Gripping Technique for Endotracheal Tube- Beedi vs Cigarette Grip, which is better?

Rajadurai, Meenakshisundaram, Joshua, Vijay, Joseph, Prathap, Pancheti, D. Sampath, SM Nayyara Banu, Kaviarasu, Ravichandran
{"title":"Gripping Technique for Endotracheal Tube- Beedi vs Cigarette Grip, which is better?","authors":"Rajadurai, Meenakshisundaram, Joshua, Vijay, Joseph, Prathap, Pancheti, D. Sampath, SM Nayyara Banu, Kaviarasu, Ravichandran","doi":"10.29011/2475-5605.010116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of two manual grips for holding Endotracheal (ET) tube during confirmation, fixation and patient movement. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing endotracheal intubation and intubated patients undergoing shifting in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary level hospital. This was done over a period of 14 months from August 2020 to September 2021. The method of holding the ET tube manually using Cigarette grip (holding with index and middle finger) vs Beedi grip (holding with thumb and index finger) prior to fixation and during patient movement was the variable taken into account and displacement of the ET tube if any was noted as outcome. Results: During the study period, a total of 134 intubations were done and among them 196 instances had intrahospital transfer from ED. Beedi grip method was used in 74 (55.2%) patients compared to cigarette grip for 60 (44.8%) patients during fixation of ET tube. The most common reason for intrahospital shifting was for radiological imaging 114 patients followed by intensive care shifting of 82 patients. None of the patients had complete dislodgement of ET tube but displacement was seen in 6 (10%) patients cigarette grip vs 2 (2.7%) patients beedi grip during fixation. During shifting 18 (20.5%) patients with cigarette grip had displacement of ET tube vs 4 (3.7%) patients with beedi grip. Conclusion: In spite of ET intubations being a very common procedure, user variations exist regarding proper holding of the ET tube manually. The Beedi grip used for fine holding provides a more stable method of holding the ET tube as compared to the cigarette method.","PeriodicalId":92630,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine investigations","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2475-5605.010116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of two manual grips for holding Endotracheal (ET) tube during confirmation, fixation and patient movement. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing endotracheal intubation and intubated patients undergoing shifting in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary level hospital. This was done over a period of 14 months from August 2020 to September 2021. The method of holding the ET tube manually using Cigarette grip (holding with index and middle finger) vs Beedi grip (holding with thumb and index finger) prior to fixation and during patient movement was the variable taken into account and displacement of the ET tube if any was noted as outcome. Results: During the study period, a total of 134 intubations were done and among them 196 instances had intrahospital transfer from ED. Beedi grip method was used in 74 (55.2%) patients compared to cigarette grip for 60 (44.8%) patients during fixation of ET tube. The most common reason for intrahospital shifting was for radiological imaging 114 patients followed by intensive care shifting of 82 patients. None of the patients had complete dislodgement of ET tube but displacement was seen in 6 (10%) patients cigarette grip vs 2 (2.7%) patients beedi grip during fixation. During shifting 18 (20.5%) patients with cigarette grip had displacement of ET tube vs 4 (3.7%) patients with beedi grip. Conclusion: In spite of ET intubations being a very common procedure, user variations exist regarding proper holding of the ET tube manually. The Beedi grip used for fine holding provides a more stable method of holding the ET tube as compared to the cigarette method.
气管插管夹持技术-比迪与香烟夹持,哪个更好?
目的:比较两种手握器在气管插管确认、固定及患者移动过程中的效果。方法:对某三级医院急诊科(ED)气管插管成人患者和换班气管插管患者进行前瞻性观察研究。这是在2020年8月至2021年9月的14个月内完成的。在固定前和患者移动期间,手动使用卷烟握(用食指和中指握住)和Beedi握(用拇指和食指握住)握住ET管的方法是考虑的变量,如果注意到有ET管的位移,则将其作为结果。结果:研究期间共插管134例,其中急诊转院196例,固定ET管时采用Beedi夹法74例(55.2%),采用香烟夹法60例(44.8%)。院内转院最常见的原因是放射成像114例,其次是重症监护82例。没有患者出现ET管完全移位,但在固定期间,有6例(10%)患者用香烟握住ET管,2例(2.7%)患者用豌豆握住ET管。在移位过程中,香烟握持组有18例(20.5%)出现ET管移位,而毛豆握持组有4例(3.7%)。结论:尽管ET插管是一种非常常见的程序,但用户在手动正确持有ET管方面存在差异。与香烟方法相比,用于精细持有的Beedi握把提供了一种更稳定的持有ET管的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信