Art Techniques and Means of Expression of “Black Cinema”: From Neo-Noir to Post-Noir

N. Markhaichuk, V. Tarasov
{"title":"Art Techniques and Means of Expression of “Black Cinema”: From Neo-Noir to Post-Noir","authors":"N. Markhaichuk, V. Tarasov","doi":"10.31516/2410-5325.079.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to study art techniques and means of expression of neo-noir and post-noir in the cinematography of the late XX — early XXI centuries. The subject of analysis are noir phenomena — the latest and postmodern processes in cinema, based on the aesthetic, genre and style canon of noir. Noir phenomena in the language of cinematography could not remain within the narrow limits of the aesthetics of “black” cinema. That is why they became a space of transformations: stylistic, genre, narrative, semantic, etc. \nThe methodology of theoretical analysis in this article is based both on the whole complex of ideas related to the subject of research, and on specific scientific tools. The study is part of a more general research case, which focuses on the analysis of the phenomenology of “black cinema” (or noir) in the cinema of the late XX — early XXI centuries. In a separate publication, the authors of this study investigated the issue of “genre memory” of noir. Also, a part of the research case is the problem of analysis of expressive means and artistic techniques in cinematography of the late XX — early XXI centuries. This problem was also considered by the authors of the study in a series of publications devoted to the “collage” artistic language of the Ukrainian director S. Paradzhanov. The methodological basis of the article relies on the research of Western scientists: Gavin Smith, Charles Scruggs, Jean-Pierre Chartier, Simon P. Otieno, David Copenhafer, Mary P. Wood, Lisa Colpaert, Thomas Leitch, James McRoy, Emily R. Anderson. \nThe results. Our definition of the set of basic techniques and expressive means of “noir” phenomena in the cinematography of the second half of the XX — beginning of the XXI centuries allows us to distinguish three spatial-compositional systems that characterize the specifics of noir, neo-noir and post-noir. \nIn the first case, we observe a linear unfolding of the action, within which scenes and framing are in a direct cause-and-effect relationship. \nIn the context of neo-noir, compositionality is a question of the specific action topos of the film; despite the existence of general rules and characteristics of working with planes and space, the general impression of “panoramity” and different scales is dominant. \nPost-noir aesthetics is formed in the plane of a greater variety of artistic techniques, which is connected with the practical absence of “canonical” boundaries and the property of post-aesthetics to combine various effects, means (and in some cases to resort to “citation” and “redefinition”). \nThe scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that the formation of artistic symbolism and imagery of neo- and post-classical noir aesthetics as a system is investigated for the first time. The authors analyze the specifics of expressive means of neo-noir and post-noir, which unite the phenomena into one whole. \nThe practical significance of the article is that the conducted scientific analysis makes it possible to reveal the forms of representation of “noir” phenomena in modern cinema.","PeriodicalId":33223,"journal":{"name":"Kul''tura Ukrayini","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kul''tura Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.079.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study art techniques and means of expression of neo-noir and post-noir in the cinematography of the late XX — early XXI centuries. The subject of analysis are noir phenomena — the latest and postmodern processes in cinema, based on the aesthetic, genre and style canon of noir. Noir phenomena in the language of cinematography could not remain within the narrow limits of the aesthetics of “black” cinema. That is why they became a space of transformations: stylistic, genre, narrative, semantic, etc. The methodology of theoretical analysis in this article is based both on the whole complex of ideas related to the subject of research, and on specific scientific tools. The study is part of a more general research case, which focuses on the analysis of the phenomenology of “black cinema” (or noir) in the cinema of the late XX — early XXI centuries. In a separate publication, the authors of this study investigated the issue of “genre memory” of noir. Also, a part of the research case is the problem of analysis of expressive means and artistic techniques in cinematography of the late XX — early XXI centuries. This problem was also considered by the authors of the study in a series of publications devoted to the “collage” artistic language of the Ukrainian director S. Paradzhanov. The methodological basis of the article relies on the research of Western scientists: Gavin Smith, Charles Scruggs, Jean-Pierre Chartier, Simon P. Otieno, David Copenhafer, Mary P. Wood, Lisa Colpaert, Thomas Leitch, James McRoy, Emily R. Anderson. The results. Our definition of the set of basic techniques and expressive means of “noir” phenomena in the cinematography of the second half of the XX — beginning of the XXI centuries allows us to distinguish three spatial-compositional systems that characterize the specifics of noir, neo-noir and post-noir. In the first case, we observe a linear unfolding of the action, within which scenes and framing are in a direct cause-and-effect relationship. In the context of neo-noir, compositionality is a question of the specific action topos of the film; despite the existence of general rules and characteristics of working with planes and space, the general impression of “panoramity” and different scales is dominant. Post-noir aesthetics is formed in the plane of a greater variety of artistic techniques, which is connected with the practical absence of “canonical” boundaries and the property of post-aesthetics to combine various effects, means (and in some cases to resort to “citation” and “redefinition”). The scientific novelty of the research lies in the fact that the formation of artistic symbolism and imagery of neo- and post-classical noir aesthetics as a system is investigated for the first time. The authors analyze the specifics of expressive means of neo-noir and post-noir, which unite the phenomena into one whole. The practical significance of the article is that the conducted scientific analysis makes it possible to reveal the forms of representation of “noir” phenomena in modern cinema.
“黑色电影”的艺术手法与表现手法:从新黑色到后黑色
本文旨在研究二十世纪末二十一世纪初新黑色电影和后黑色电影在电影摄影中的表现手法。分析的主题是黑色现象——基于黑色电影的美学、流派和风格标准,电影中最新的后现代过程。电影语言中的黑色现象不能停留在“黑色”电影美学的狭窄范围内。这就是为什么它们成为了一个转换的空间:文体、体裁、叙事、语义等。本文的理论分析方法既基于与研究主题相关的整个复杂思想,也基于特定的科学工具。本研究是一个更普遍的研究案例的一部分,该案例侧重于分析二十世纪末二十一世纪初电影中的“黑色电影”现象学。在另一份出版物中,这项研究的作者调查了黑色电影的“类型记忆”问题。另外,研究案例的一部分是二十世纪末二十一世纪初电影摄影的表现手段和艺术技巧的分析问题。该研究的作者在一系列致力于乌克兰导演S.Paradzhanov的“拼贴”艺术语言的出版物中也考虑了这个问题。本文的方法论基础依赖于西方科学家的研究:加文·史密斯、查尔斯·斯克鲁格斯、让-皮埃尔·沙蒂尔、西蒙·P·奥蒂埃诺、大卫·科彭哈费尔、玛丽·P·伍德、丽莎·科尔帕特、托马斯·莱奇、詹姆斯·麦克罗伊、艾米丽·安德森。结果。在二十世纪下半叶——二十一世纪初的电影摄影中,我们对“黑色”现象的基本技术和表现手段的定义使我们能够区分三个空间构图系统,这三个系统分别代表了黑色、新黑色和后黑色的特点。在第一种情况下,我们观察到动作的线性展开,其中场景和框架处于直接的因果关系中。在新黑色电影的背景下,合成性是电影具体动作拓扑的问题;尽管存在处理平面和空间的一般规则和特征,但全景和不同尺度的总体印象占主导地位。后黑色美学是在多种艺术手法的平面上形成的,这与“规范”边界的实际缺失以及后美学将各种效果、手段结合在一起的特性有关(在某些情况下,还诉诸于“引用”和“重新定义”)。这项研究的科学新颖之处在于,首次将新古典和后古典黑色美学作为一个系统来研究其艺术象征和意象的形成。作者分析了新黑色和后黑色的表现手法的具体特点,它们将现象统一为一个整体。本文的现实意义在于,通过科学的分析,揭示了现代电影中“黑色”现象的表现形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信