Challenges and Lessons Learned Conducting a Formative Evaluation of a Multicomponent Care Delivery Intervention

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Rosalind E. Keith, Shannon Heitkamp, J. Little, Victoria Peebles, Rumin Sarwar, Dana M. Petersen, A. O'Malley
{"title":"Challenges and Lessons Learned Conducting a Formative Evaluation of a Multicomponent Care Delivery Intervention","authors":"Rosalind E. Keith, Shannon Heitkamp, J. Little, Victoria Peebles, Rumin Sarwar, Dana M. Petersen, A. O'Malley","doi":"10.1177/10982140221116096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formative evaluation provides stakeholders with timely feedback to support an intervention's improvement during implementation to maximize its effectiveness. We describe the qualitative methods that guided one study within a formative evaluation of a multicomponent care delivery intervention. We then describe the challenges and lessons learned that emerged from this study, organizing them by the study's four overarching challenges: (1) addressing multiple research questions, (2) working with a large interdisciplinary team, (3) triangulating qualitative results with quantitative results, and (4) studying implementation in real-world delivery settings. Overall, the evaluation generated important findings to support improvement of the intervention during implementation. We hope that sharing the lessons learned will increase the rigor and efficiency with which formative evaluations of complex care delivery interventions are conducted and the likelihood that they will improve implementation in real time. We also hope the lessons learned will enhance the satisfaction of the researchers working on these evaluations.","PeriodicalId":51449,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140221116096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formative evaluation provides stakeholders with timely feedback to support an intervention's improvement during implementation to maximize its effectiveness. We describe the qualitative methods that guided one study within a formative evaluation of a multicomponent care delivery intervention. We then describe the challenges and lessons learned that emerged from this study, organizing them by the study's four overarching challenges: (1) addressing multiple research questions, (2) working with a large interdisciplinary team, (3) triangulating qualitative results with quantitative results, and (4) studying implementation in real-world delivery settings. Overall, the evaluation generated important findings to support improvement of the intervention during implementation. We hope that sharing the lessons learned will increase the rigor and efficiency with which formative evaluations of complex care delivery interventions are conducted and the likelihood that they will improve implementation in real time. We also hope the lessons learned will enhance the satisfaction of the researchers working on these evaluations.
对多成分护理提供干预进行形成性评估的挑战和经验教训
形成性评价为利益攸关方提供及时的反馈,以支持干预措施在实施过程中的改进,从而最大限度地提高其有效性。我们描述了在多成分护理提供干预的形成性评估中指导一项研究的定性方法。然后,我们描述了这项研究中出现的挑战和经验教训,并根据研究的四个总体挑战进行组织:(1)解决多个研究问题,(2)与大型跨学科团队合作,(3)将定性结果与定量结果进行三角测量,以及(4)研究现实世界交付环境中的实施。总体而言,评价得出了重要结论,支持在执行期间改进干预措施。我们希望,分享经验教训将提高对复杂护理提供干预措施进行形成性评估的严谨性和效率,并提高它们实时改进实施的可能性。我们还希望所吸取的经验教训将提高从事这些评估的研究人员的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Evaluation (AJE) publishes original papers about the methods, theory, practice, and findings of evaluation. The general goal of AJE is to present the best work in and about evaluation, in order to improve the knowledge base and practice of its readers. Because the field of evaluation is diverse, with different intellectual traditions, approaches to practice, and domains of application, the papers published in AJE will reflect this diversity. Nevertheless, preference is given to papers that are likely to be of interest to a wide range of evaluators and that are written to be accessible to most readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信