{"title":"A Retrospective Study of 657 Women With Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (VaIN)","authors":"F. Meng, Yunyun Cao, Yudong Wang","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-655431/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics of patients with VaIN and identify more sensitive diagnostic methods.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 657 patients with VaIN from the International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Shanghai during a ten-year period. Results: Among the 657 patients, 26.5% were diagnosed with VaIN 2/3. The proportions of patients with VaIN 2/3 among those who did and did not undergo hysterectomy were 39.5% and 24.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of cytology for VaIN in those with only VaIN, VaIN concomitant with cervical or vulvar lesions, and posthysterectomy VaIN was 56.7%, 66.5%, and 72.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of hrHPV for VaIN in the same categories was 87.7%, 86.5%, and 74.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of cytology and hrHPV cotesting for VaIN in the same categories was 95.2%, 95.6%, and 95.0%, respectively. In patients who did not undergo hysterectomy, HPV16 was detected in 9.5% of VaIN 1 lesions among the HPV DNA-positive patients, while the other 12 types of HPV were detected in 62.6% of VaIN 1 lesions. In patients who underwent hysterectomy, HPV16 was detected in 2.1% of VaIN 1 lesions, and the other 12 types of HPV were detected in 54.2% of VaIN 1 lesions.Conclusions: A combination of cytology and colposcopy could increase the sensitivity of the diagnosis of VaIN. The other 12 high-risk types of HPV positive may be more closely related to VAIN 1, more attention should be paid.","PeriodicalId":11903,"journal":{"name":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-655431/v1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics of patients with VaIN and identify more sensitive diagnostic methods.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 657 patients with VaIN from the International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Shanghai during a ten-year period. Results: Among the 657 patients, 26.5% were diagnosed with VaIN 2/3. The proportions of patients with VaIN 2/3 among those who did and did not undergo hysterectomy were 39.5% and 24.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of cytology for VaIN in those with only VaIN, VaIN concomitant with cervical or vulvar lesions, and posthysterectomy VaIN was 56.7%, 66.5%, and 72.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of hrHPV for VaIN in the same categories was 87.7%, 86.5%, and 74.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of cytology and hrHPV cotesting for VaIN in the same categories was 95.2%, 95.6%, and 95.0%, respectively. In patients who did not undergo hysterectomy, HPV16 was detected in 9.5% of VaIN 1 lesions among the HPV DNA-positive patients, while the other 12 types of HPV were detected in 62.6% of VaIN 1 lesions. In patients who underwent hysterectomy, HPV16 was detected in 2.1% of VaIN 1 lesions, and the other 12 types of HPV were detected in 54.2% of VaIN 1 lesions.Conclusions: A combination of cytology and colposcopy could increase the sensitivity of the diagnosis of VaIN. The other 12 high-risk types of HPV positive may be more closely related to VAIN 1, more attention should be paid.
期刊介绍:
EJGO is dedicated to publishing editorial articles in the Distinguished Expert Series and original research papers, case reports, letters to the Editor, book reviews, and newsletters. The Journal was founded in 1980 the second gynaecologic oncology hyperspecialization Journal in the world. Its aim is the diffusion of scientific, clinical and practical progress, and knowledge in female neoplastic diseases in an interdisciplinary approach among gynaecologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons, chemotherapists, pathologists, epidemiologists, and so on.