“Are You One of Us?” Points of Social Exclusion amongst Youths of Diverse Religious Groups in Indonesia

Roosalina Wulandari, E. K. Poerwandari
{"title":"“Are You One of Us?” Points of Social Exclusion amongst Youths of Diverse Religious Groups in Indonesia","authors":"Roosalina Wulandari, E. K. Poerwandari","doi":"10.21512/humaniora.v12i3.7036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deriving from basis of the social identity theory and its development, the research aimed to explore the points of exclusion and how individuals and groups perceived themselves as experiencing victimhood of social injustice. The rise of intolerance in Indonesia was alarming and threatened the diversity and inclusivity of the nation. Throughout several political milestones such as gubernatorial and presidential elections, identity had been used as one of the most efficient ways to segregate and discriminate against people belonging to different groups. Applying a qualitative approach, data were mined from two focus group discussions of university student respondents with various religious and ethnic backgrounds representing the majority and minority groups in Indonesia. Groups sessions were strictly differentiated between majority and minority representatives to minimize the risk of potential conflict. The findings suggest that both groups’ initial perceptions towards members of outgroups are heavily influenced by transferred stereotypes and prejudices from the older generations. While the majority group struggles to counter the prejudices and perceived victimhood through direct exposure, the minority group, on the other hand, takes language into account as a subtle gesture of exclusion.","PeriodicalId":30545,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i3.7036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deriving from basis of the social identity theory and its development, the research aimed to explore the points of exclusion and how individuals and groups perceived themselves as experiencing victimhood of social injustice. The rise of intolerance in Indonesia was alarming and threatened the diversity and inclusivity of the nation. Throughout several political milestones such as gubernatorial and presidential elections, identity had been used as one of the most efficient ways to segregate and discriminate against people belonging to different groups. Applying a qualitative approach, data were mined from two focus group discussions of university student respondents with various religious and ethnic backgrounds representing the majority and minority groups in Indonesia. Groups sessions were strictly differentiated between majority and minority representatives to minimize the risk of potential conflict. The findings suggest that both groups’ initial perceptions towards members of outgroups are heavily influenced by transferred stereotypes and prejudices from the older generations. While the majority group struggles to counter the prejudices and perceived victimhood through direct exposure, the minority group, on the other hand, takes language into account as a subtle gesture of exclusion.
“你是我们中的一员吗?”印尼不同宗教团体青年的社会排斥点
本研究源于社会认同理论及其发展的基础,旨在探讨排斥点以及个人和群体如何将自己视为社会不公正的受害者。印度尼西亚不容忍现象的抬头令人担忧,并威胁到该国的多样性和包容性。在州长和总统选举等几个政治里程碑中,身份一直被用作隔离和歧视不同群体的最有效方式之一。采用定性方法,从代表印度尼西亚多数群体和少数群体的具有不同宗教和种族背景的大学生受访者的两个焦点小组讨论中挖掘数据。小组会议严格区分多数派代表和少数派代表,以尽量减少潜在冲突的风险。研究结果表明,这两个群体对外部群体成员的最初看法在很大程度上受到老一辈转移的刻板印象和偏见的影响。当多数群体努力通过直接接触来对抗偏见和被感知的受害者时,另一方面,少数群体则将语言视为一种微妙的排斥姿态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书