Usability Assessment of Different Contact Models for Modelling the Failure Behaviour of Sedimentary Rocks Under Unconfined Stress Conditions

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
E. Zengin
{"title":"Usability Assessment of Different Contact Models for Modelling the Failure Behaviour of Sedimentary Rocks Under Unconfined Stress Conditions","authors":"E. Zengin","doi":"10.17824/yerbilimleri.1030332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methods applied in rock material and rock mass studies related to rock mechanics have begun to differentiate with computational and software technology development in recent years. Particle Flow Code software, which is based on the discrete element method, is used in many studies on rock mechanics. Using Particle Flow Code, rock behaviour under different stress conditions can be modelled and analysed in both two and three dimensions. Rocks can be presented by an assembly of disks in two dimensions and spherical particles in three dimensions. These particles are bonded to each other by contact models with different micromechanical properties. Model failure occurs as a result of the fracturing with the rupture of these bonds. Using parameters such as density, strength, deformation, which can be defined as the mathematical expression of the natural properties of rock samples, a representative models can be created by following multi-stage calibration procedure and used for different research purposes. In order to have a representative model, chosen contact models should be mimic the failure behaviour of the rock material. For this purpose, calibrated models were created for both PBM (Parallel-bonded model) and FJM (Flat-jointed model) using the experimental results of the unconfined compressive strength test of Hawkesbury sandstone in the laboratory. In the calibration phase, the results obtained from the models were compared against micromechanical data obtained from the laboratory experiments such as elasticity modulus, uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, and Poisson ratio. Results were evaluated by considering the displacement vectors, force chains, and crack parameters in terms of resolution and representativeness of the failure behaviour. The results of PBM and FJM model results were similar for displacement vector direction and orientation and distribution of the forces effective in breaking the bonds which is force chain. However, in terms of fracture resolution and localization, FJM provides detailed results, of which could be very useful for comprehensive studies.","PeriodicalId":52537,"journal":{"name":"Yerbilimleri/ Earth Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yerbilimleri/ Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17824/yerbilimleri.1030332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The methods applied in rock material and rock mass studies related to rock mechanics have begun to differentiate with computational and software technology development in recent years. Particle Flow Code software, which is based on the discrete element method, is used in many studies on rock mechanics. Using Particle Flow Code, rock behaviour under different stress conditions can be modelled and analysed in both two and three dimensions. Rocks can be presented by an assembly of disks in two dimensions and spherical particles in three dimensions. These particles are bonded to each other by contact models with different micromechanical properties. Model failure occurs as a result of the fracturing with the rupture of these bonds. Using parameters such as density, strength, deformation, which can be defined as the mathematical expression of the natural properties of rock samples, a representative models can be created by following multi-stage calibration procedure and used for different research purposes. In order to have a representative model, chosen contact models should be mimic the failure behaviour of the rock material. For this purpose, calibrated models were created for both PBM (Parallel-bonded model) and FJM (Flat-jointed model) using the experimental results of the unconfined compressive strength test of Hawkesbury sandstone in the laboratory. In the calibration phase, the results obtained from the models were compared against micromechanical data obtained from the laboratory experiments such as elasticity modulus, uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, and Poisson ratio. Results were evaluated by considering the displacement vectors, force chains, and crack parameters in terms of resolution and representativeness of the failure behaviour. The results of PBM and FJM model results were similar for displacement vector direction and orientation and distribution of the forces effective in breaking the bonds which is force chain. However, in terms of fracture resolution and localization, FJM provides detailed results, of which could be very useful for comprehensive studies.
模拟无侧限应力条件下沉积岩破坏行为的不同接触模型的可用性评价
近年来,随着计算技术和软件技术的发展,岩石力学在岩石材料和岩体研究中应用的方法开始出现分化。基于离散元法的Particle Flow Code软件在岩石力学研究中得到广泛应用。使用粒子流代码,岩石在不同应力条件下的行为可以在二维和三维上建模和分析。岩石可以用二维圆盘和三维球形粒子的组合来表示。这些颗粒通过具有不同微观力学性能的接触模型相互结合。模型的破坏是由于这些键的断裂造成的。将密度、强度、变形等参数定义为岩样自然属性的数学表达式,通过多阶段的校准程序,可以建立具有代表性的模型,用于不同的研究目的。为了有一个有代表性的模型,所选择的接触模型应该模拟岩石材料的破坏行为。为此,利用Hawkesbury砂岩无侧限抗压强度试验结果,分别对PBM (parallel -bond model)和FJM (flat -joint model)建立了校准模型。在校准阶段,将模型得到的结果与实验室实验得到的微力学数据(如弹性模量、单轴抗压强度、抗拉强度和泊松比)进行比较。通过考虑位移向量、力链和裂纹参数对破坏行为的分辨率和代表性来评估结果。PBM模型和FJM模型的结果在位移矢量方向和有效破坏力链的力的方向和分布上是相似的。但是,FJM在裂缝分辨率和定位方面提供了详细的结果,这对综合研究非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yerbilimleri/ Earth Sciences
Yerbilimleri/ Earth Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Stratigraphy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Manuscripts submitted to YERBİLİMLERİ should have not been published or simultaneously submitted elsewhere. The overlap of contents between related papers should be the minimum, and normally confined to the introductory/review sections. Authors should consult the Journal’s “Instructions for Contributors” for detailed stylistic guidelines during preparation of their manuscript. Editors may return manuscripts that are grossly inconsistent with these guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书