Drop out Factors in Data Literacy and Research Data Management Survey: Experiences from Lithuania and Finland

Q3 Engineering
Jurgita Rudžionienė, Vincas Grigas, Heidi P. K. Enwald, T. Kortelainen
{"title":"Drop out Factors in Data Literacy and Research Data Management Survey: Experiences from Lithuania and Finland","authors":"Jurgita Rudžionienė, Vincas Grigas, Heidi P. K. Enwald, T. Kortelainen","doi":"10.15388/IM.2018.82.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] \nThe purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of factors that affect the respondents to drop out of an already started survey on research data management. We decided to take a questionnaire on data management survey at Vilnius University and Oulu University implemented in 2017 as a case study. The data for the analysis was collected using the questionnaire, which was used in multinational research for Data Literacy and Research Data Management, performed by a group of researchers in more than ten countries, initiated by Serap Kurbanoglu and Joumana Boustany. This paper describes the analysis of 1 185 survey samples, of which 515 were unfinished and 670 finished in both universities. For the analysis of the data, we used Framework for Web Survey Participation created by Andy Peytchev (2009). The collected data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 19 with descriptive and inferential statistical tests. The most significant factors on deciding not to finish the survey were the length of the survey, the scientific field, experience, age and the topic of the survey. No statistically significant difference was measured between those who finished the survey and unfinished evaluating the data by gender and job position. An important factor in not finishing the survey was the design of the survey.","PeriodicalId":37230,"journal":{"name":"Informacijos Mokslai","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacijos Mokslai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/IM.2018.82.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] The purpose of this paper is to develop an understanding of factors that affect the respondents to drop out of an already started survey on research data management. We decided to take a questionnaire on data management survey at Vilnius University and Oulu University implemented in 2017 as a case study. The data for the analysis was collected using the questionnaire, which was used in multinational research for Data Literacy and Research Data Management, performed by a group of researchers in more than ten countries, initiated by Serap Kurbanoglu and Joumana Boustany. This paper describes the analysis of 1 185 survey samples, of which 515 were unfinished and 670 finished in both universities. For the analysis of the data, we used Framework for Web Survey Participation created by Andy Peytchev (2009). The collected data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 19 with descriptive and inferential statistical tests. The most significant factors on deciding not to finish the survey were the length of the survey, the scientific field, experience, age and the topic of the survey. No statistically significant difference was measured between those who finished the survey and unfinished evaluating the data by gender and job position. An important factor in not finishing the survey was the design of the survey.
数据素养和研究数据管理调查中的辍学因素:来自立陶宛和芬兰的经验
[全文,英文摘要;本文的目的是了解影响受访者退出已经开始的研究数据管理调查的因素。我们决定以维尔纽斯大学和奥卢大学2017年实施的数据管理调查问卷为案例研究。用于分析的数据是通过问卷收集的,该问卷用于数据素养和研究数据管理的跨国研究,由Serap Kurbanoglu和Joumana Boustany发起,由十多个国家的一组研究人员进行。本文对1 185份调查样本进行了分析,其中未完成样本515份,两校已完成样本670份。对于数据的分析,我们使用了Andy Peytchev(2009)创建的网络调查参与框架。采用IBM SPSS Statistics ver对收集的数据进行分析。19采用描述性和推论性统计检验。决定不完成调查的最重要因素是调查的长度,科学领域,经验,年龄和调查的主题。根据性别和工作职位,完成调查和未完成调查的人之间没有统计学上的显著差异。未能完成调查的一个重要因素是调查的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informacijos Mokslai
Informacijos Mokslai Engineering-Media Technology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信