“Look’d Like Milk”: Colonialism and Infant Feeding in the English Atlantic World

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Carla Cevasco
{"title":"“Look’d Like Milk”: Colonialism and Infant Feeding in the English Atlantic World","authors":"Carla Cevasco","doi":"10.1163/18770703-10020009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nWhile wet nursing interactions between enslaved women of African descent and colonial women have received extensive scholarly attention, much remains to be done in understanding colonial and Native women’s interactions around breastfeeding and infant feeding. This article close-reads two captivity narratives in which baby food features prominently: God’s Protecting Providence, Jonathan Dickinson’s 1699 narrative of being shipwrecked among Ais, Jeaga, Jobé, Santaluces, and Surruque Indians in coastal Florida in 1696; and God’s Mercy Surmounting Man’s Cruelty, Elizabeth Hanson’s 1728 narrative of being captured by Wabanaki people during Dummer’s War in 1724. Captivity rendered the colonists dependent upon intimate Native care for the survival of their children. When Dickinson and Hanson crafted their narratives of their captivities, however, they sought to reinscribe colonial supremacy after experiences that called it into question. The complexities of colonial-Native interactions around infant feeding in these sources demonstrate the need for further scholarship on reproduction and settler colonialism.","PeriodicalId":53896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early American History","volume":"10 1","pages":"147-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18770703-10020009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While wet nursing interactions between enslaved women of African descent and colonial women have received extensive scholarly attention, much remains to be done in understanding colonial and Native women’s interactions around breastfeeding and infant feeding. This article close-reads two captivity narratives in which baby food features prominently: God’s Protecting Providence, Jonathan Dickinson’s 1699 narrative of being shipwrecked among Ais, Jeaga, Jobé, Santaluces, and Surruque Indians in coastal Florida in 1696; and God’s Mercy Surmounting Man’s Cruelty, Elizabeth Hanson’s 1728 narrative of being captured by Wabanaki people during Dummer’s War in 1724. Captivity rendered the colonists dependent upon intimate Native care for the survival of their children. When Dickinson and Hanson crafted their narratives of their captivities, however, they sought to reinscribe colonial supremacy after experiences that called it into question. The complexities of colonial-Native interactions around infant feeding in these sources demonstrate the need for further scholarship on reproduction and settler colonialism.
“看起来像牛奶”:殖民主义与英国大西洋世界的婴儿喂养
虽然被奴役的非洲裔妇女和殖民地妇女之间的湿法护理互动受到了广泛的学术关注,但在理解殖民地妇女和土著妇女在母乳喂养和婴儿喂养方面的互动方面还有很多工作要做。这篇文章细读了两个婴儿食品突出的圈养故事:上帝的保护普罗维登斯,乔纳森·迪金森1699年讲述的1696年在佛罗里达州沿海的艾斯、杰加、乔贝、圣塔卢斯和苏鲁克印第安人中遭遇海难的故事;伊丽莎白·汉森1728年讲述的1724年杜默战争期间被瓦巴纳基人俘虏的故事。被俘使殖民者不得不依靠土著人的亲密照顾来维持孩子的生存。然而,当狄金森和汉森精心讲述他们的魅力时,他们试图在经历了令人质疑的殖民霸权之后,重新确立殖民霸权。这些来源中殖民地原住民围绕婴儿喂养的互动的复杂性表明,需要进一步研究繁殖和定居者殖民主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信