Implementing a Joint Operational Plan in Medical Sciences Universities: A Qualitative Policy Analysis in Iran

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Reza Aghebati, L. Doshmangir, J. Tabrizi, A. Jannati, V. S. Gordeev
{"title":"Implementing a Joint Operational Plan in Medical Sciences Universities: A Qualitative Policy Analysis in Iran","authors":"Reza Aghebati, L. Doshmangir, J. Tabrizi, A. Jannati, V. S. Gordeev","doi":"10.5812/jhealthscope-135609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The joint operational plan was introduced by Iran’s Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2015 as a way to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare services by promoting collaboration and coordination among medical sciences universities. The plan aimed to address issues related to overlapping responsibilities, duplication of efforts, and resource constraints among universities. Objectives: This study was conducted to analyze this policy intervention and explore its challenges and opportunities. Methods: Using a qualitative policy analysis approach, this study collected data through documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders at various health system levels. Research participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods. The collected data were analyzed using the framework analysis approach, supported by the policy triangle framework and heuristic model. Results: The policy analysis results yielded 14 categories and 29 sub-categories grouped into four overarching themes: Content, context, process, and actors/stakeholders. The content theme included categories such as the plan’s goals, the linkage between the plan’s goals and upstream policy documents, and the consistency between the plan’s goals and the visions and missions of medical universities. The context theme included structural characteristics, economic and financial factors, and social and cultural situations. The process theme included the issue’s priority, service delivery, policy design and formulation, implementation approach, and assessment and evaluation. The actors/stakeholders theme included categories such as the owner and leader of the policy, political support, and ambiguity in assigning responsibilities. Conclusions: While enforcing a joint operational plan in medical universities can boost performance and foster competition, it may also hinder universities’ ability to pursue innovative interventions and activities outside the plan. To address this issue, stakeholders from various health system levels should work together to modify the plan’s development and implementation process. Effective use of planning tools is crucial for ensuring that medical universities and the health system achieve their goals.","PeriodicalId":12857,"journal":{"name":"Health Scope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Scope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope-135609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The joint operational plan was introduced by Iran’s Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2015 as a way to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare services by promoting collaboration and coordination among medical sciences universities. The plan aimed to address issues related to overlapping responsibilities, duplication of efforts, and resource constraints among universities. Objectives: This study was conducted to analyze this policy intervention and explore its challenges and opportunities. Methods: Using a qualitative policy analysis approach, this study collected data through documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders at various health system levels. Research participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods. The collected data were analyzed using the framework analysis approach, supported by the policy triangle framework and heuristic model. Results: The policy analysis results yielded 14 categories and 29 sub-categories grouped into four overarching themes: Content, context, process, and actors/stakeholders. The content theme included categories such as the plan’s goals, the linkage between the plan’s goals and upstream policy documents, and the consistency between the plan’s goals and the visions and missions of medical universities. The context theme included structural characteristics, economic and financial factors, and social and cultural situations. The process theme included the issue’s priority, service delivery, policy design and formulation, implementation approach, and assessment and evaluation. The actors/stakeholders theme included categories such as the owner and leader of the policy, political support, and ambiguity in assigning responsibilities. Conclusions: While enforcing a joint operational plan in medical universities can boost performance and foster competition, it may also hinder universities’ ability to pursue innovative interventions and activities outside the plan. To address this issue, stakeholders from various health system levels should work together to modify the plan’s development and implementation process. Effective use of planning tools is crucial for ensuring that medical universities and the health system achieve their goals.
实施医学大学联合行动计划:伊朗定性政策分析
背景:伊朗卫生和医学教育部于2015年推出了联合行动计划,旨在通过促进医学大学之间的合作与协调来提高医疗服务的质量和效率。该计划旨在解决与大学之间职责重叠、工作重复和资源限制有关的问题。目的:本研究旨在分析这种政策干预,并探讨其挑战和机遇。方法:采用定性政策分析方法,本研究通过文献分析和对不同卫生系统层面利益相关者的半结构化访谈收集数据。研究参与者采用有目的和滚雪球抽样方法进行选择。在政策三角框架和启发式模型的支持下,使用框架分析方法对收集的数据进行分析。结果:政策分析结果产生了14个类别和29个子类别,分为四个总体主题:内容、背景、过程和行为者/利益攸关方。内容主题包括计划目标、计划目标与上游政策文件之间的联系以及计划目标与医科大学愿景和使命之间的一致性等类别。背景主题包括结构特征、经济和金融因素以及社会和文化状况。进程主题包括该问题的优先事项、服务提供、政策设计和制定、执行方法以及评估和评价。行动者/利益相关者的主题包括政策的所有者和领导者、政治支持和职责分配的模糊性等类别。结论:虽然在医科大学实施联合行动计划可以提高绩效和促进竞争,但也可能阻碍大学在计划外进行创新干预和活动的能力。为了解决这个问题,来自不同卫生系统层面的利益相关者应该共同努力,修改该计划的制定和实施过程。有效利用规划工具对于确保医科大学和卫生系统实现其目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Scope
Health Scope PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信