The Application of ideas of Family Stress Theory in Foreign Research

Q3 Social Sciences
T. Gurko
{"title":"The Application of ideas of Family Stress Theory in Foreign Research","authors":"T. Gurko","doi":"10.19181/socjour.2022.28.3.9157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of applying family stress theory in research practice is a consequence of increasingly varied stressful events occurring in the context of the evolution and transformation of such institutions as marriage and parenthood, as well as the unpredictable events taking place in the world. The main purpose of the review is to identify those subject areas of family sociology where the concepts of family stress theory (stressor, stress, crisis, resources, event perception, and strategies for coping with a stressful situation) are most often used or where empirical results are interpreted using this theory.\nAnalysis was based on articles published in leading journals over the last decade: the Journal of Marriage and Family, the Journal of Family Issues, the Journal of Comparative Family Studies, as well as in open sources. Such papers were selected that contained the results of quantitative research and of using qualitative methods such as interviews with family members.\nTwo main directions were identified. The first is the impact of pandemic–related stressors on families. The second is the stresses experienced by members of cross-border families and strategies for coping with stressful situations at the individual and family level. A large number of research articles on cross-border families are a result of the topic being relevant in many countries, on both the sending and receiving end. In turn, there is the possibility that cross-border families are more likely than others (depending on the criterion of typology) to be subject to various kinds of stressors.\nIt is shown that in different countries, social groups and families the results of coping with the stressful events associated with the pandemic were both positive and negative. In some families the mental health of children and adolescents declined during the pandemic, there was a marked increase in parental stress, marital conflicts, frequency of alcohol consumption and domestic violence. The positive consequences of isolation for other families included an increase in the duration of family communication, accelerated development of new technologies in the household sphere, optimization of household financial management, a more equitable distribution of family roles. For example, more fathers became involved in child care and classes with schoolchildren, in helping their wives with household chores. Even studies conducted during the 20th century showed that husbands and fathers become active as soon as difficult situations arise and are removed from family responsibilities when there is no more urgent need for their participation, something that was once again confirmed by the whole pandemic situation.\nThe analysis allowed identifying the main strategies transnational families use to cope with the stress of separation from family members. You see men and women changing their roles, generally accepted expectations about maternal/paternal roles, creating new families in the host country through cohabitation or marriage, mastering remote skills of coordinating services at home for the care of the elderly and/or children.\nThese two main areas of application of family stress theory do not exclude others. Such as— families where one of the members is disabled, suffers from various kinds of addictions (alcoholism, workaholism, drug addiction, gambling addiction), adult children have changed their gender, a family member has learned about a partner’s infidelity, families in various difficult economic situations (salary cut, job loss), etc.\nOne of the more promising areas of this theory’s application is the study of the increasingly more common family structures of two types in which family members are permanently in a stressful situation. The first is “apart– together” (Living Apart Together– LAT), when one of the spouses works/studies in another city or country, is serving a sentence, is serving in the army, etc., or the second is “together– apart” (Living Apart– LTA), when spouses or adult children/parents are forced to live in the same household.\nOne practical way of applying the theory is obtaining information about constructive and destructive strategies for coping with stress in various types of families and life situations. At both the individual and family levels it is important to form the correct perception of stress and the use of resources, to promote resilience and flexibility for the successful adaptation of families in a changing social context.","PeriodicalId":35261,"journal":{"name":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2022.28.3.9157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The relevance of applying family stress theory in research practice is a consequence of increasingly varied stressful events occurring in the context of the evolution and transformation of such institutions as marriage and parenthood, as well as the unpredictable events taking place in the world. The main purpose of the review is to identify those subject areas of family sociology where the concepts of family stress theory (stressor, stress, crisis, resources, event perception, and strategies for coping with a stressful situation) are most often used or where empirical results are interpreted using this theory. Analysis was based on articles published in leading journals over the last decade: the Journal of Marriage and Family, the Journal of Family Issues, the Journal of Comparative Family Studies, as well as in open sources. Such papers were selected that contained the results of quantitative research and of using qualitative methods such as interviews with family members. Two main directions were identified. The first is the impact of pandemic–related stressors on families. The second is the stresses experienced by members of cross-border families and strategies for coping with stressful situations at the individual and family level. A large number of research articles on cross-border families are a result of the topic being relevant in many countries, on both the sending and receiving end. In turn, there is the possibility that cross-border families are more likely than others (depending on the criterion of typology) to be subject to various kinds of stressors. It is shown that in different countries, social groups and families the results of coping with the stressful events associated with the pandemic were both positive and negative. In some families the mental health of children and adolescents declined during the pandemic, there was a marked increase in parental stress, marital conflicts, frequency of alcohol consumption and domestic violence. The positive consequences of isolation for other families included an increase in the duration of family communication, accelerated development of new technologies in the household sphere, optimization of household financial management, a more equitable distribution of family roles. For example, more fathers became involved in child care and classes with schoolchildren, in helping their wives with household chores. Even studies conducted during the 20th century showed that husbands and fathers become active as soon as difficult situations arise and are removed from family responsibilities when there is no more urgent need for their participation, something that was once again confirmed by the whole pandemic situation. The analysis allowed identifying the main strategies transnational families use to cope with the stress of separation from family members. You see men and women changing their roles, generally accepted expectations about maternal/paternal roles, creating new families in the host country through cohabitation or marriage, mastering remote skills of coordinating services at home for the care of the elderly and/or children. These two main areas of application of family stress theory do not exclude others. Such as— families where one of the members is disabled, suffers from various kinds of addictions (alcoholism, workaholism, drug addiction, gambling addiction), adult children have changed their gender, a family member has learned about a partner’s infidelity, families in various difficult economic situations (salary cut, job loss), etc. One of the more promising areas of this theory’s application is the study of the increasingly more common family structures of two types in which family members are permanently in a stressful situation. The first is “apart– together” (Living Apart Together– LAT), when one of the spouses works/studies in another city or country, is serving a sentence, is serving in the army, etc., or the second is “together– apart” (Living Apart– LTA), when spouses or adult children/parents are forced to live in the same household. One practical way of applying the theory is obtaining information about constructive and destructive strategies for coping with stress in various types of families and life situations. At both the individual and family levels it is important to form the correct perception of stress and the use of resources, to promote resilience and flexibility for the successful adaptation of families in a changing social context.
家庭压力理论在国外研究中的应用
将家庭压力理论应用于研究实践的相关性是在婚姻和为人父母等制度的演变和转型背景下发生的越来越多样化的压力事件,以及世界上发生的不可预测的事件的结果。本综述的主要目的是确定家庭社会学中最常使用家庭压力理论概念(压力源、压力、危机、资源、事件感知和应对压力情况的策略)的学科领域,或使用该理论解释经验结果的学科领域。分析基于过去十年中发表在主流期刊上的文章:《婚姻与家庭杂志》、《家庭问题杂志》和《比较家庭研究杂志》,以及公开来源。选择的这些论文包含了定量研究和使用定性方法(如对家庭成员的访谈)的结果。确定了两个主要方向。首先是与疫情相关的压力源对家庭的影响。第二个是跨境家庭成员所经历的压力,以及在个人和家庭层面应对压力情况的策略。大量关于跨境家庭的研究文章是该主题在许多国家的发送端和接收端都具有相关性的结果。反过来,跨境家庭比其他家庭更有可能(取决于类型标准)受到各种压力。研究表明,在不同的国家、社会群体和家庭中,应对与疫情相关的压力事件的结果是积极的和消极的。在一些家庭中,儿童和青少年的心理健康在疫情期间有所下降,父母压力、婚姻冲突、饮酒频率和家庭暴力明显增加。隔离对其他家庭的积极影响包括延长家庭沟通的时间,加快家庭领域新技术的发展,优化家庭财务管理,更公平地分配家庭角色。例如,越来越多的父亲开始参与儿童保育和学童课堂,帮助妻子做家务。甚至在20世纪进行的研究也表明,丈夫和父亲一旦出现困难情况就会变得活跃起来,当不再迫切需要他们参与时,他们就会被免除家庭责任,整个疫情再次证实了这一点。通过分析,可以确定跨国家庭应对与家庭成员分离压力的主要策略。你可以看到男人和女人改变他们的角色,普遍接受的对母亲/父亲角色的期望,通过同居或婚姻在东道国建立新的家庭,掌握在家协调照顾老人和/或儿童服务的远程技能。家庭压力理论的这两个主要应用领域并不排斥其他领域。例如,其中一名成员是残疾人,患有各种成瘾(酗酒、工作狂、毒瘾、赌博成瘾),成年子女改变了性别,一名家庭成员得知伴侣不忠,家庭经济状况困难(减薪、失业),等。这一理论应用的一个更有前景的领域是研究越来越常见的两种类型的家庭结构,在这两种类型中,家庭成员永远处于压力状态。第一种是“分开-一起”(Living apart together–LAT),当配偶中的一方在另一个城市或国家工作/学习、正在服刑、在军队服役等时;第二种是“一起-分开”(Liing apart–LTA),当夫妻或成年子女/父母被迫住在同一个家庭时。应用该理论的一种实用方法是获得关于在各种类型的家庭和生活情况下应对压力的建设性和破坏性策略的信息。在个人和家庭层面,重要的是形成对压力和资源使用的正确认识,促进家庭在不断变化的社会环境中成功适应的韧性和灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” publishes the articles on sociological disciplines. Interdisciplinary studies in sociology and related disciplines, such as social psychology, cultural studies, anthropology, ethnography, etc. — are also welcomed. The main emphasis is on the fundamental research in the field of theory, methodology and history of sociology. The regular rubric highlights the results of mass surveys and case studies. The rubric “Discussion”, which debated the controversial issues of sociological research, is regular as well. The journal publishes book reviews, and summaries, as well as lists of new books in Russian and English, which represent the main areas of interdisciplinary research in the social sciences. The journal aims to not only play samples of knowledge, considered regulatory and standards of internal expertise in the professional community, but also aims for opportunities to improve them. These rules, a tough selection and decision to print only a small portion of incoming materials allow “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” contribute to improving the quality of sociological research. Submitted manuscripts should show a high integrity in problem setting, problem analysis and correspond to the journal’s thematic profile and its scientific priorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信