论:1%二甲双胍在牙周骨内缺损患者中的局部应用可改善临床和放射学牙周参数。未来的临床试验需要确认1%二甲双胍作为牙周骨内缺损患者刮治和牙根刨削辅助药物的临床益处。试验注册:国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO):CRD167223。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信