Transmedia history

IF 0.5 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Rethinking History Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13642529.2021.1963597

Ilkka Lähteenmäki

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I argue that history is a large-scale transmedia project that is not understood as such, and this causes friction when history is engaged with through media in which historical research is not usually presented. To do this, I go through Henry Jenkins’ ten-step definition of transmedia and argue that history matches the definition very well. This transmedia discussion brings forth the concept of ‘world-building’, in which narrative is superseded by world-building as the all-encompassing concept and as the beginning point of analysis. In the analysis, history (as a product of historiography) is treated as phenomenon instead of a discipline and compared to other forms of transmedia world-building.

查看原文本刊更多论文

跨媒体历史

在本文中，我认为历史是一个大规模的跨媒体项目，但人们并不这样理解它，当历史通过通常不呈现历史研究的媒体参与时，这就造成了摩擦。为此，我回顾了Henry Jenkins关于跨媒体的十步定义，并认为历史与这一定义非常吻合。这种跨媒体讨论提出了“世界构建”的概念，在这个概念中，叙事被世界构建所取代，成为包罗万象的概念和分析的起点。在分析中，历史(作为史学的产物)被视为一种现象，而不是一门学科，并与其他形式的跨媒体世界构建相比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rethinking History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This acclaimed journal allows historians in a broad range of specialities to experiment with new ways of presenting and interpreting history. Rethinking History challenges the accepted ways of doing history and rethinks the traditional paradigms, providing a unique forum in which practitioners and theorists can debate and expand the boundaries of the discipline.