Evaluating the relationship between dimensions of the upper airway and facial profile according to initial lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic patients in the north of Iran

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Faeghe Gholinia , Fateme Tavanayan , Erfane Afsari Ardchi , Shadman Nemati
{"title":"Evaluating the relationship between dimensions of the upper airway and facial profile according to initial lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic patients in the north of Iran","authors":"Faeghe Gholinia ,&nbsp;Fateme Tavanayan ,&nbsp;Erfane Afsari Ardchi ,&nbsp;Shadman Nemati","doi":"10.1016/j.odw.2019.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Decreased upper airway dimensions due to adenoid enlargement may have unfavorable aesthetic and/or functional effects on the soft or hard tissue profile development. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between adenoid sizes to upper airway size ratio (airway ratio) in the midsagittal plane and various types of soft and hard tissue facial profile convexity.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>251 lateral cephalometric<span> images of pre-orthodontic healthy subjects with age group of 6•12, 13•18, 19•25 and 26•29 years, were collected. They were classified into four subgroups based on the airway ratio (grade 1: &lt;1/4 í 100), (grade 2: 1/4•1/2 í 100), (grade 3:1/2•3/4 í 100) and (grade 4: &gt;3/4 í 100). The radiographs were characterized as convex, normal and concave soft tissue facial profile according to the facial convexity angle. Cephalometric analyses were done using Dolphin imaging computer software 11.95. Kruskal Wallis test was used to evaluate differences between airway ratio and facial morphologies; the mandibular plane angle was compared between airway ratio subgroups by Chi square.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Airway ratio was not significantly different (<em>P</em> = 0.241) between soft tissue facial convexity subgroups and within age subgroups. Mandibular plane angle was in a significant relation within airway ratio (<em>p</em> = 0.028).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was not any significant relation between decreased upper airway ratios and types of the soft or hard tissue facial profile convexity, however there was a significant relation between upper airway ratios and age subgroups. A significant revers correlation was seen between the mandibular plane angle and nasopharyngeal dimensions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.odw.2019.08.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344024118302371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose

Decreased upper airway dimensions due to adenoid enlargement may have unfavorable aesthetic and/or functional effects on the soft or hard tissue profile development. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between adenoid sizes to upper airway size ratio (airway ratio) in the midsagittal plane and various types of soft and hard tissue facial profile convexity.

Materials and methods

251 lateral cephalometric images of pre-orthodontic healthy subjects with age group of 6•12, 13•18, 19•25 and 26•29 years, were collected. They were classified into four subgroups based on the airway ratio (grade 1: <1/4 í 100), (grade 2: 1/4•1/2 í 100), (grade 3:1/2•3/4 í 100) and (grade 4: >3/4 í 100). The radiographs were characterized as convex, normal and concave soft tissue facial profile according to the facial convexity angle. Cephalometric analyses were done using Dolphin imaging computer software 11.95. Kruskal Wallis test was used to evaluate differences between airway ratio and facial morphologies; the mandibular plane angle was compared between airway ratio subgroups by Chi square.

Results

Airway ratio was not significantly different (P = 0.241) between soft tissue facial convexity subgroups and within age subgroups. Mandibular plane angle was in a significant relation within airway ratio (p = 0.028).

Conclusion

There was not any significant relation between decreased upper airway ratios and types of the soft or hard tissue facial profile convexity, however there was a significant relation between upper airway ratios and age subgroups. A significant revers correlation was seen between the mandibular plane angle and nasopharyngeal dimensions.

根据伊朗北部正畸患者初始侧位头颅x线片评估上气道尺寸与面部轮廓之间的关系
目的:腺样体增大导致的上气道尺寸减小可能对软组织或硬组织轮廓发育产生不利的美学和/或功能影响。本研究的目的是探讨腺样体大小与中矢状面上气道大小比(气道比例)和各种软硬组织面部轮廓凸度之间的关系。材料与方法收集6 ~ 12岁、13 ~ 18岁、19 ~ 25岁、26 ~ 29岁健康成人正畸前侧位头颅图像251张。根据气道比例分为4个亚组(1级:<1/4 í 100)、(2级:1/ 4•1/2 í 100)、(3级:1/2•3/4 í 100)和(4级:>3/4 í 100)。根据面部凸角,x线片表现为软组织面部轮廓凸、正常和凹。使用Dolphin计算机成像软件11.95进行头颅测量分析。采用Kruskal - Wallis检验评价气道比例与面部形态的差异;采用卡方法比较各气道比例亚组间下颌平面角的差异。结果软组织面部凸度亚组与年龄亚组间气道比值差异无统计学意义(P = 0.241)。下颌平面角与气道比值有显著相关(p = 0.028)。结论上呼吸道比例下降与软硬组织面部轮廓凸度类型无显著相关性,而上呼吸道比例下降与年龄亚组有显著相关性。下颌平面角与鼻咽尺寸呈显著的反向相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信