Наука та аудит. Гештальт ще не закрито

О. Y. Redko
{"title":"Наука та аудит. Гештальт ще не закрито","authors":"О. Y. Redko","doi":"10.31767/su.1(100)2023.01.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article critically analyzes the state of modern Ukrainian audit science. It is noted that over the past five years there have been 310 defenses of theses in the specialty \"Accounting, analysis and audit\", of which only 8% were devoted exclusively to audit topics, including only 3% for obtaining the scientific degree of Doctor of Economic Sciences. Analyzing the declared topic of scientific research, the author draws attention to the fact that scientists research questions that are, so to speak, \"by ear\" in the professional environment. This is mainly a question of audit quality and its external and internal control. Unfortunately, there are no studies that would develop, first of all, the audit methodology, its methods and procedures, the peculiarities of auditing in computer networks. The author notes the parallel existence of audit science and practice. The reason given is the impossibility of combining scientific research with practical audit activity, the lack of interest of audit practitioners in the results of scientific research. Analyzing the scientific work of institutions of higher education, the author states the parallel existence of audit science and practice. The reason given is the impossibility of combining scientific research with practical audit activity, the lack of interest of audit practitioners in the results of scientific research. Analyzing the scientific work of institutions of higher education, the author singles out a small number of centers where audit is researched, among which examines the work of the Audit Scientific School of the National Center for Accounting and Audit of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit. In the article, the author makes several proposals that, in his opinion, can improve the interaction of Ukrainian science and auditing practice.","PeriodicalId":52812,"journal":{"name":"Statistika Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31767/su.1(100)2023.01.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article critically analyzes the state of modern Ukrainian audit science. It is noted that over the past five years there have been 310 defenses of theses in the specialty "Accounting, analysis and audit", of which only 8% were devoted exclusively to audit topics, including only 3% for obtaining the scientific degree of Doctor of Economic Sciences. Analyzing the declared topic of scientific research, the author draws attention to the fact that scientists research questions that are, so to speak, "by ear" in the professional environment. This is mainly a question of audit quality and its external and internal control. Unfortunately, there are no studies that would develop, first of all, the audit methodology, its methods and procedures, the peculiarities of auditing in computer networks. The author notes the parallel existence of audit science and practice. The reason given is the impossibility of combining scientific research with practical audit activity, the lack of interest of audit practitioners in the results of scientific research. Analyzing the scientific work of institutions of higher education, the author states the parallel existence of audit science and practice. The reason given is the impossibility of combining scientific research with practical audit activity, the lack of interest of audit practitioners in the results of scientific research. Analyzing the scientific work of institutions of higher education, the author singles out a small number of centers where audit is researched, among which examines the work of the Audit Scientific School of the National Center for Accounting and Audit of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit. In the article, the author makes several proposals that, in his opinion, can improve the interaction of Ukrainian science and auditing practice.
科学审计。格施塔托还没死
本文批判性地分析了乌克兰现代审计科学的现状。值得注意的是,在过去的五年里,“会计、分析与审计”专业共有310篇论文答辩,其中只有8%专门针对审计主题,其中只有3%获得了经济科学博士的科学学位。在分析已宣布的科学研究主题时,作者提请注意这样一个事实,即科学家在专业环境中研究问题,可以说是“耳听途说”的。这主要是审计质量及其外部和内部控制的问题。不幸的是,没有任何研究能够首先发展审计方法、方法和程序,以及计算机网络审计的特点。笔者注意到审计科学与审计实践的并行性。给出的原因是不可能将科学研究与实际审计活动相结合,审计从业人员对科学研究结果缺乏兴趣。通过对高校科学工作的分析,阐述了审计科学与实践的并行性。给出的原因是不可能将科学研究与实际审计活动相结合,审计从业人员对科学研究结果缺乏兴趣。在分析高等教育机构的科学工作的基础上,作者挑出了少数审计研究中心,其中考察了国家统计、会计和审计研究院国家会计和审计中心审计科学学院的工作。在文章中,作者提出了几点建议,以改善乌克兰科学与审计实践的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信