Improved image quality with deep learning reconstruction – a study on a semi-anthropomorphic upper-abdomen phantom

Tormund Njølstad MD , Anselm Schulz MD PhD , Kristin Jensen PhD , Hilde K. Andersen MSc , Anne Catrine T. Martinsen PhD
{"title":"Improved image quality with deep learning reconstruction – a study on a semi-anthropomorphic upper-abdomen phantom","authors":"Tormund Njølstad MD ,&nbsp;Anselm Schulz MD PhD ,&nbsp;Kristin Jensen PhD ,&nbsp;Hilde K. Andersen MSc ,&nbsp;Anne Catrine T. Martinsen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2023.100022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess image quality of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm across dose levels using a semi-anthropomorphic upper-abdominal phantom, and compare with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>CT scans obtained at five dose levels (CTDI<sub>vol</sub> 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mGy) were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR (IR50, IR70 and IR90) and DLR of low (DLL), medium (DLM) and high strength (DLH) in 0.625 mm and 2.5 mm slices. CT number, homogeneity, noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), noise texture deviation (NTD; a measure of IR-specific artifacts), noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were compared between reconstruction algorithms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CT numbers were highly consistent across reconstruction algorithms. Image noise was significantly reduced with higher levels of DLR. Noise texture (NPS and NTD) was with DLR maintained at comparable levels to FBP, contrary to increasing levels of hybrid IR. Images reconstructed with DLR of low and high strength in 0.625 mm slices showed similar noise characteristics to 2.5 mm slice FBP and IR50, respectively. Dose-reduction potential based on image noise with IR50 as reference was estimated to 35% for DLM and 74% for DLH.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The novel DLR algorithm demonstrates robust noise reduction with maintained noise texture characteristics despite higher algorithm strength, and may have overcome important limitations of IR. There may be potential for dose reduction and additional benefit from thin-slice reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652523000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

To assess image quality of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm across dose levels using a semi-anthropomorphic upper-abdominal phantom, and compare with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

Material and methods

CT scans obtained at five dose levels (CTDIvol 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mGy) were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR (IR50, IR70 and IR90) and DLR of low (DLL), medium (DLM) and high strength (DLH) in 0.625 mm and 2.5 mm slices. CT number, homogeneity, noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), noise texture deviation (NTD; a measure of IR-specific artifacts), noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were compared between reconstruction algorithms.

Results

CT numbers were highly consistent across reconstruction algorithms. Image noise was significantly reduced with higher levels of DLR. Noise texture (NPS and NTD) was with DLR maintained at comparable levels to FBP, contrary to increasing levels of hybrid IR. Images reconstructed with DLR of low and high strength in 0.625 mm slices showed similar noise characteristics to 2.5 mm slice FBP and IR50, respectively. Dose-reduction potential based on image noise with IR50 as reference was estimated to 35% for DLM and 74% for DLH.

Conclusions

The novel DLR algorithm demonstrates robust noise reduction with maintained noise texture characteristics despite higher algorithm strength, and may have overcome important limitations of IR. There may be potential for dose reduction and additional benefit from thin-slice reconstruction.

通过深度学习重建提高图像质量——对半拟人化上腹部体模的研究
目的使用半拟人化上腹部体模评估深度学习重建(DLR)算法在不同剂量水平下的图像质量,并与滤波反投影(FBP)和混合迭代重建(IR)进行比较。材料和方法用FBP、混合IR(IR50、IR70和IR90)和低(DLL)、中(DLM)和高强度(DLH)的DLR在0.625mm和2.5mm的切片中重建在5个剂量水平(CTDIvol 5、10、15、20和25mGy)下获得的CT扫描。比较了重建算法之间的CT数量、均匀性、噪声、对比度、对比噪声比(CNR)、噪声纹理偏差(NTD;IR特异性伪影的测量)、噪声功率谱(NPS)和基于任务的传递函数(TTF)。结果不同重建算法的CT数字高度一致。DLR水平越高,图像噪声显著降低。噪声纹理(NPS和NTD)与混合IR水平的增加相反,DLR保持在与FBP相当的水平。在0.625mm切片中用低强度和高强度DLR重建的图像分别显示出与2.5mm切片FBP和IR50相似的噪声特性。基于以IR50为参考的图像噪声的剂量减少潜力估计DLM为35%,DLH为74%。结论新的DLR算法表现出稳健的降噪效果,尽管算法强度较高,但仍保持了噪声纹理特性,并可能克服了IR的重要局限性。薄层重建可能具有降低剂量的潜力和额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信