Assessment of procedural pain in French emergency departments: a multi-site, non-interventional, transverse study in patients with minor trauma injury

J. Truchot, Karima Mezaïb, A. Ricard-Hibon, E. Vicaut, Y. Claessens, L. Soulat, J. Milon, A. Serrié, P. Plaisance
{"title":"Assessment of procedural pain in French emergency departments: a multi-site, non-interventional, transverse study in patients with minor trauma injury","authors":"J. Truchot, Karima Mezaïb, A. Ricard-Hibon, E. Vicaut, Y. Claessens, L. Soulat, J. Milon, A. Serrié, P. Plaisance","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2019.1646074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the mean number of procedural painful episodes per patient, and to retrieve information regarding diagnosis, therapeutic procedures and analgesic management, in patients visiting Emergency Departments (EDs) for minor trauma. Methods: This observational, non-interventional, multicenter study in adult patients was performed in 35 French EDs. All patients entering the EDs for minor trauma on a specified day between noon and 10 pm were registered; consenting patients were included in the study. Pain intensity was assessed using a verbal Numerical Rating Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). An episode was described as painful if the difference in pain intensity between pain just before the procedure and maximal pain during the procedure was ≥2. Two independent nurses recorded data on 1 day in each center. Results: Overall, 909 patients were registered, 422 were included in the study, and complete data for 409 patients (1899 procedures) were available for analysis. The mean number of painful episodes per patient was 1.0 ± 1.3. Fifty-one percent of patients reported at least one painful procedure episode. Twenty-one percent of procedures were considered painful. Clinical examination was the procedure most often reported as painful. No preventive or curative analgesic treatment was reported in 95.1% of procedures. Conclusions: There is a need for improvement in routine pain assessment and, therefore, procedural pain management for ED patients. Specific protocols should be developed for procedural pain management, and teams should be trained especially for procedures usually not considered painful.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"47 1","pages":"143 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2019.1646074","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2019.1646074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the mean number of procedural painful episodes per patient, and to retrieve information regarding diagnosis, therapeutic procedures and analgesic management, in patients visiting Emergency Departments (EDs) for minor trauma. Methods: This observational, non-interventional, multicenter study in adult patients was performed in 35 French EDs. All patients entering the EDs for minor trauma on a specified day between noon and 10 pm were registered; consenting patients were included in the study. Pain intensity was assessed using a verbal Numerical Rating Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). An episode was described as painful if the difference in pain intensity between pain just before the procedure and maximal pain during the procedure was ≥2. Two independent nurses recorded data on 1 day in each center. Results: Overall, 909 patients were registered, 422 were included in the study, and complete data for 409 patients (1899 procedures) were available for analysis. The mean number of painful episodes per patient was 1.0 ± 1.3. Fifty-one percent of patients reported at least one painful procedure episode. Twenty-one percent of procedures were considered painful. Clinical examination was the procedure most often reported as painful. No preventive or curative analgesic treatment was reported in 95.1% of procedures. Conclusions: There is a need for improvement in routine pain assessment and, therefore, procedural pain management for ED patients. Specific protocols should be developed for procedural pain management, and teams should be trained especially for procedures usually not considered painful.
法国急诊科手术疼痛评估:一项针对轻伤患者的多部位、非介入性横向研究
摘要目的:确定每名患者的平均手术疼痛发作次数,并检索有关轻微创伤急诊科患者的诊断、治疗程序和镇痛管理的信息。方法:这项针对成年患者的观察性、非介入性、多中心研究在35名法国急诊科进行。所有在指定日期中午至晚上10点因轻微创伤进入急诊科的患者都进行了登记;同意的患者被纳入研究。使用从0(无疼痛)到10(最严重的疼痛)的口头数字评定量表评估疼痛强度。如果手术前疼痛和手术期间最大疼痛之间的疼痛强度差异≥2,则将发作描述为疼痛。两名独立护士在每个中心记录了一天的数据。结果:总共登记了909名患者,422名患者被纳入研究,409名患者(1899例手术)的完整数据可供分析。每位患者的平均疼痛发作次数为1.0±1.3。51%的患者报告至少有一次疼痛的手术发作。21%的手术被认为是痛苦的。临床检查是最常被报道为疼痛的过程。95.1%的手术中未报告预防性或治疗性镇痛治疗。结论:ED患者的常规疼痛评估和程序性疼痛管理需要改进。应制定程序性疼痛管理的具体方案,团队应接受培训,尤其是对于通常不被认为疼痛的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信