Investigation of the Prognostic Values of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in Predicting the Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
S. Yeşiltaş, Saadet Öztop, M. Günay, I. Sümer, S. Akbaş, S. Yılmaz, Ö. Pasin, K. Karaaslan
{"title":"Investigation of the Prognostic Values of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in Predicting the Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019","authors":"S. Yeşiltaş, Saadet Öztop, M. Günay, I. Sümer, S. Akbaş, S. Yılmaz, Ö. Pasin, K. Karaaslan","doi":"10.4274/imj.galenos.2023.44380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Advanced age is an independent risk factor for increased mortality in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the best method for estimating mortality in elderly patients with COVID-19 is still under debate. We performed this study to assess the shock index (SI) and the modified shock index (MSI) for the abovementioned problem. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted including elderly cases (>= 65 years) confirmed with COVID-19 who admitted to a tertiary university hospital between March-December 2020. The SI and MSI at the time of the emergency department visits were used to evaluate the intensive care unit admission, ventilator support, septic shock, and 30-day mortality in all patients. The receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) were used to measure the overall ability of SI and MSI to predict clinical outcomes. Results: We recruited 334 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 75.2 +/- 7.3 and an almost equal gender distribution [170 males (50.9%)]. In deceased and surviving patients, the SI was 0.66 +/- 0.16 and 0.6 +/- 0.1 (p=0.014), while the MSI was 0.95 +/- 0.22 and 1.09 +/- 0.34 (p=0.003), respectively. In predicting mortality, the AUC of the SI and MSI were 0.590 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.535 to 0.643] and 0.608 (95% CI: 0.553 to 0.660), respectively. Conclusion: Increased SIs and MSIs are associated with 30-day mortality. SI and MSI can benefit the triage of elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19. However, it was found that there is no single cut-off value of SI or MSI with optimum accuracy for predicting COVID-19-related clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":42584,"journal":{"name":"Istanbul Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istanbul Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/imj.galenos.2023.44380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced age is an independent risk factor for increased mortality in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the best method for estimating mortality in elderly patients with COVID-19 is still under debate. We performed this study to assess the shock index (SI) and the modified shock index (MSI) for the abovementioned problem. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted including elderly cases (>= 65 years) confirmed with COVID-19 who admitted to a tertiary university hospital between March-December 2020. The SI and MSI at the time of the emergency department visits were used to evaluate the intensive care unit admission, ventilator support, septic shock, and 30-day mortality in all patients. The receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) were used to measure the overall ability of SI and MSI to predict clinical outcomes. Results: We recruited 334 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 75.2 +/- 7.3 and an almost equal gender distribution [170 males (50.9%)]. In deceased and surviving patients, the SI was 0.66 +/- 0.16 and 0.6 +/- 0.1 (p=0.014), while the MSI was 0.95 +/- 0.22 and 1.09 +/- 0.34 (p=0.003), respectively. In predicting mortality, the AUC of the SI and MSI were 0.590 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.535 to 0.643] and 0.608 (95% CI: 0.553 to 0.660), respectively. Conclusion: Increased SIs and MSIs are associated with 30-day mortality. SI and MSI can benefit the triage of elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19. However, it was found that there is no single cut-off value of SI or MSI with optimum accuracy for predicting COVID-19-related clinical outcomes.
休克指数和修正休克指数对2019冠状病毒病住院老年患者临床预后预测价值的探讨
简介:高龄是2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)死亡率增加的独立风险因素。然而,估计新冠肺炎老年患者死亡率的最佳方法仍在争论中。我们进行这项研究是为了评估上述问题的休克指数(SI)和改良休克指数(MSI)。方法:对2020年3月至12月间入住三级大学医院的确诊为新冠肺炎的老年病例(>=65岁)进行回顾性研究。急诊就诊时的SI和MSI用于评估所有患者的重症监护室入院、呼吸机支持、感染性休克和30天死亡率。受试者的工作特征和曲线下面积(AUC)用于测量SI和MSI预测临床结果的总体能力。结果:我们招募了334名连续的新冠肺炎患者,平均年龄为75.2+/-7.3,性别分布几乎相等[170名男性(50.9%)]。在死亡和幸存患者中,SI分别为0.66+/-0.16和0.6+/-0.1(p=0.014),MSI分别为0.95+/-0.22和1.09+/-0.34(p=0.003)。在预测死亡率时,SI和MSI的AUC分别为0.590[95%置信区间(CI):0.535至0.643]和0.608(95%置信区间:0.553至0.660)。结论:SI和MSIs的增加与30天死亡率相关。SI和MSI有利于对因新冠肺炎住院的老年患者进行分诊。然而,研究发现,对于预测COVID-19相关的临床结果,没有具有最佳准确度的SI或MSI的单一截止值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Istanbul Medical Journal
Istanbul Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信