Evaluation of the Economic Impacts of the European Rural Development Program in Austria

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.18461/IJFSD.V11I2.42

O. Meixner, Franz Schlögl, Manfred Pichlbauer

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of an ongoing evaluation process of EU subsidies of the European Rural Development Programme 2014-20 are presented (2nd intermediary report). By means of personal interviews of subsidised companies in the Austrian food and beverage sector, the impact of subsidies on profitability, competitiveness, and related variables are approximated. Data sources are, amongst others, conventional business data collected by personal face-to-face interviews, as well as financial statements of companies. The results show that subsidies in general have positive effects. In addition, two third of the sample would change their investments significantly or even refrain from investing at all without public support.

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧洲农村发展计划在奥地利的经济影响评估

介绍了欧盟对2014-20年欧洲农村发展计划补贴的持续评估过程的结果（第二次中介报告）。通过对奥地利食品和饮料行业受补贴公司的个人访谈，对补贴对盈利能力、竞争力和相关变量的影响进行了近似分析。数据来源包括通过个人面对面访谈收集的传统商业数据以及公司的财务报表。结果表明，补贴总体上具有积极作用。此外，三分之二的样本会在没有公众支持的情况下大幅改变投资，甚至根本不投资。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Understanding the development of the food system requires a system view that captures the complexity of the system and its many interrelationships with its economic, social and natural environments. The Journal accepts and offers papers within this broad range of issues focussing on the management, policy, marketing, consumer aspects, transparency, e-commerce, institutional or regional development, information and communication systems, ressource economics, production economics, chain management, network economics, and similar aspects. Papers may focus on modeling, empirical research or theoretical analyis. This broad range of publication opportunities asks authors to follow clear lines of arguments and to present arguments in a convincing way that avoids unnecessary complexities of model formulations if not relevant for the support of arguments. The publication of scientific articles is complemented by a number of sections that provide room for publications with a more specific focus: ''Case studies'': A section on case studies of the ''Harvard Type'' allows the publication of studies that might build on established scientific methodology but demonstrate its use in ceratin decision environments. Case studies might be complemented by ''teaching cases'' that are kept on a database outside the journal but accessible to readers on approval by authors. ''Research Forum'': It allows to discuss newly emerging research challenges or to contribute to ongoing scientific discussions on research problems. In addition, authors might initiate a discussion on issues brought up by articles published in the journal. ''Research Notes'': It provides room for specific shorter scientific contributions with a narrow scope.